RoadVitals

1992 Chrysler New Yorker Salon Problems

Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component

Data refreshed

Owner complaintsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
1
Latest Jan 30, 2006
Components namedHow many of our component categories appear on at least one report for this model year. One report can name several.
1
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0

What this page shows

Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 1992 Chrysler New Yorker Salon, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Reports by component

Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category

  • Fuel system1100.0%

Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.

Each component in detail

What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words

Fuel system

Reports naming fuel storage or delivery — tanks, pumps, lines, injectors and fuel leaks.

1
report

From owner reports, verbatim

THE EVENT OF SMELLING GASOLINE WHENEVER HEAT WAS TURNED ON IN CAR AND THE SMELL OF GASOLINE WHEN EXITING CAR. FUMES WERE VERY STRONG. CAR TAKEN TO PROCARE AUTOMOTIVE, AND MECHANIC INVESTIGATED AND DETERMINED FUEL RAIL WAS DEFECTIVE. WAS TOLD DANGER IN DRIVING BECAUSE FUEL WAS RUNNING DOWN ON ENGINE BLOCK AND COULD HAVE CAUGHT ON FIRE. DESIGN OF PUTTING THE FUEL RAIL ON TOP OF BLOCK WAS DANGEROUS. THE FUEL RAIL AND INJECTOR ASSEMBLY HAD TO BE REPLACED. THE AMOUNT OF THIS WAS OVER $650.00. NO MECHANIC COULD TELL US WHY THIS HAPPENED. THIS WAS A SAFETY ISSUE, IT COULD HAVE CAUGHT ON FIRE WHILE DRIVING ON ROAD. *AK

NHTSA ID 10148972 · filed Jan 30, 2006

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Elsewhere on this vehicle

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .