RoadVitals

2006 Cedar Creek Fifth Wheel Problems

Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component

Data refreshed

Owner complaintsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
5
Latest Apr 25, 2011
Components namedHow many of our component categories appear on at least one report for this model year. One report can name several.
2
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0

What this page shows

Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 2006 Cedar Creek Fifth Wheel, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Reports by component

Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category

  • Tires & wheels360.0%
  • Other / unspecified240.0%

Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.

Each component in detail

What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words

Tires & wheels

Reports naming tires, wheels, hubs, or the tire-pressure monitoring system.

3
reports

From owner reports, verbatim

ON OUR TRIP TO HOUSTON,TX. FROM BRICH RUN, MI. ON APRIL 13, 2011 WHILE TRAVELING SOUTHWEST ON HWY I70 WE HAD A TIRE ON OUR FIFTH WHEEL TRAILER BLOW OUT AND DISINTEGRATE. WE ALSO HAD ANOTHER ONE BLOW ON APRIL 16, 2011 ( FROM A TREAD/BROKEN BELT SEPARATION). THE COST OF THE RESULTING DAMAGE IS NOT KNOWN AT THIS TIME AS THE ESTIMATE IS NOT BACK. BOTH COULD HAVE CAUSED AN ACCIDENT IF ONE WAS NOT EXPERIENCED AT DRIVING WITH A TRAILER. TIRES WERE ST235/85R/ 16D'S BRAND IS RADIAL TRAIL, ULTRA CRT, MADE IN CHINA. *TR

NHTSA ID 10397376 · filed Apr 25, 2011

PURCHASED NEW FOREST RIVER, CEDAR CREEK "SILVERBACK" 5TH WHEEL RV WITH NEW CARLISLE "RADIAL TRAIL, ULTRA CRT" ST235/85R16 TIRES IN NOV. OF 2006. USE ONE YEAR TO ABOUT 5,000 MILES AND BIG CHUNK OF TREAD FELL OF ONE TIRE. WAS ON THE ROAD AND HAD TO CALL RV ROAD SERVICE. THEY FOUND DEFECTS IN ALL TIRES AND DID NOT WANT US TO CONTINUE DRIVING. HE REPLACED ALL TIRES AND GAVE US A DESCRIPTION OF DEFECTS ON OUR STATEMENT. *TR

NHTSA ID 10222725 · filed Mar 30, 2008

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Other / unspecified

Reports whose component NHTSA recorded as unknown, or that do not map to one of the categories above.

2
reports

From owner reports, verbatim

THIS IS REGARDS TO A RECALL NOTICE THAT WAS OBTAINED ON LINE ABOUT A APPLIANCE IN AN RV AND THIS SITE WAS GIVEN. AFTER OUR REFRIGERATOR STOPPED WORKING AND WE LOST ALL OF OUR FOOD DUE TO THE UNIT NOT TURNING BACK ON EITHER WITH ELECTRIC OR LP GAS WE TRIED TO GO THROUGH OUR EXTENDED SERVICE CONTRACT WHICH WE PAID FOR. WE HAD A SERVICE REP COME OUT AND ADVISE THAT OUR UNIT WAS PART OF THE RECALL DID NOT ADVISE AS TO WHAT TO DO FOR THE RECALL BUT ADVISED THAT OUR COOLING UNIT NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. WE THEN WENT ON LINE TO VERIFY THAT OUR UNIT WAS PART OF THE RECALL THAT ADVISED THAT WE NEED TO SHUT IT DOWN IMMEDIATELY 1) DO NOT OPERATE WITH LP GAS AND DO NOT HAVE IT RUN ON ELECTRIC UNLESS NECESSARY AND DO NOT OPERATE UNIT WHILE OCCUPANTS ARE ASLEEP. THIS WAS PART OF A RECALL FROM04/2008 WE NEVER RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE SO THE UNIT RAN FROM 04/2008 UNTIL 11/2008 AND THEN FROM 04/2009 UNTIL IT STOPPED RUNNING 05/2009 AL THE WHILE MY FAMILY WAS USING AND SLEEPING IN UNIT. THE MANUFACTURER WITH THE WARRANTY ADVISED SINCE THE UNIT IS NOT CURRENTLY WORKING THEY CAN NOT REPLACE WHAT IS WRONG AND THEY DO NOT BELIEVE THAT CAUSE OF THE UNIT TO STOP RUNNING IS DUE TO THE RECALL EVEN THOUGH THE BACK OR SIDES HAVE A YELLOW RESIDUE AND IT IS NOT PROPERLY COOLING WHICH IS 2 OF THE 4 ISSUES THAT ARE WRONG. THE MANUFACTURE WILL NOT LOOK AT IT AND THE SERVICE COMPANY ADVISED THAT THEY WILL ONLY REPAIR WITH REFURBISHED PARTS THAT ARE THE REASONABLE PRICE BASED UPON THE NATIONALLY FLAT RATE FACTORY MANUALS COST. NOW MY SUMMER HAS BEEN RUINED I AM OUT MORE FOR A SERVICE CONTRACT THAT WILL NOT ASSIST A MANUFACTURER THAT WILL NOT ASSIST EVEN TO MAIL OUT THE RECALL ITSELF AND I AM AFRAID OF WHAT COULD OF HAPPEN TO MY FAMILY AS WELL AS WHAT HEALTH RISKS WE TOOK BY STAYING IN AN UNSAFE ENVIRONMENT. I AM LOOKING FOR SOME HELP I THOUGHT THAT I WAS PURCHASING QUALITY ITEMS FOR THE PRICE PAID FOR THE CONTRACT AND VEHICLE. PLEASE HELP!!!! *TR

NHTSA ID 10278720 · filed Jul 29, 2009

THE GAS ALARM DID NOT SOUND EVEN THOUGH THE TRAILER WAS SO FULL OF PROPANE WE FELT SICK BREATHING IT JUST A FEW SECONDS AS WE OPENED WINDOWS, ETC. I HAD REMOVED ONE PROPANE TANK EARLY IN THE DAY TO TAKE IT FOR REFILLING. BASED ON THE OPERATING INSTRUCTIONS, I THOUGHT THE REGULATOR WOULD PREVENT GAS FLOW FROM ONE TANK OUT THE HOSE TO THE OTHER TANK. ABOUT 2 WEEKS AFTER THIS THE LOW BATTERY ALARM SOUNDED UNTIL WE CHANGED THE POSITION OF THE BATTERY DISCONNECT SWITCH. THERE IS NO INFORMATION ON HOW THE ALARM IS WIRED OR HOW IT WORKS IN THE TRAILER OWNER DOCUMENTATION. I HAVE NO FAITH IN THE DEVICE. *JB

NHTSA ID 10183143 · filed Feb 21, 2007

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Elsewhere on this vehicle

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .