RoadVitals

2012 Evenflo Embrace

Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data

Owner complaintsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
0
Safety recallsA safety recall is issued when a manufacturer or NHTSA determines that a vehicle has a safety-related defect or does not comply with a federal motor vehicle safety standard. Recall repairs are free. Whether a specific vehicle is covered depends on its VIN — a recall listed for a model year does not necessarily apply to every vehicle of that year.
0
InvestigationsNHTSA opens an investigation to examine whether a safety defect may exist. An open investigation is not a determination that a defect exists, and many investigations close without a recall. Investigations can, however, lead to one.
1
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0

Overview

Our database contains no NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2012 Evenflo Embrace. 1 NHTSA investigation names it.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Safety recalls

No recalls in our database for this model year

That does not guarantee a specific vehicle is unaffected — recalls are issued against VINs, and new campaigns are announced regularly. Check a VIN on NHTSA.gov.

Safety investigations

NHTSA inquiries naming this vehicle. An investigation is not a finding of a defect.

EA14003ClosedEngineering Analysis

Car Seat Harness Buckle

Opened Jul 7, 2014
Closed Oct 31, 2014

On January 31, 2014, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened this investigation as PE14-003 based on 18 reports from consumers alleging the harness buckle on their convertible or booster car seat was difficult to unlatch or would not unlatch. Separately, ODI's investigation of harness buckles (see EA13-001) in Graco Children's Products, Inc. (Graco), revealed that the Evenflo Company, Inc. (Evenflo) also used ?QT1 and ?QT3 harness buckles supplied by AmSafe Commercial Products, Inc. in car seats that Evenflo produced.On February 7, 2014 Graco submitted a Defect Information Report (DIR) to recall approximately 3.7 million Graco convertible and booster car seats produced with QT1 and QT3 buckles. Graco did not, at that time, recall its Rear Facing Infant (RFI) seats that used the same buckles.On April 2, 2014, Evenflo submitted a DIR to recall approximately 1.3 million convertible and booster car seats produced with QT1 and QT3 buckles. Like Graco, Evenflo excluded its RFIcar seats from this recall.On June 27, 2014, Graco submitted a DIR which expanded its earlier recall to include approximately 1.9 million Graco RFI car seats produced with QT1 buckles. Graco also committed to conduct a Customer Service Campaign with notification to registered consumers to replace the QT3 harness buckles.On July 7, 2014 ODI upgraded this investigation to Engineering Analysis EA14-003 to continue its investigation concerning Evenflo's RFI car seats. On August 29, 2014, in response to an ODI information request, Evenflo disputed that a safety risk was present in the buckles and claimed that in an emergency situation the entire car seat could be removed from the vehicle, with the child inside.On October 14, 2014, the Agency contacted Evenflo, and advised that the Agency was prepared to send a Recall Request Letter if the company did not recall the RFI. As stated to Evenflo, it was the Agency's position that the car seats should be recalled because the same QT1 buckles had already been recalled by Graco in its RFI; the complaint data was sufficient to warrant a recall; and, there was no evidence that any differences in the configuration of Evenflo RFI compared to Graco's RFI had an impact on the functioning of the buckle. The Agency had previously described to Evenflo its serious concerns about the inherent safety risk present when a child in an RFI needed to be quickly removed from a vehicle due to an emergency situation and the buckle was difficult to or would not open.On October 20, 2014, Evenflo submitted a DIR recalling 202,346 RFI car seats produced with the QT1 buckles. In its chronology, Evenflo states that the company had received 10 consumer complaints of difficulty opening the buckle. However, at the time the DIR was submitted the Agency was aware of 71 unique complaints submitted to Evenflo and there were two additional complaints made directly to the Agency. The DIR also stated that Evenflo would conduct a Customer Awareness Campaign (CAC) to replace the QT3 buckles used on the non-recalled RFI models. Registered owners of both the recalled seats and the seats covered by the CAC will receive notification letters informing them of the recall and CAC action. Evenflo's two recalls and CAC action covers all Evenflo car seats produced with QT1 and QT3 buckles. Evenflo's DIR states that it voluntarily recalled its convertible and booster seats in April 2014. Under the National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act, a manufacturer of an item of replacement equipment is, in fact, obligated to provide notice once the manufacturer learns that the item of equipment contains a defect related to motor vehicle safety. See 49 U.S.C.

CHILD SEAT:HARNESS/CROTCH BUCKLELed to recall 14C006000

Recent owner complaints

Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words

No owner complaints recorded for this model year

Either none have been filed with NHTSA, or this vehicle is too new for reports to have accumulated.

Compare model years

Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model

Evenflo Embrace by model year
YearComplaintsRecallsInvestigationsIssue Index
2012Viewing001
2011001

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.