Reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers, shown in full
Data refreshed
Our database holds 29 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 1997 Fleetwood Bounder. Each one is a report filed by an owner or driver and published by NHTSA without most of them being verified. A complaint is not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. Narratives are shown exactly as filed.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Showing 1–25 of 29 · page 1 of 2
THE SIDE WINDOWS HAVE LOST THE SEAL AND ARE NOW BEYOND REPAIR . VISIBILITY IS IMPOSSIBLE. TRIED TO FIND THE WINDOWS AND IS IMPOSSIBLE TO FIND.SEEMS ODD THAT THIS HAS BEEN WRITTEN UP MANY TIMES.OWNED THIS VEHICLE FOR TEN YEARS AND THIS STARTED AFTER SECOND YEAR OF OWNERSHIP. *JS
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1997 FLEETWOOD BOUNDER. THE CONTACT REFERENCED NHTSA RECALL CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER: 97V178000, EQUIPMENT:MECHANICAL:JACKS. THE VEHICLE WAS PURCHASED USED IN 2000 AND THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE RECALL WORK WAS PERFORMED. WHILE INSPECTING HE FOUND SEVERAL CRACKED HOSES AND FLUID LEAKING FROM THE ENGINE. HE CALLED THE MANUFACTURER AND THEY WOULD NOT ASSUME LIABILITY FOR THE REPAIRS. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 18,500.
IN OCTOBER 2004 I BOUGHT 4 BIG O LT235/85R16 TIRES FOR MY MOTOR HOME. IN OCTOBER 2005, AFTER PUTTING ON ABOUT 16,000 MILES, THE TREAD CAME OFF OF ONE OF THE TIRES WHILE TRAVELING ABOUT 60 MPH. FIVE MONTHS LATER, BUT ONLY 1,000 MILES MORE, THE SECOND TIRE LOST IT TREAD. ONE HUNDRED MILES LATER THE THIRD TIRE LOST ITS TREAD. IN ALL THREE CASES THERE WAS TOTAL SEPARATION OF THE TREAD FROM THE CARCASS, JUST LIKE THE SEMI TRUCKS LOSING THE TREAD ON A RE-TREADED TIRE. AS A RESULT OF THESE INCIDENTS, CONSIDERABLE DAMAGE WAS DONE TO THE UNDERSIDE OF THE MOTOR HOME, INCLUDING RUPTURE OF A PROPANE LINE, WHICH COULD HAVE RESULTED IN A MAJOR FIRE. *TR
I OWN A 1997 FLEETWOOD BOUNDER. THE DRIVERS SIDE WINDOW HAS BECAME CLOUDED AT DIFFERENT TIMES OF THE DAY AND TRAVEL DIRECTION IT IS ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO SEE OUT INTO THE REAR VIEW MIRRORS. THERE HAS BEEN NO ACCIDENTS YET, AND IT IS EXTREMELY DIFFICULT TO SEE OUT. *TR
THE PARKING BRAKE ON MY 1997 BOUNDER MOTOR HOME THAT'S BUILT ON A CHEVROLET P-30 CHASSIS WILL FAIL WITHOUT WARNING & ALLOW THE COACH TO ROLL. IT HAS BEEN REBUILT & WORKS MOST OF THE TIME. IT'S THAT ONE TIME IT WON'T WORK THAT WORRIES ME. I AM USING WHEEL CHAULKS WHENEVER I PARK IT. *TR. UPDATED 01/11/08. *LJ UPDATED *JB
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1997 FLEETWOOD BOUNDER. APPROXIMATELY THREE YEARS AGO,THE CONTACT BEGAN EXPERIENCED VISIBILITY PROBLEMS WITH THE DRIVER SIDE WINDOW. HE STATED THAT THE WINDOWS WERE DUAL, INSULATED PANE, AND THE GLASS SEALS HAVE FAILED, CAUSING POOR VISIBILITY WHILE DRIVING. THE CONTACT'S VEHICLE HAD THE SAME FAILURE WITH THE PASSENGER'S SIDE WINDOW. HE STATED THAT THERE WAS A GROWTH BETWEEN THE PANES THAT HAD A CLEAR CRYSTAL LOOK, AND PRODUCED A FOGGY LOOK ON THE WINDOW. THE CONTACT INSISTED THAT THESE WINDOWS SHOULD BE OF A BETTER QUALITY AND NOT USE DUAL PANES THAT CRACK AND CAUSE POOR VISIBILITY. THE CONTACT STATED THAT A COMPLAINT WAS PREVIOUSLY MADE FOR THE SAME YEAR, MAKE, AND MODEL WITH ODI # 10043211 (VISIBILITY:GLASS, SIDE/REAR). THE CURRENT MILEAGE IS 37,000 AND FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 30,000.*AK
MY COMPLAINT DOES NOT INVOLVE AN ACCIDENT BUT DOES INVOLVE A FAILURE TO ACT (BY FLEETWOOD MOTORHOME CO.) AND RECTIFY WHAT I FEEL IS A MAJOR SAFETY ISSUE WITH MY MOTORHOME. I PURCHASED MY 1997 FLEETWOOD BOUNDER NEW IN 1997 AND HAVE BEEN TRYING TO GET FLEETWOOD TO RECOGNIZE THAT THE FIRE ESCAPE WINDOW IN MY MOTORHOME IS SORELY INADEQUATE. THEY MERELY PLACED A DECAL THAT READS "FIRE EXIT" ON A STANDARD WINDOW AND EXPECT THAT TO SUFFICE. A NORMAL FIRE ESCAPE WINDOW HAS TWO RED HANDLES THAT SECURE THE WINDOW FRAME DURING NORMAL OPERATION AND CAN ALSO BE TURNED TO UNLATCH THE WINDOW FRAME FOR EGRESS IN THE EVENT OF A FIRE. I CONTACTED FLEETWOOD ABOUT THIS PROBLEM AND THEY HAD ME GO TO A LOCAL AUTHORIZED FLEETWOOD REPAIR FACILITY WHERE A SERVICE MANAGER TOOK PICTURES OF MY WINDOW AND SENT THEM TO FLEETWOOD. FLEETWOOD RESPONDED TO THEM , AND THEY TO ME, THAT I HAVE THE CORRECT CONFIGURATION. LAST WEEK I WENT TO A RV SHOW WHERE THERE WERE NEW AND USED BOUNDERS ON SALE. THE NEW BOUNDER HAD THE CORRECT FIRE ESCAPE WINDOW (RED RELEASE HANDLES). IN ANOTHER BOUNDER (USED) THAT WAS A YEAR OR SO NEWER THAN MINE THERE WAS NO REAL FIRE ESCAPE WINDOW. IT WAS UN-EQUIPPED, JUST LIKE MINE. IN THE EVENT OF A FIRE, AN OLDER COUPLE SUCH AS MY WIFE AND I, WOULD HAVE GREAT DIFFICULTY EXITING THE VEHICLE. I FEAR THAT WE WOULD SURELY SUSTAIN SEVERE BURNS AT THE VERY LEAST. SINCE THERE WERE OTHER MOTORHOMES IN MY MOTORHOME'S ERA WITH THE SAME PROBLEM, MANY PEOPLE COULD BE AT RISK. I WOULD APPRECIATE IT IF YOU COULD RESOLVE THIS PUBLIC DANGER. THANK YOU. *NM
WHEN DRIVING OVER BUMPS IN THE ROAD THE STEERING COLUMN BECAME DIFFICULT TO MANEUVER. . PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. *JB
PROBLEMS WITH EXHAUST MANIFOLD AND HEAD GASKET.*MR THE VEHICLE EXHAUST MANIFOLD MADE NOISE WHILE DRIVING. SEVERAL ATTEMPTS AT HAVE THE PROBLEM RESOLVED HAS AILED. THE CONSUMER SPOKE WITH SEVERAL OTHER PEOPLE WHO ALSO HAVE MOTORHOMES WITH LOW MILEAGE 460 FORD ENGINE'S. THE CONSUMER CONTACTED FORD CUSTOMER SERVICE WHO INDICATED THAT RUST WAS THE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM. THE REPRESENTATIVE WENT ON TO SAY THAT HE BANKS HEADER SYSTEM WAS THE CURE WHICH WOULD COST ABOUT $4000. THE CONSUMER HAD THE HEADER SYSTEM INSTALLED AND IT SEEM TO BE WORKING WELL. THE CONSUMER FEELS THAT THE MANUFACTURER KNOWS OF THE FAULTY EXHAUST MANIFOLD BUT CONTINUES TO MANUFACTURE THEM. *NM
CONSUMER HEARD A DISTURBING NOISE COMING FROM EXHAUST MANIFOLD SYSTEM. DEALERSHIP WAS NOTIFIED, BUT DID NOT RESOLVE THE PROBLEM. *AK
BOUGHT BOUNDER NEW IN 1998. IT IS A 1997 MODEL. FORD 460 MOTOR. SINCE WE BOUGHT IT, WE HAD TO HAVE THE TRANSMISSION SEALS REPLACED AT LEAST THREE TIMES, TWO NEW HEADS, ONE NEW MANIFOLD SYSTEM AND THE RADIATOR HAD PROBLEMS. THE LEVELING JACK ALARM WOULDN'T SHUT OFF. NOW, THE TRANSMISSION HAS COMPLETELY FAILED. WE HAD AN EXTENDED WARRANTY, BUT THE INSPECTOR SAYS THAT THERE WAS ANOTHER LEAK IN THE FRONT TRANNY SEAL, AND THAT WAS WHAT CAUSED THE FAILURE OF THE TRANNY AND THEY WON'T COVER THE FAILURE. THE FLUID DRAINED WHEN WE GOT TO OUR DESTINATION, BUT THEY ARE INSISTING THAT WE DROVE IT WITHOUT THE FLUID. NOT SO, AND WE HAVE A WITNESS. ANYWAY, OUR REQUEST IS FOR FORD TO DO SOMETHING ABOUT THIS PROBLEM AS WE HAVE FOUGHT WITH THIS SEAL PROBLEM SINCE WE BOUGHT THE UNIT. IT IS OBVIOUSLY A MANUFACTURE DEFECT. HELP. *JB
TRANSMISSIOIN FAILURE. HAD TO HAVE THE SEALS REPLACED ALMOST FROM THE DAY WE BOUGHT THE UNIT NEW. NOW THE TRANSMISSION HAS TO BE REPLACED. HAD TWO HEADS REPLACED AND AN ENTIRE MANIFOLD SINCE WE BOUGHT IT. HAVE BEEN TOLD BY DEALERS THAT THAT YEAR OF MOTORHOME ENGINE HAD LOTS OF PROBLEMS. ENDED UP WITH A 350 DOLLAR TOWING BILL AND OUT THE USE OF THE MOTORHOME AS WE ARE "NEGOTIATING" WITH THE EXTENDED WARRANTY COMPANY TO SEE IF THEY WILL PAY FOR THE FAILURE.*AK
VEHICLE HAD A TENDENCY TO ROLL DUE TO POOR BRAKE LINE DESIGN. THE BRAKE LINE WAS ONE HALF INCH FROM MANIFOLD. THE MANIFOLD MELTED THE BRAKE LINE, CAUSING THE BRAKES TO SEIZE. DEALER WAS AWARE OF THE PROBLEM WITH THE BRAKE LINE.*AK
THE VEHICLE HAD A STATE INSPECTION PERFORMED FROM ANOTHER STATE BEFORE THE CONSUMER TOOK OWNERSHIP. THE CONSUMER FELT THAT SOME THINGS WERE OVERLOOKED AT THE TIME OF INSPECTION. *LA THE CONSUMER WAS INFORMED THE VEHICLE HAD MANY PROBLEMS, SUCH AS DEFECTIVE SPEEDOMETER, POOR WINDSHIELD WIPER BLADES, WHICH FAILED TO CLEAN THE WINDSHIELD, AN EXHAUST LEAK WHICH WAS LEAKING AT THE EXHAUST HEADER, A DEFECTIVE REAR ROOF LADDER, AND A IMPROPERLY MISALIGNED STEERING WHEEL. THE CONSUMER NO LONGER OWNS THE RECREATIONAL VEHICLE. *JB
AFTER PUTTING VEHICLE IN PARK IT WILL ROLL. CONTACTED DEALER. DEALER REPLACED SHOE AROUND DRIVESHAFT, BUT PROBLEM IS STILL OCCURRING. *AK CONSUMER STATED WHEN GEAR SHIFT GOES INTO PARK, AUTO PARK DOES NOT ENGAGE, VEHICLE WOULD NOT HOLD, THE DEALER FOUND THE PARK BRAKE SHOES GLAZED AND OUT OF ADJUSTMENT, THE PARK BRAKE CABLE WAS REPLACED.*JB
RIGHT REAR AXLE LEAF SPRING HAS A BROKEN. DEALER NOTICED BROKEN LEAF SPRING DURING INSPECTION. PLEASE ADD FURTHER COMMENTS. *AK
THE CHASSIS SELECTED BY FLEETWOOD IS OF INSUFFICIENT CAPACITY TO SAFELY CARRY THE WEIGHT OF SUCH A LARGE MOTORHOME (34' MOTORHOME ON A CHEVROLET TRUCK P-30), WHILE DRIVING ON IRREGULAR SURFACES AND OVER PASSES CONTROL WAS ALMOST LOST CREATING AN EXTREMELY DANGEROUS SITUATION. NLM
WHEN FOOT IS ON "T"-HANDLE TO RELEASE EMERGENCY BRAKE, WOULD PULL BY HAND, IT WOULD JUMP OUT & COULD BREAK FINGERS. LOCATION IS TOO CLOSE TO FOOT PEDAL. CHEVROLET TRUCK CHASSIS FOR A BOUNDER (MOTORHOME). *AK
SERIOUS SHIMMY IN CHASSIS AT 40/45 MPH. FEEL MOTORHOME COULD LOSE CONTROL AND CAUSE ACCIDENT. DEALER AND MANUFACTURE OF CHASSIS AND MOTORHOME NO RESPONSIVE TO THIS SINCE PURCHASED. ACCIDENT WAITING TO HAPPEN. NEED IT REPORT TO THEM. I AM NOT THE ONLY ONE AS OTHERS HAVE TRIED TO GET FIXED ACCORDING TO DEALER. I REPORTED THIS PREVIOUSLY TO NHTSA. *AK
SHIMMING WAS PRESENT FROM DATE OF PURCHASE. DEALER COULD NOT FIX NOR CAN CHEVY FIX. SERVICED BY TWO LOCAL CHEVY DEALERS. EARNHARDTS FIRST TRIED BY GAVE UP. AFRAID SHIMMY WILL CAUSE MOTORHOME TO GO OUT OF CONTROL,LOOSE A TIRE OR CAUSE STEERING PROBLEMS THAT MANY CAUSE AN ACCIDENT. NUMEROUS THINGS HAVE BEEN DONE TO CORRECT BUT ALL ATTEMPTS HAVE FAILED TO DATE. ONLY HAPPENS BETWEEN 40/45 MPH. VERY COMMON SPEED FOR CITY DRIVING. HELP. *AK
WHEN APPLYING THE BRAKES UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, BRAKES STICK AND WON'T RELEASE. THE PROBLEM WAS REPORTED TO THE FORD MANUFACTURER. REAR BRAKES AND CALIPERS WERE REPAIRED AT OWNER'S EXPENSE. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY FURHTER INFORMATION. *AK
LEVELING JACK HYDRAULIC FLUID RESERVOIR IS MOUNTED DIRECTLY IN FRONT OF THE FRONT TIRE, AND HAS NO PROTECTION FROM THE ELEMENTS THROWN FROM THE TIRE WHICH CAUSES CORROSION ON THE HYDRAULIC LINES. MANUFACTURER HAS BEEN NOTIFIED. *AK
I HAVE A 1996 FLEETWOOD BOUNDER MOTORHOME MODEL 32H ON A FORD F-SUPER DUTY MOTORHOME CHASSIS WITH A 460 CID ENGINE. WITH 12,200 MILES ON THE ODOMETER I WAS DRIVING ON AN INTERSTATE HIGHWAY WHEN I CAME TO TO THE TRANSITION BETWEEN THE HIGHWAY AND THE BRIDGE, THERE WAS A LEVEL CHANGE BETWEEN THE BRIDGE AND THE HIGHWAY. I FELT A SMALL JAR AND IMMEDIATELY THE FRONT END WENT INTO A VIOLENT BACK AND FORTH VIBRATION WITH LOTS OF AMPLITUDE. I THOUGHT THE MOTORHOME WAS GOING TO LEAVE THE FRAME. THE BACK AND FORTH MOTION DID NOT STOP UNTIL I CAME TO A COMPLETE STOP. ABOUT 10-20 MILES FURTHER, THE SAME CONDITIONS RESULTED IN THE SAME VIOLENT REACTION. THE MOTORHOME NOW HAS 15,200 MILE ON IT AND I HAVEN'T HAD THE PROBLEM, HOWEVER I AM AWARE THE PROBLEM EXISTS AND AM VERY CAUTIOUS WHEN I APPROACH A BRIDGE. HOWEVER, I AM CERTAIN IT WILL HAPPEN AGAIN IF A CHUCKHOLE IS ENCOUNTERED. I LIVE IN FEAR THAT I WILL LOSE CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND WILL CAUSE A TERRIBLE ACCIDENT. IT WAS ALL I COULD DO TO HOLD ONTO THE STEERING WHEEL. IF MY WIFE WAS DRIVING IT'S DOUBTFUL SHE COULD HAVE HANDLED IT. I TALKED WITH A FORD REPRESENTATIVE IN ARIZONA, PHONE 1-800-444-3311 EXT 261 AND HE TOLD ME TO HAVE THE WHOLE FRONT END INSPECTED AND TO HAVE THE STEERING STABILIZER REPLACED. THIS PROBLEM OCCURED AT 12,200 MILES. WHAT COULD WEAR AT 12,200 MILES TO CAUSE SUCH A MAJOR PROBLEM? DOES THIS MEAN I SHOULD HAVE THE STEERING STABILIZER REPLACED EVERY 10,000 MILES? OTHER MOTORHOME OWNERS WITH FORD CHASSIS HAVE HAD THE EXACT EXPERIENCE. TO LISTEN TO THEIR STORIES IS SCARRY AS IT'S USUALLY SO IDENTICAL TO WHAT HAPPENED TO ME. I FEEL WHAT THE FORD REPRESENTATIVE TOLD ME IS A SMOKESCREEN. THERE IS AN AFTER-MARKET PRODUCT CALLED A DAVIS TRUTRAC BAR THAT KEEPS THE AXLE FROM SWINGING BACK AND FORTH,THUS ELIMINATING THE PROBLEM. IT COSTS $332.10. FORD SHOULD PAY FOR ITS INSTALLATION OR COME UP WITH A FIX OF THEIR OWN. IT IS A DESIGN FLAW AND SHOULD BE CORRECTED. *AK
FUEL PUMP FAILURE CAUSING ENGINE TO DIE.
WHILE DRIVING AT LOW SPEEDS THE AUTOMATIC PARKING BRAKE ENGAGES, CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO COMPLETELY STOP. PLEASE GIVE ANY FURTHER DETAILS. *AK
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.
Categories with enough reports to have a page of their own
Data on this page last refreshed .