Reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers, shown in full
Data refreshed
Our database holds 7 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2001 Bounder Motorhome. Each one is a report filed by an owner or driver and published by NHTSA without most of them being verified. A complaint is not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. Narratives are shown exactly as filed.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Showing 1–7 of 7
DRIVER AND PASSENGER SIDE DUAL PANE WINDOWS ARE FOGGING AND OBSTRUCTING VISION TO THE POINT I CAN NOT SEE REARVIEW MIRRORS. THIS WILL REQUIRE REPLACEMENT OF WINDOWS. *TR
IN SEPTEMBER 2006 , DESPITE REPEATED DOWNSHIFTING ON HILLS, AS IS THE RECOMMENDED STANDARD DRIVING PRACTICE, I STILL EXPERIENCED A LACK OF BRAKING WHICH LED TO MECHANICAL FAILURE. THE ABS LIGHT CAME ON AND I EXPERIENCED A LACK OF BRAKING POWER WITH THE PEDAL HAVING TO BE COMPRESSED COMPLETELY TO THE FLOOR IN ORDER TO SLOW THE RV. THE ABS LIGHT REMAINED ON FOR THE DURATION OF MY SHORT TRIP. THE BRAKES FELT "MUSHY" AT THAT TIME. I TOOK THE RV TO A SERVICE CENTER WHO DIAGNOSED THAT THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKE SENSORS HAD "FRIED" AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. AT THE TIME OF THIS TRIP, THE RV HAD ONLY 3789 MILES ON IT. THE CONSEQUENCES OF THIS ENGINEERING DEFECT ARE THAT WE WERE CHARGED $867.08 TO REPAIR THE REAR SENSOR SPEED SIGNAL AND THE ANTI LOCK BRAKE COMPUTER/SENSORS. THIS TRIP OCCURRED AFTER SERVICE BULLETIN 50401-C RELATED TO SAFETY CONCERNS ON BOSCH BRAKE CALIPERS HAD BEEN COMPLETED BY BEAUDRY RV SERVICE CENTER IN SAN MARCOS, CA. IT IS MY OPINION THAT THIS ENGINEERING DESIGN DEFECT COULD LEAD TO SERIOUS SAFETY CONCERNS INCLUDING FIRE, PROPERTY DAMAGE, INJURY OR DEATH TO THE OCCUPANTS OF THE RV AND THAT OWNERS OF THE SUSPECT VEHICLES SHOULD RECEIVE REIMBURSEMENT FOR THE MONEY THAT HAS ALREADY BEEN SPENT TO REPAIR THE PROBLEM AS WELL AS PAYMENT FOR FUTURE ENGINEERING UPGRADES TO PERMANENTLY RESOLVE THIS DEFECT AND THE ASSURANCE THAT THE MOTORHOME WILL BE RESTORED TO A SAFE AND MECHANICALLY SOUND RECREATIONAL VEHICLE. *TR
TIRE BLOW OUT AT 60MPH ON I-75, GEORGIA @ EXIT 39 ALL TIRES CHECKED BEFORE LEAVING ON TRIP AND HAD 102PSI. TIRES HAD ALWAY HAD 102 PSI SINCE NEW. MOTORHOME RUNNING 4000LBS BELOW MAX WEIGHT. NO CORNER HEAVY. CORRECT TIRE SIZE IS: 255 R 80 22.5
I HAVE A 2001 BOUNDER DIESEL MOTORHOME WITH MICHELIN XRV 255/80R22.5 TIRES. WITHIN A SIX MONTH PERIOD FROM APRIL TO OCTOBER 2004, FOUR OF THE ORIGINAL SIX TIRES ON THE MOTORHOME HAD BLOWOUTS BETWEEN 27,000 AND 33,000 MILES. ALL FOUR BLOWOUTS WERE SIDEWALL FAILURES CHARACTERIZED BY A "ZIPPER-RIP" ON THE SIDE OF THE TIRE. ALL BLOWOUTS WERE ON REAR TIRES OCCURRING AT SPEEDS BETWEEN 55 AND 70 MPH. AIR PRESSURE IS CHECKED REGULARLY AT THE BEGINNING OF THE DAY. WEIGHT OF MOTORHOME IS WELL WITHIN TIRE SPECIFICATIONS (I HAD EACH CORNER OF THE MOTORHOME WEIGHED SEPARATELY). SINCE ALL TIRES HAD A SIMILAR TYPE OF BLOWOUT WITHIN A RELATIVELY SHORT PERIOD, I'M QUESTIONING THE SAFETY AND SUITABILITY OF THE MICHELIN XRV TIRES FOR MOTORHOME USAGE. DOT NUMBERS OF TIRES THAT HAD BLOWOUTS NOT RECORDER BUT DOT NUMBERS OF THE REMAINING TWO ORIGINAL EQUIPMENT TIRES ARE B6H6AK3X1700 AND B6H6AK3X2000.
WHILE DRIVING MY 2001 BOUNDER DIESEL THROUGH CRESTLINE, OH, I STOPPED AT A TRAFFIC LIGHT AND THE RIGHT FRONT TIRE'S SIDEWALL BLEW OUT. NO ADDITIONAL DAMAGE WAS DONE TO THE MOTORHOME. I CALLED A ROADSIDE SERVICE COMPANY AND HAD THE TIRE REPLACED WITH A NEW ONE. THE STEEL IN THE SIDEWALL AT THE BLOWOUT SIGHT WAS RUSTED AWAY. THE TIRE WAS A MICHELIN 255/80R22.5 XRV, DOT B6H6 AK3X2300 WITH 35,292 MILES ON IT. AFTER ARRIVING HOME FROM THE TRIP, I CALLED MICHELIN TO INQUIRE ABOUT WARRANTY COVERAGE. THEY REFERRED ME TO ONE OF SEVERAL DEALERS IN THE AREA. UPON INSPECTION OF THE TIRE, I WAS TOLD MICHELIN WOULD NOT DO ANYTHING ABOUT THE FAILURE, AND THIS IS A FAIRLY COMMON FAILURE FOR THIS TIRE. THE FAILURE WAS ATTRIBUTED TO EITHER UNDER INFLATION, OVER INFLATION OR OVERLOADING (TAKE YOUR CHOICE). THESE ARE NOT VALID ASSERTIONS AS THE TIRE PRESSURE HAS BEEN MAINTAINED WITHIN 5 POUNDS OF MICHELIN'S RECOMMENDED PRESSURES, NOR HAVE THEY BEEN OVERLOADED. I HAVE KEPT THE TIRE FOR INSPECTION BY ANYONE WHO IS INTERESTED. THIS TIRE IS ADVERTISED AS BEING DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR RV USEAGE. AFTER NOTICING THE INORDINATE NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS BOTH ON THREADS ON THE INTERNET AND ON YOUR SITE, IT IS OBVIOUS THEY UTTERLY FAILED IN ACCOUMPLISHING A SAFE DESIGN. THIS TIRE IS DANGEROUS AND SHOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE HIGHWAYS FOR EVERYONE'S SAFETY. MICHELINS DENIAL OF POSSIBLE DEFECT PROBLEMS HAS CHANGED MY MIND ABOUT WHETHER I SHOULD SUPPORT THEIR CORPORATION BY BUYING ANY OF THEIR PRODUCTS IN THE FUTURE.*AK
ON 9/12/03 A RIGHT REAR MITCHELIN TIRE - 255/80R22.5XRV BLEW OUT WHILE TRAVELING. ON 01/04/04 A LEFT REAR MITCHELIN TIRE - 255/80R22.5XRV BLEW OUT WHILE TRAVELING IN THE VERY SAME FASHION. WE ARE TOLD THESE TIRES SHOULD NOT HAVE DONE THAT AND ARE DEFECTIVE. *AK
THE ENGINE BECAME WARM AFTER TOWING 3000-3500 POUNDS.*YH
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.
Data on this page last refreshed .