RoadVitals

1990 Chrysler New Yorker Salon Owner Complaints

Reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers, shown in full

Data refreshed

Complaints on fileComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
2
Latest Nov 11, 2004
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0
Filed in the last 12 monthsReports filed with NHTSA in the trailing 365 days. Recent volume reflects attention and vehicle age as much as anything else.
0
Reports on file since Mar 31, 2003

What this page shows

Our database holds 2 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 1990 Chrysler New Yorker Salon. Each one is a report filed by an owner or driver and published by NHTSA without most of them being verified. A complaint is not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. Narratives are shown exactly as filed.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Complaints, most recent first

Showing 1–2 of 2

Electrical
Filed Nov 11, 2004

UNPERFORMED RECALL : NHTSA CAMPAIGN #91V004000. THE SERV. MGR. AT NEVADA AUTO MALL TOLD ME HE NEEDED TO VOID THE WORK ORDER BECAUSE HE DID NOT HAVE TIME TO WORK ON MY CAR BUT IT WOULD BE OKAY TO DRIVE. I WAS AT THAT TIME EMPLOYED BY NEVADA AUTO MALL, BUT IN THE INTERIM, I WAS FIRED FROM MY JOB, AND MY CAR RELEASED TO ME WITHOUT THE SAFETY RECALL BEING PERFORMED. MY CAR'S ELECTRICAL SYSTEM HAS NOW SHORTED OUT, DIRECTLY RESULTING FROM THIS UNPERFORMED RECALL, AND I AM UNABLE TO DRIVE IT. I CONTACTED CHRYSLER CUSTOMER ASSISTANCE AND SPOKE TO CAMERON. HE SAID THAT NEVADA AUTO MALL REPORTED THE RECALL BEING PERFORMED ON MY CAR JUNE 14, 2004. THIS IS FRAUD!! NOT ONLY DID THEY NOT PERFORM THE RECALL (THEY NEVER HAD MY CAR IN THEIR SHOP THIS ENTIRE YEAR!), BUT THEY ALSO CHARGED CHRYSLER FOR A RECALL THEY NEVER PERFORMED! I SPOKE WITH SEAN AT CUSTOMER SERVICE TODAY AND HE SAID THAT CHRYSLER HAD SENT ME AN E-MAIL ON NOV. 9 STATING THIS IS BASICALLY NOT THEIR PROBLEM AND THAT I SHOULD TAKE IT UP WITH THE DEALERSHIP. SINCE THE DEALERSHIP IS AN "AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE" OF CHRYSLER, I BELIEVE IT TO BE AS MUCH THEIR PROBLEM AS IT IS THE DEALERSHIP'S. I NEVER RECEIVED THE E-MAIL THEY SUPPOSEDLY SENT ME AND WHEN I ASKED "SEAN" TO RE-SEND IT, HE SAID HE WOULD HAVE TO FIND SOMEONE WHO COULD RE-SEND IT TO ME AS HE COULD NOT DO IT. NOR COULD HE PRINT IT OUT AND FAX IT TO ME. "SEAN" ALSO TOLD ME THAT THIS WAS NOT A SAFETY RECALL, JUST A REGULAR RECALL. ANOTHER LIE!! I PRINTED OUT A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL LETTER SENT TO THE DIR. OF AUTOMOTIVE SAFETY PLANNING AND COMPLIANCE WITH CHRYSLER CORP. FROM THE CHIEF OF DEFECTS INVESTIGATION ENFORCEMENT WHICH CLEARLY STATES SAFETY RECALL. *JB

NHTSA ID
10098666
Incident
Nov 8, 2004
Brakes
Filed Mar 31, 2003

THE MASTER CYLINDER AND ROTORS WERE REPLACED SEVERAL TIMES. *JB

NHTSA ID
10014821
Incident
Mar 31, 2003

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .