Owner-reported complaints naming the transmission system, filed with NHTSA
Data refreshed
Transmission reportsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
176
Latest Apr 24, 2013
Share of all reportsThis category as a share of every owner report on file for this model year. One report can name more than one component, so the categories overlap.
65%
of 271 total
Crash or fire reportedReports in this category whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. The reporter's own answer on the NHTSA form, not a verified finding.
4
Injuries or deaths reportedTotals the submitters entered on their own reports in this category. Not verified by NHTSA and not a casualty statistic.
3
What this page shows
Reports naming the automatic or manual transmission, including shifting behaviour, shudder, slipping and transmission control modules. Every record below is an owner-reported complaint about the 2001 Acura Cl submitted to NHTSA — not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. 176 reports on file name it.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Owner reports naming transmission
The 25 most recent of 176, in the owner's own words
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 ACURA CL. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 30 MPH, THE TRANSMISSION SLIPPED AND THE RPMS INCREASED EXCESSIVELY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE TRANSMISSION NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE AND STATED THAT THE VEHICLE WAS PREVIOUSLY REPAIRED UNDER NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 04V176000 (POWER TRAIN: AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION) IN 2004 BUT THE FAILURE WAS NOT CORRECTED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 57,000. *TR
NHTSA ID
10509417
Incident
Feb 20, 2013
Mileage
57,000 mi
Transmission
Filed Nov 10, 2011
2001 ACURA 3.2 CL. CONSUMER WRITES IN REGARDS TO TRANSMISSION PROBLEMS *TGW THE CONSUMER STATED THE TRANSMISSION WOULD SLIP AT TIMES WHILE DRIVING. WHEN THE CONSUMER CONTACTED ACURA, HE WAS INFORMED THEIR RECORDS INDICATED THE TRANSMISSION WAS REPLACED ON OR ABOUT APRIL 12, 2004. THE CONSUMER STATED HE HAS NO RECORD OF THE TRANSMISSION BEING REPLACED. THE CONSUMER STATED HIS WIFE DID TAKE THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER ON MARCH 29,2004 BECAUSE SHE WAS EXPERIENCING PROBLEMS WITH THE TRANSMISSION, BUT THE SERVICE REPORT READ NO PROBLEM FOUND. *JB
NHTSA ID
10435735
Incident
Mar 29, 2004
Transmission
Filed Aug 22, 2011
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 ACURA 3.2 CL. WHILE DRIVING 55 MPH, THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE JERKED AND STALLED. A LOCAL MECHANIC DIAGNOSED THAT THE TRANSMISSION WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED. THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER DENIED ANY ASSISTANCE WITH REPAIRS TO THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE WAS NOT REMEDIED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 100,000.
NHTSA ID
10420970
Incident
Jul 4, 2011
Mileage
100,000 mi
Transmission
Filed Aug 5, 2011
I HAVE HAD 2 TRANSMISSIONS REPLACED AND MY 3RD TRANSMISSION IS FAILING AS WELL. I HAVE GONE THROUGH ACURA TO SEE IF THEY COULD GOODWILL THE TRANSMISSION SINCE I AM A VICTIM OF THIER FAULTY TRANSMISSION RECALL. THEY REFUSED TO REPLACE MY TRANSMISSION AND TOLD ME IT WOULD BE $5,100 TO REPLACE. I FEEL THAT THIS IS NOT MY FAULT AS THEY HAVE ENGINEERED A DEFECTIVE TRANSMISSION THAT HAS REULTED IN DEATHS AND SERIOUS ACCIDENTS. I WAS JUST OUT SIDE THE 3YR/36,000 MILE WARRANTY AND THE WOULD NOT HELP. AS A MEMBER OF OUR ARMED SERVICES I FEEL I AM BEING TREATED VERY UNFAIRLY AND I FEAR FOR MY LIFE EVERY TIME I GET INTO MY VEHICLE. I AM NOT ABLE TO PAY THIS KIND OF MONEY TO REPLACE THERE PROBLEM. *TT
NHTSA ID
10417709
Incident
May 1, 2010
Mileage
155,000 mi
Transmission
Filed Jul 2, 2011
CHECK ENGINE DUE TO TRANSMISSION PROBLEM. A LOCK UP OCCUR DUE TO A PROBLEM IN THE SOLENOID IN THE TRANSMISSION. THIS CAR HAD A RECALL BEFORE FOR THE TRANSMISSION. IT WAS REPLACED, HOWEVER. IT HAS NEW ISSUE. MANY PEOPLE SUFFER FROM THIS PROBLEM. *TR
NHTSA ID
10410301
Incident
Mar 14, 2011
Mileage
184,000 mi
Transmission
Filed Feb 7, 2011
PURCHASED 2001 ACURA 3.2 CL TYPE-S (REPLACING MY FIRST ACURA 3.2CL THAT WAS TOTALED IN A 1/2009 CRASH) ON 3/2009 AS SECOND OWNER FROM ACURA DEALERSHIP WITH 35,232 MILES. GOT ALL SERVICE RECORDS FOR THIS AUTOMOBILE FROM DEALER INCLUDING THE RECORD DATED 9/9/04 (MILEAGE 14,660) FOR THE INSTALLATION OF THE OIL JET KIT DURING TRANSMISSION RECALL. WHILE DRIVING HOME ON THE HIGHWAY THIS EVENING, THE ENGINE AND VEHICLE STABILITY ASSIST (VSA) SYSTEM LIGHTS CAME ON AND STAYED ON. WHEN I FINALLY STOPPED AT A LIGHT AND THEN PROCESSED THROUGH IT AT A NORMAL SLOW SPEED, THE TACHOMETER JUMPED FROM 2,000 TO 4,000 RPMS WHILE IN FIRST GEAR. LUCKILY, I WAS WITHIN A FEW BLOCKS OF MY DESTINATION. WHEN I RETURNED TO VEHICLE TO DRIVE HOME, CAR WOULD NOT SHIFT OUT OF FIRST GEAR. I HAD TO PARK THE CAR ON A CITY STREET THAT SAME NIGHT. I HADN'T EXPERIENCED ANY TRANSMISSION PROBLEMS UNTIL THIS ONE NIGHT. HAD CAR TOWED TO MY REGULAR MECHANIC THE NEXT DAY ONLY TO BE TOLD IT WAS A TRANSMISSION PROBLEM. CONTACTED LOCAL ACURA DEALER TO BE TOLD THAT MY VEHICLE WAS OUT OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD AND THEY TENTATIVELY OFFERED A GOOD WILL SPLIT OF THE COST. (I HAD BOUGHT MY FIRST NEW 2001 ACURA 3.2CL FROM THEM AND THEY HAD INSTALLED A NEW TRANSMISSION DURING THE EARLIER RECALL.) HAD VEHICLE TOWED TO A NATIONWIDE TRANSMISSION SPECIALIST SHOP. THEY DETERMINED THAT TRANSMISSION HAD TO BE COMPLETELY OVERHAULED. AGREED TO HAVE IT REPAIRED AND THEY USED NEW FACTORY PARTS AND HONDA GENUINE AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION FLUID (ATF-Z1). AFTER COMPLETION AND PAYMENT, I WAS ADVISED TO DRAIN AND REFILL FLUID EVERY 15,000 MILES AND FLUSH TRANSMISSION SYSTEM USING ATF-Z1 EVERY 30,000 MILES. I HAD NEVER BEEN TOLD THIS TRANSMISSION SERVICING SCHEDULE BY MY ORIGINAL LOCAL ACURA SERVICE DEPARTMENT CONSULTANTS. OWNER MANUAL STATES CHANGING THE FLUID AT 45,000 MILES OR 36 MONTHS IN THEIR MAINTENANCE SCHEDULE FOR DRIVING IN NORMAL CONDITIONS. VEHICLE HAD 58,300 MILES WHEN THIS PROBLEM OCCURRED. *TR
NHTSA ID
10381071
Incident
Jan 24, 2011
Mileage
58,300 mi
Transmission
Filed Nov 22, 2010
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 ACURA 3.2CL. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHEN SHE DROVE IN SECOND GEAR, THE VEHICLE SEEMED TO BUCKLE. SHE WOULD HAVE TO LET HER FOOT OFF THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL IN ORDER FOR IT TO GAIN MOMENTUM. OTHER TIMES, IT WOULD NOT CONNECT INTO THE SECOND OR THIRD GEAR. THE VEHICLE HAD PREVIOUSLY BEEN REPAIRED ACCORDING TO RECALL 04V176000 (POWER TRAIN: AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION) AND THE DEALER REFUSED TO REPAIR IT AGAIN. THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER HAD NOT BEEN NOTIFIED. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 205,000. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 198,000.
NHTSA ID
10367134
Incident
Jul 26, 2010
Mileage
198,000 mi
Transmission
Filed Sep 14, 2010
I HAVE A 2001 ACURA 3.2 CL JUST DAYS BEFORE MY BIRTHDAY THE TRANSMISSION STARTED TO SLIP I TOOK IT TO ACURA DEALER AND THEY INFORMED ME THAT THE TRANSMISSION WILL HAVE TO BE REPLACED AT OWNERS EXPENSE ($4800) AND THEY ALSO INFORMED ME THAT NO GOODWILL GESTURE WILL BE EXERCISED BECAUSE VEHICLE IS OUT OF WARRANTY I AM THE 2ND OWNER OF THIS CAR SINCE LATE 08 AND HAD NO IDEA OF THE ISSUES I AM STILL PAYING FOR THE CAR AND IT IS MY ONLY TRANSPORTATION. I DO NOT KNOW HOW I WILL BE ABLE TO AFFORD BOTH THE CAR AND TRANSMISSION AND THERE IS NO WAY FOR ME TO SELL IT THIS CAR NOT ONLY NEARLY KILLED ME BUT IS NOW DRAINING ME FINANCIALLY (DUE TO ACURA NOT REPLACING A CLEARLY FAULTY TRANSMISSION) AND I AM NOW STUCK NOT BEING ABLE TO WORK AND COULD LOSE MY JOB THIS IS A HUGE PROBLEM FOR ME I EVEN HAD TO QUIT SCHOOL!!! *TR
NHTSA ID
10355585
Incident
Sep 12, 2010
Mileage
175,000 mi
Transmission
Filed Aug 17, 2010
WHILE DRIVING MY 2001 ACURA CL TYPE S TO WORK (ABOUT 10 MILES) MY CAR WOULD NOT GO ABOVE 45 MPH, THEN ONLY 30 MPH, BUT WAS ABLE TO MAKE IT INTO THE PARKING LOT. AN HOUR LATER WANTED TO TAKE THE CAR TO AN AUTO SHOP AND ALL SEEMED NORMAL UNTIL ABOUT 6 MILES AFTER WHEN THE CAR WOULD NO LONGER MOVE (ENGINE STILL RUNNING OK). TRIED ALL GEARS BUT TO NO AVAIL. LET THE CAR SIT FOR 10 MINUTES AND CAR WORKED OK AGAIN AND WAS ABLE TO DRIVE IT TO THE AUTO REPAIR SHOP. THE NEXT DAY THEY CALLED AND STATED THE TRANSMISSION IS "SHOT". ALL CLUTCHES ARE BAD. THEY INSTALLED A JASPER REMANUFACTURED TRANSMISSION. I WAS TOLD THAT ACURA ONLY USED THIS TRANSMISSION TYPE FOR THE 2001 MODEL. IT WAS THE FIRST YEAR FOR THAT TRANSMISSION AND THE LAST YEAR. I ASSUME THERE WERE A LOT OF PROBLEMS WITH IT AND ACURA WENT TO A DIFFERENT TRANSMISSION FOR THE 2002 MODEL YEAR. IT COST ME $4500 TO REPLACE THE TRANSMISSION. I HAD ABOUT 102,000 MILES ON THE CAR AT THE TIME OF THIS FAILURE. NOTE: THERE WAS A RECALL ON THE TRANSMISSION FROM ACURA AND I DID BRING THE CAR BACK TO ACURA FOR THE RECALL NOTICE. *TR
NHTSA ID
10349985
Incident
Jun 3, 2010
Mileage
102,175 mi
Transmission
Filed Jul 8, 2010
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 ACURA 3.2CL. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 60 MPH THE VEHICLE BEGAN TO SHAKE VIOLENTLY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER WHERE THE MOTOR MOUNTS WERE REPLACED. THE CONTACT ALSO STATED THAT THE VEHICLE HAD ALWAYS EXPERIENCED TRANSMISSION FAILURES AND THAT THE TRANSMISSION WAS REPLACED THREE TIMES. THE VEHICLE WOULD INTERMITTENTLY SLIP OUT OF THIRD GEAR WHILE DRIVING. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 216,000.
NHTSA ID
10341984
Incident
Jul 8, 2009
Mileage
216,000 mi
Transmission
Filed Jun 10, 2010
TRANSMISSION FAILURE AT ANY SPEED IN THE ACURA CL 3.2 TYPE S. *TR
NHTSA ID
10335734
Incident
Jun 10, 2010
Mileage
94,000 mi
Transmission
Filed May 9, 2010
2001 ACURA CLS (VIN [XXX]). WHEN PULLING OUT ONTO A MAJOR ROAD (55MPH) WITH ONCOMING TRAFFIC THE CAR PAUSED AS THE TRANS SLIPPED, THE ENGINE REVVED TO 5000 RPM, THE TRANS THEN LOCKED INTO GEAR, THE TIRES SQUEALED AND THE CAR LURCHED FORWARD. THANK GOD THAT MY WIFE DIDN'T RUN INTO SOMEONE OR LOSE CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE. NOW I READ THAT THIS IS COMMON WITH THIS MODEL YEAR AND TRANSMISSION. THE NHTSA KNEW OF THE PROBLEM AND A CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT WAS OFFERED. HOWEVER NOTHING WAS DONE TO MAKE OWNERS AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC SAFER. IT SEEMS TO ME THAT AT A MINIMUM THE NHTSA SHOULD HAVE MANDATED ACURA TO WARN OWNERS, AND MANDATE ACURA TO PERFORM MORE ROUTINE INSPECTIONS ON THIS POORLY DESIGNED TRANSMISSION, AND PERHAPS MORE FREQUENT FLUID CHANGES. I READ THAT THE NHTSA WAS CONSIDERING ADDITIONAL ACTION ON THIS ISSUE AND HOPE YOU DO. THIS INCIDENT OCCURRED WITH NO PRIOR WARNING. ALLOWING A 240 HP CAR ON THE ROAD WITH THIS TYPE OF KNOWN FAILURE IS UNSAFE TO OWNERS AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC IN MY VIEW. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR
NHTSA ID
10329442
Incident
May 3, 2010
Mileage
69,500 mi
Transmission
Filed Mar 11, 2010
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 ACURA CL. WHILE DRIVING AT 45 MPH THE TRANSMISSION BEGAN MAKING A LOUD NOISE. THE VEHICLE BEGAN TO LOSE POWER AND WOULD NOT MOVE FORWARD. HE WAS ABLE TO MANEUVER OFF THE HIGHWAY AND HAD THE VEHICLE TOWED TO THE NEAREST DEALER. A DIAGNOSTIC WAS PERFORMED AND IT WAS VERIFIED THAT THE TRANSMISSION HAD FAILED. THE TRANSMISSION WAS REPLACED AT THE OWNER'S EXPENSE. THERE WERE NO RECALLS ON THE VEHICLE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 70,000 AND THE CURRENT WAS 72,000. UODATED 05/13/10.*LJ
NHTSA ID
10318911
Incident
Dec 18, 2009
Mileage
70,000 mi
Transmission
Filed Jan 23, 2010
I HAVE A 2001 ACURA CL-S, HAVING SEVERE PROBLEMS WITH THE TRANSMISSION. THERE WAS A RECALL, BUT THEY SAY IT IS OUT OF WARRANTY, BY TIME. PROBLEM IS WHEN I BOUGHT THE CAR 2 YEARS AGO I BROUGHT THIS TO SOMEONE'S ATTENTION AT ACURA , AND WAS PUSHED AWAY AS IF I KNEW NOTHING, AND NOW THEY WANT TO CHARGE ME CLOSE TO $5000 TO REPLACE THE TRANSMISSION. *TR
NHTSA ID
10302056
Incident
Jan 5, 2010
Mileage
65,000 mi
Transmission
Filed Nov 17, 2009
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 ACURA 3.2CL. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 55 MPH ON NORMAL ROAD CONDITIONS, THE TRANSMISSION BEGAN TO SLIP WITHOUT WARNING. THE ENGINE REVVED EXCESSIVELY HIGH. THE FAILURE OCCURRED INTERMITTENTLY. THE DRIVER WAS ABLE TO CONTINUE DRIVING NORMALLY. AN AUTHORIZED MECHANIC STATED THAT THE FAILURE WAS CONTRIBUTED TO THE THIRD GEAR CLUTCH PACK. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE CONTACT HAD CONCERNS OF THE SAFETY RISK INVOLVED. THE VIN WAS REJECTED FROM SYSTEM. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 58,985. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 59,000.
NHTSA ID
10292496
Incident
Oct 10, 2009
Mileage
58,985 mi
Transmission
Filed Oct 7, 2009
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 ACURA 3.2CL. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 20 MPH, THE VEHICLE INTERMITTENTLY DOWN-SHIFTS. A TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THE FAILURE OCCURS BETWEEN THE SECOND AND THIRD GEAR. HE ALSO NOTICED THAT THE TRANSMISSION FLUID WAS DISCOLORED; HOWEVER, SINCE THE WARRANTY EXPIRED THEY WOULD NOT PROVIDE A FREE REMEDY. NO REPAIRS WERE MADE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 98,090.
NHTSA ID
10286641
Incident
Dec 16, 2006
Mileage
98,090 mi
Transmission
Filed Aug 10, 2009
2001 ACURA CL 3.2 AUTOMATIC TRANSMISSION, ACCELERATING INTO THE FREEWAY AND IT AUTOMATICALLY SHIFTED INTO NEUTRAL. PUSHED THE GAS AND IT WOULDN'T ACCELERATE AND THE ENGINE REVVED UP. THE DRIVE WAS STILL IN D5. CAR IN THE BACK ALMOST HIT ME. *TR
NHTSA ID
10279938
Incident
Aug 3, 2009
Mileage
104,000 mi
Transmission
Filed Jul 17, 2009
NOW ON 3RD TRANSMISSION. 2ND OWNER REPLACED UNDER WARRANTY ABOUT 9 MOS. PRIOR TO MY PURCHASE (I AM 3RD OWNER). TRANSMISSION BLEW ABOUT 1 YEAR AFTER I PURCHASED THE CAR AND I PURCHASED NEW TRANSMISSION THROUGH ACURA WHO OFFERED ABSOLUTELY NO ASSISTANCE EVEN THOUGH THIS IS A KNOWN DEFECT. WHEN THE TRANSMISSION FAILED, WE WERE TRAVELING ON A HIGHWAY AT APPROX. 65 MPH AND CAR VIOLENTLY DOWNSHIFTED, NEARLY CAUSING LOSS OF CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE. ACURA IS NOT TAKING RESPONSIBILITY FOR THESE TRANSMISSIONS. THE TRANSMISSION THAT THE 2ND OWNER HAD PUT IN WAS A TRANSMISSION THAT SUPPOSEDLY HAD BEEN MANUFACTURED TO CORRECT THE KNOWN PROBLEM. OBVIOUSLY NOT, SINCE THE THING BLEW WITH ONLY 77K MILES ON IT! 152K MILES ON THIS CAR AND 3 TRANSMISSIONS. RIDICULOUS. *TR
NHTSA ID
10277094
Incident
Jul 18, 2008
Mileage
152,000 mi
Transmission
Filed Jul 6, 2009
CAR SUDDENLY SLIPPING OUT OF GEAR, REVVING WITH NO ACCELERATION, 3 DAYS LATER THE ENGINE CUT OFF IN THE MIDDLE OF A VERY BUSY INTERSECTION, SIMPLY PUT I COULD HAVE DIED THAT DAY. THE TRANSMISSION FAILED AND NEEDED REPLACING. I PAID FOR A BRAND NEW ONE ABOUT 5K. *TR
NHTSA ID
10275924
Incident
Jun 26, 2009
Mileage
86,436 mi
Transmission
Filed Jul 5, 2009
I PURCHASED NEW, A 2001 ACURA CLS, AND GAVE IT TO MY MOTHER, ABOUT YEAR LATER IN 2002. AT ONLY 39,620 MILES THE TRANSMISSION STARTED TO SEVERELY SLIP, AND REQUIRED TOWING TO THE ACURA DEALERSHIP, WHERE, AT A COST OF $5,076.66, REQUIRED REPLACING THE COMPLETE TRANSMISSION AND ECU. THE DEALER SERVICE DEPARTMENT ASSOCIATE COULD EXPLAIN SPECIFICALLY WHAT CAUSED THIS DAMAGE. *TR
NHTSA ID
10275786
Incident
Mar 7, 2009
Mileage
39,620 mi
Transmission
Filed Jun 2, 2009
PURCHASED 2001 ACURA CL-3.2 ON 12/02 AS SECOND OWNER FROM ACURA DEALERSHIP WITH 46,570 ON THE ODOMETER. NOTICED SLIGHT TRANSMISSION SLIPPAGE 02/03. HAD VEHICLE SERVICED AND TRANSMISSION REPLACED UNDER WARRANTY WITH. RECEIVED LETTER DATED SUMMER 2004 OF TRANSMISSION RECALL. TOOK VEHICLE TO DEALER ON ACCORDANCE TO RECALL LETTER. DEALER INSTALLED OIL JET KIT. ON 05/23/09 (136,000 ON THE ODOMETER), TRAVELING APPROX. 70 MPH ON INTERSTATE, D5 STARTED FLASHING. MINUTES LATER, THE VEHICLE DOWNSHIFTED AND THE TCS INDICATED CAME ON. THE VEHICLE REPEATED THIS DOWNSHIFTING AGAIN WHILE ATTEMPTING TO MOVE FROM THE CENTER LANE TO THE FAR RIGHT LANE CAUSING THE WHEELS TO LOCK EXPERIENCING VIOLENT JERKING MOTIONS. THE REAR VEHICLE APPROACHING HAD TO MANEUVER TO THE CENTER LANE TO AVOID REAR END COLLISION. PROCEEDED TO ROADSIDE AND PARKED THE VEHICLE. VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO HOME ADDRESS AND PARKED. CALLED AND INFORMED DEALER OF TRANSMISSION ISSUE WHICH HAD SYMPTOMS OF PRIOR RECALL. ALSO CONTACTED ACURA CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS AND WAS REFERRED TO THE DEALERSHIP FOR SERVICING DUE TO THE PRIOR RECALL. DEALER SERVICED VEHICLE ON 05/28/09 (INV# 291814) AND DETERMINED BY DIAGNOSTIC, THE SOLENOIDS MALFUNCTIONED. SOLENOIDS WERE REPLACED BY DEALER AT OWNER EXPENSE AND TEST DRIVEN BY SERVICE CENTER TECHNICIANS RESULTING IN NO RESOLUTION AND PROMPTING ANOTHER DIAGNOSTIC ERROR CODE. IT WAS DETERMINED BY THE TECHNICIANS THAT THE TRANSMISSION WAS EXPERIENCING UNKNOWN SYMPTOMS AND RECOMMENDED THE TRANSMISSION BE REPLACED FOR A SECOND TIME. DUE TO VEHICLE BEING OUT OF WARRANTY AND EXTENDED WARRANTY, DEALER WILL NOT OFFER GOOD FAITH GESTURE OR GOODWILL DEALER REPLACEMENT. VEHICLE WAS SERVICED AT RECOMMENDED MANUFACTURES INTERVALS. SERVICE HISTORY WAS PROVIDED TO DEALER BY OWNER. *TR
NHTSA ID
10272688
Incident
May 23, 2009
Mileage
136,000 mi
Other / unspecifiedTransmission
Filed Mar 7, 2009
THE TRANSMISSION ON MY ACURA CL-S WAS REPLACED @ 66K MILES UNDER THE RECALL. I JUST TOOK THE CAR IN FOR SERVICE (@132K MILES) AND THEY INFORMED ME IT NEEDS THE TRANSMISSION REPLACED AGAIN. I HAVE TO BUY TIRES AND BRAKES AS OFTEN AS TRANSMISSIONS AT THIS RATE. *TR
NHTSA ID
10261046
Incident
Mar 6, 2009
Mileage
132,000 mi
Transmission
Filed Jan 3, 2009
TRANSMISSION DOES NOT SHIFT FROM FIRST TO SECOND GEAR RESULTING IN HIGH RPM STATUS. *TR
NHTSA ID
10253651
Incident
Oct 10, 2008
Mileage
79,000 mi
Transmission
Filed Nov 18, 2008
Crash reported1 injury reported
I OWN A 2001 ACURA CL. I WAS DRIVING IN TO THE DRIVEWAY, WHEN WITHOUT WARNING, THE TRANSMISSION ACCELERATED, BRAKES WOULD NOT OPERATE NORMALLY AND THE CAR HIT THE DRIVEWAY WALL VIOLENTLY WITH CONCOMITANT ABNORMAL SPEED. I CHALKED IT UP TO A ONE TIME EVENT. THE CAR SUSTAINED $6,000 IN FRONT DAMAGE. TODAY, LIKEWISE, AS I WAS DRIVING IN TO THE DRIVEWAY, THE CAR AGAIN STARTED ACCELERATING ON ITS OWN AND I ALMOST RAMMED IN TO THE NEIGHBORS ADJOINING FENCE/TREE. UPON REVIEW OF ALL THE COMPLAINTS LODGED AGAINST ACURA FOR TRANSMISSION FAILURE ON THIS PARTICULAR MODEL, I CAME TO REALIZE THAT THE VEHICLE IS OBVIOUSLY DEFECTIVE IN NORMAL TRANSMISSION OPERATION. I WAS NEVER NOTIFIED BY THE DEALER TO HAVE THE CAR CHECKED DUE TO EFFECTIVE RECALL ON TRANSMISSION FAILURES/OPERATION. MY ATTORNEY ADVISES ME TO PROCEED WITH LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. OBVIOUSLY, ACURA SHOULD BE NOTIFIED OF HORRIFIC CONSEQUENCES OF PERSONAL INJURIES AND PROPERTY DAMAGES THAT A DEFECTIVE TRANSMISSION NECESSARILY ENTAILS UNDER OTHERWISE NORMAL OPERATING CONDITIONS. *TR
NHTSA ID
10249112
Incident
Nov 1, 2008
Mileage
32,000 mi
Transmission
Filed Oct 1, 2008
WHEN WE HEARD ABOUT THE RECALL, WE TOOK THE CAR IN TO HAVE THE RECALL PROBLEM FIXED. WE TOOK IT TO SIERRA ACURA ON MAIN STREET IN ALHAMBRA, CALIFORNIA. WE WERE TOLD BY THE SERVICE DEPARTMENT TO BRING THE CAR BACK WHEN THE RECALL PROBLEM STARTS GIVING US TROUBLE. SO WE WAITED UNTIL IT GAVE US TROUBLE WHICH WAS AROUND MONDAY SEPTEMBER 29, 2008. WE TRIED TO TAKE IT TO SIERRA ACURA YESTERDAY AROUND 3:30 P.M. WE WERE TOLD TO BRING IT BACK THE NEXT DAY BECAUSE THEY WERE CLOSING IN ABOUT AN HOUR. WE COULD HAVE GOTTEN THE CAR THERE IN ABOUT 15 MINUTES, AND WERE WILLING TO LEAVE IT THERE UNTIL IT WAS FIXED. SO, WE WERE VERY DISGUSTED WITH THE SERVICE THERE AND TOOK IT TO ANOTHER DEALER THOMAS ACURA IN COVINA. THEY TOLD MY SON WHO IS THE DRIVER OF THE CAR THAT HE WOULD HAVE TO PAY 75% OF THE COST WHICH IS ABOUT $4,000.00 BECAUSE HE BROUGHT IT IN PAST THE DUE DATE OF THE RECALL. FIRST OF ALL, WE NEVER GOT A RECALL NOTICE SO WE DIDN'T KNOW WHEN THE DATE OF THE RECALL NOTICE WAS. WE HEARD ABOUT THE RECALL BY WORD OF MOUTH. SECOND, WHEN WE DID TAKE THE CAR IN A TIMELY MANNER, THEY TOLD US TO BRING IT BACK WHEN THE TRANSMISSION STARTS GIVING US TROUBLE. THIRD NOW WE HAVE TO PAY 75% OF THE COST BECAUSE OF THE ERROR OF THE ACURA SERVICE DEPARTMENT . *TR
NHTSA ID
10244166
Incident
Sep 29, 2008
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.
Other components reported on this vehicle
Categories with enough reports to have a page of their own