2019 Cadillac CT6 Problems
Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component
Data refreshed
What this page shows
Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 2019 Cadillac CT6, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Reports by component
Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category
- Powertrain (other)1372.2%
- Brakes211.1%
- Driver assistance15.6%
- Electrical15.6%
- Visibility15.6%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Each component in detail
What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words
Powertrain (other)
Powertrain reports that are not specifically the engine or transmission — driveshafts, axles, transfer cases and differentials.
From owner reports, verbatim
On July 22, 2025, at 20,245 miles, I brought my 2019 Cadillac CT6-V to an authorized dealer while still under factory warranty, reporting hard shifting during both acceleration and deceleration — the exact symptom described in GM Special Coverage Bulletin N242480631, which addresses a defective transmission control valve subject to premature wear (P0747 diagnostic condition). The dealer was unable to diagnose or repair the issue at that visit and returned the vehicle to me without resolving the defect. The same condition recurred. I brought the vehicle back to the dealer (Crestview Cadillac, Rochester Hills, MI) on May 26, 2026. The vehicle remained at the dealership for over three weeks before any loaner vehicle was offered. Replacement parts were reported as received on July 3, 2026, and again on July 17, 2026, and as of this filing the vehicle has still not been returned to me — over two months out of service. The repair estimate is approximately $12,000, covering the transmission control valve, a power transfer case, and a high-pressure oil pump. GM Special Coverage Bulletin N242480631 states that the control valve body replacement is covered at no charge for vehicles that return with a P0747 condition after the TCM software update, for 15 years or 150,000 miles from the in-service date, regardless of ownership. My vehicle meets these conditions. Despite this, GM's case team has offered only a $4,500 "goodwill" credit plus reward points toward the total repair, characterizing this as a discretionary gesture outside of warranty, and has stated this is their final position. I am filing this complaint because: (1) the original recall/coverage remedy did not resolve the underlying defect when I first brought the vehicle in under warranty, resulting in continued use of a vehicle with an unrepaired safety-related transmission defect until the condition worsened; (2) GM's dealer network has taken an extended and, in my view, excessive amount of time to complete.
The contact owns a 2019 Cadillac CT6. The contact stated that while driving approximately 75 MPH, the wheels locked up and the vehicle started swaying from side to side, and the vehicle decelerated. The contact was able to coast to the side of the road and had the vehicle towed to an independent mechanic. The vehicle was diagnosed with rear differential failure, and DTC: P0747 (Transmission Solenoid Stuck Open); was retrieved. The differential was replaced. The contact then received notification of NHTSA Campaign Number: 25V148000 (Power Train); and the vehicle was taken to the dealer and repaired under the recall. The contact stated that after the recall repair, the transmission experienced hard shifting, with the check engine warning light illuminated. The contact stated that the check engine warning light was illuminated before the recall was issued. The vehicle was returned to the dealer, but was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 77,000. The VIN was not available.
Brakes
Reports naming service brakes, the antilock braking system, brake hoses, master cylinders or the parking brake.
From owner reports, verbatim
ABS system error StabiliTrak error Cruise Control error Vehicle with <14,000 miles is exhibiting symptoms of earlier ABS recall.
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2019 CADILLAC CT6. WHILE DRIVING, THE BRAKE SYSTEM FAILED TO ENGAGE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN UNKNOWN DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE BRAKE BOOSTER FAILED AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND PROVIDED CASE NUMBER: 9-5610946955. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 1,800.
Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.
Driver assistance
Reports naming forward-collision avoidance, lane keeping, back-over prevention, cruise control and related electronic driver-assistance systems.
From owner reports, verbatim
ABS system error StabiliTrak error Cruise Control error Vehicle with <14,000 miles is exhibiting symptoms of earlier ABS recall.
Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.
Electrical
Reports naming the electrical system — wiring, battery, charging, control modules, infotainment and electrical accessories.
From owner reports, verbatim
ABS system error StabiliTrak error Cruise Control error Vehicle with <14,000 miles is exhibiting symptoms of earlier ABS recall.
Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.
Visibility
Reports naming windshields, glass, wipers, defrosters and mirrors.
From owner reports, verbatim
HELLO, ON AN ESTIMATED 8+ TIMES, I PUT MY VEHICLE INTO GEAR, DROVE OFF AND BOTH MY SIDE VIEW MIRRORS WERE IN THE CLOSED/UP POSITION. I HAVE LEARNED FROM GM SUPPORT THAT GM DID NOT DEVELOP SOFTWARE WHERE THE MIRRORS AUTOMATICALLY OPEN: WHEN EITHER OPENING THE DOORS OR PUTTING INTO GEAR. THIS IS EXTREMELY DANGEROUS AND I HAD NEVER EXPERIENCED ON MY FORMER MERCEDES E-350 LEASES, THIS SAFETY TECHNOLOGY WAS STANDARD. THE LATEST INCIDENT I WAS DRIVING ON A MAIN WEST TO EAST ROUTE FOR ABOUT 2 MILES, NEEDED TO GET INTO THE RIGHT LANE, WENT TO LOOK AT MY RIGHT MIRROR, AND IT WAS COMPLETELY FOLDED UP. IT WAS VERY, VERY DANGEROUS, ALMOST GOT ME REAR-ENDED SINCE I BRAKED HARD WHEN I NOTICED AND I ALMOST SIDE-SWIPED THE CAR TO MY RIGHT.
Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.
Elsewhere on this vehicle
Data sources
- NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation — owner-reported complaints and the components recorded on them
Data on this page last refreshed .