RoadVitals

2015 Acura MDX Body & structure Problems

Owner-reported complaints naming the body or structure system, filed with NHTSA

Data refreshed

Body & structure reportsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
8
Latest Jan 16, 2025
Share of all reportsThis category as a share of every owner report on file for this model year. One report can name more than one component, so the categories overlap.
11%
of 70 total
Crash or fire reportedReports in this category whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. The reporter's own answer on the NHTSA form, not a verified finding.
1
Injuries or deaths reportedTotals the submitters entered on their own reports in this category. Not verified by NHTSA and not a casualty statistic.
0

What this page shows

Reports naming the vehicle structure, frame, body panels, doors, hood and trim. Every record below is an owner-reported complaint about the 2015 Acura MDX submitted to NHTSA — not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. 8 reports on file name it.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Owner reports naming body or structure

Shown in the owner’s own words, exactly as filed

Body & structure
Filed Jan 16, 2025

Paint peeling on roof (white diamond pearl paint).

NHTSA ID
11636349
Incident
Jan 14, 2025
Body & structure
Filed Mar 18, 2024

See attached letter for complaint

NHTSA ID
11578083
Incident
Sep 1, 2023
Body & structure
Filed Apr 9, 2020

I WAS DRIVING 80 MPH ON THE HIGHWAY WHEN THE PASSENGER SIDE WINDSHIELD GARNISH FLEW OFF THE CAR. AFTER INSPECTION, IT APPEARS THE CLIPS THAT HOLD THE GARNISH ON WERE BROKEN.

NHTSA ID
11320641
Incident
Apr 8, 2020
Mileage
92,000 mi
Body & structureElectrical
Filed Sep 11, 2018
Fire reported

VEHICLE HAD NUMEROUS PROBLEMS THROUGHOUT THE FIRST TWO YEARS OF OWNERSHIP, WHICH THE DEALERSHIP WAS VISITED FOR REPEATEDLY. THESE PROBLEMS OCCURRED WHEN THE WEATHER WAS VERY COLD, USUALLY BELOW ZERO (F), AND INVOLVED MULTIPLE DISFUNCTIONAL SENSORS ALL DISPLAYING INOPERATIVE. WHEN THESE SENSORS DISPLAYED ERRORS, THAT COMPONENT OF THE CAR WOULD NOT FUNCTION CORRECTLY. (ONE TIME THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH THE COLLISION MITIGATING SYSTEM, AND THE BRAKES AUTOMATICALLY ENGAGED ON AN ICY ROAD AT FULL SPEED--ANOTHER THERE WAS A PROBLEM WITH THE AWD WHICH TURNED THE VEHICLE INTO A FRONT WHEEL DRIVE OPERATION). DEALERSHIP DISCOVERED AFTER MULTIPLE VISITS, AND WHEN WE TOLD THEM WE WERE GOING TO TRY TO PURSUE A LEMON LAW PROTECTION ON THE VEHICLE, THAT IT WAS A POWER CONTROL MODULE THAT WAS BAD. THIS WAS REPLACED. VEHICLE RAN MOSTLY ERROR FREE FOR SOME TIME AFTER. ON THE MORNING OF 2/15/2018, THE VEHICLE WAS STARTED IN ORDER TO WARM UP. WHILE PARKED WITH THE ENGINE RUNNING, VEHICLE CAUGHT ON FIRE SOMEWHERE BEHIND THE DASH ON THE PASSENGER SIDE. WE PUT THE FIRE OUT USING A FIRE EXTINGUISHER. THANKFULLY, I WAS NOT DRIVING THE VEHICLE AS I WOULD HAVE BEEN 5 MINUTES LATER, AS I HAD NO FIRE EXTINGUISHER IN THE CAR; AND ALSO THANKFULLY THERE WAS NOT GOING TO BE A PASSENGER IF I HAD BEEN DRIVING, AS THE FLASH WAS IMMEDIATE AND INTENSE ON THE PASSENGER SIDE. FURTHER, IT DID NOT CATCH OUR HOUSE OR SHOP ON FIRE WHEN IT WENT, AS IT COULD HAVE. VEHICLE WAS A TOTAL LOSS. DOCUMENTATION OF NUMEROUS PROBLEMS (RECEIPTS OF VISITS TO DEALERSHIP) AND PHOTOS OF DAMAGE TO CAR AFTER FIRE ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.

NHTSA ID
11128827
Incident
Feb 15, 2018
Mileage
85,000 mi
Body & structureElectrical
Filed Aug 12, 2018

AUTOMATIC SAFETY DOOR RELOCK FAULTY. THE REMOTE WAS USED TO UNLOCK THE DOORS. THE REAR DOOR WAS OPENED AND THE BABY WAS PLACED IN THE CAR SEAT. THE DIAPER BAG WAS THEN PLACED ON THE FLOOR OF THE BACK SEAT. DOORS AUTOMATICALLY RE-LOCKED AFTER 30 SECONDS WITH BABY AND CAR KEYS STUCK INSIDE. 911 WAS CALLED TO RESCUE THE BABY AND BUST OPEN THE DOOR. THIS SHOULD ABSOLUTELY NEVER HAPPEN. AFTER CHANGING THE SETTINGS TO 90 SECONDS, THE CAR STILL LOCKS AT 30. ACURA DENIES HEARING THIS HAPPEN. ACURA SAYS THERE IS NO WAY TO DISABLE THIS "FEATURE".

NHTSA ID
11119473
Incident
Mar 21, 2018
Body & structure
Filed Aug 10, 2015

1.TAIL GATE ISSUE: AFTER PURCHASING THE BRAND NEW ACURA MDX, NEXT MORNING I SAW TAIL GATE WAS OPEN BY ITSELF. I ASSUMED I MIGHT HAVE UNKNOWINGLY PUSHED THE WRONG BUTTON. FEW WEEKS LATER, MY WIFE SAW THE TAIL GATE OPEN IN HER GARAGE. WE AGAIN THOUGHT SOMETHING ON OUR END. FEW WEEKS LATER, MY WIFE'S CO WORKER SENDS HER TEXT SHOWING THE TAIL GATE BEING OPEN , WHILE MY WIFE WAS NOT PRESENT IN THE BUILDING. IN ONE OCCASION WHEN I WAS AT TARGET, I CAME OUT SAW MY TAILGATE OPEN. AT LEAST 8 OCCURRENCES HAD TAKEN PLACE IN LAST 8 MONTHS. AND ACURA HAS BEEN UNABLE TO LOCATE THE ISSUE. 2.BODY ISSUE FEW MONTHS LATER WE NOTICED THE VEHICLE'S EXTERIOR STARTED TO SEPARATE FROM ITS BODY. WE TOOK THE CAR TO THE ACURA MCCHURCHILL , FORTWORTH. THEY SAID THERE WAS AN ISSUE WITH HOW MANUFACURERS APPLIED THE GLUE. AND PROMISED THE ROOT PROBLEM IS RECOGNIZED AND FIXED. AFTER 2 WEEKS, THE INTERIOR WAS SEPARATING OUT FROM THE BODY. WE HAVE OUR CHILD IN OUR CAR, AT THIS POINT WE DID NOT FEEL SAFE TO DRIVE THIS VEHICLE. WE TOOK THE CAR TO ACURA MCCHURCHILL , FORTHWORTH, THEY ACKNOWLEDGED THE ISSUE. WE REQUESTED THEM TO EXCHANGE OUR CAR TO ANY OTHER USED CAR, SAME YEAR MAKE/MODEL/MILEAGE.THE REPRESENTATIVE SAID THEY HAVE 2016 MODEL, WE CAN LEAVE OUR CAR AND BUY NEW CAR. BY THAT TIME THEY HAD CLEARLY SEEN OUR FEAR OF DRIVING THE OLD CAR. THEY TOOK ADVANTAGE OF THE SITUATION AND PROVIDED OPTION-EITHER BUY A NEW CAR OR TAKE THE UNSAFE CAR. THE STATEMENT THEIR SALES REPRESENTATIVE MADE WAS "SOMEONE HAS TO TAKE THE LOSS, WE CANT TAKE IT ALL" KBB VALUE WAS $40,000.00. THEY GAVE US $34000.00 AS THE TRADE VALUE.THEY KEPT SAYING "YOU ARE GETTING 2016 CAR" BUT THE PRICE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 2015 AND 2016 IS ONLY 150 DOLLARS. AND WE DID NOT NEED A NEW CAR. WE JUST NEEDED A SAFE CAR. WE DIDN'T HAVE ANY OTHER CHOICE EXCEPT BUYING NEW CAR AND BE SAFE ON THE ROAD.

NHTSA ID
10747690
Incident
Oct 1, 2014
Mileage
50 mi
Body & structure
Filed May 30, 2015

I OWN A 2015 ACURA MDX THAT IS THREE MONTHS OLD AND IT HAS 4000 MILES ON IT. I WAS DRIVING THIS CAR EARLY IN THE MORNING WHEN I PRESSED THE BUTTON TO OPEN THE MOONROOF, IT VIOLENTLY EXPLODED CAUSING GLASS TO SHOWER UPON ME. I HAVE SUFFERED CUTS ON MY HAND AND ON MY HEAD AS A RESULT OF THIS. I HAVE CONTACTED TWO DIFFERENT HOUSTON ACURA DEALERS ONLY TO FIND OUT THAT THEY ARE NOT WILLING TO FIX THE REPAIR AS ACURA WILL NOT APPROVE THE REPAIR COST. ONE DEALER EVEN ADMITTED THAT ACURA IS AWARE OF THE ISSUE. I WISH THAT ACURA WOULD STAND BEHIND THEIR PRODUCT AND RESOLVE THE ISSUE PROMPTLY. IT COULD HAVE RESULTED IN A SERIOUS ACCIDENT OR WOULD HAVE INJURED MY CHILDREN AS WELL IF THEY WERE PRESENT IN THE CAR.

NHTSA ID
10722449
Incident
May 30, 2015
Mileage
4,000 mi
Body & structure
Filed Nov 12, 2014

MY NEW 2015 MDX HAS AN IMPROPERLY INSTALLED ROOF PANEL OR IMPROPERLY PLACED MOUNTING POINTS THAT ARE PART OF THE ROOF PANEL. I FOUND THE PROBLEM BECAUSE OF A GAPS BETWEEN THE FRONT AND REAR ROOF MOLDINGS, THE WINDSHIELD AND FRONT MOLDING AND THE REAR MOLDING WAS UNSECURED, FLAPPING AND HANGING OVER TOWARDS THE TAILGATE DOOR. I WAS INITIALLY TOLD THAT IT WAS JUST A BROKEN CLIP BUT AFTER ORDERING NEW CLIPS AND NEW MOLDINGS SEVERAL TIMES THEY DETERMINED THAT THE MOUNTING DOWELS ARE IN THE WRONG PLACE ON ONE SIDE OF THE VEHICLE AND THEY SUGGEST I LET THEM CUT, WELD AND REPAINT THE ROOF OF MY BRAND NEW MDX. IT HAS TAKEN ACURA ALMOST 4 MONTHS TO REACH THIS DECISION. MY CAR HAS BEEN THE SHOP OVER THREE WEEKS IN COMBINED DAYS. MY CONCERN ASIDE FROM HAVING MY NEW VEHICLE REPAINTED IS THAT IF THEIR AUTOMATED ASSEMBLY PROCESS CAUSED THIS DEFECT WHAT OTHER DEFECTS MIGHT HAVE BEEN CAUSED AT THE SAME TIME AND HAVE NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED. HOW DID THIS VEHICLE PASS ACURA'S QUALITY CONTROL? WHAT COULD BE THE CONSEQUENCE OF THESE POTENTIAL DEFECTS. ACURA HAS DONE NOTHING TO EXPLAIN OR DETERMINE IF THERE COULD BE OTHER ISSUES THAT MIGHT EFFECT THE SAFETY OR LONGEVITY OF THE VEHICLE. THEY DID NOT EVEN ENGINEER THE SOLUTION THEMSELVES, THEY HAD A LOCAL BODY SHOP DETERMINE HOW TO RELOCATE THE INCORRECTLY INSTALLED PARTS.. I HAVE FILED A FORMAL COMPLAINT WITH ACURA CUSTOMER RELATIONS AND THEY HAVE REFUSED TO PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE OR A DETAILED WRITTEN EXPLANATION OF THE PROPOSED WORK TO BE DONE. THE CUSTOMER RELATIONS DEPARTMENT SHOULD BE CALLED ACURA DEFENSE DEPARTMENT. I HAD HOPED THAT THE NUMEROUS COMPLAINTS FILED ON THIS SITE AND ELSEWHERE REGARDING THE 2014 MDX ASSEMBLY PROBLEMS WOULD BE RESOLVED IN THE 2015 MODEL. NO SUCH LUCK. BUYER BEWARE UNLESS YOU ARE READY TO HAVE YOUR BRAND NEW MDX REPAINTED! *TR

NHTSA ID
10654617
Incident
Jul 23, 2014
Mileage
48 mi

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Other components reported on this vehicle

Categories with enough reports to have a page of their own

Elsewhere on this vehicle

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .