BRAKE LINE PUNCTURES
There is no summary currently available
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Our database contains 9 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 1992 Ford Grand Marquis, most frequently naming the electrical, exterior lighting and brakes categories. 1 NHTSA investigation names it; and 1 manufacturer communication is on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
When owners filed reports about this model year
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 1998 | 1 | 1 |
| Jul 1999 | 1 | 2 |
| Aug 1999 | 1 | 3 |
| Oct 2000 | 1 | 4 |
| Feb 2001 | 1 | 5 |
| Jan 2003 | 1 | 6 |
| Oct 2004 | 1 | 7 |
| Nov 2004 | 1 | 8 |
| Jun 2005 | 1 | 9 |
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
No recalls in our database for this model year
That does not guarantee a specific vehicle is unaffected — recalls are issued against VINs, and new campaigns are announced regularly. Check a VIN on NHTSA.gov.
NHTSA inquiries naming this vehicle. An investigation is not a finding of a defect.
BRAKE LINE PUNCTURES
There is no summary currently available
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
CONTACT STATED CAR GOT BURNT. SHE HEARD THERE WAS A RECALL. SHE NEVER GOT THE RECALL LETTER UNTIL THE CAR BURNT. GOT BURNT ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE. SHE TALKED TO SOMEONE, NAMED JUANITA HILL,WHO TOLD HER SHE WOULD GIVE $825.00 BECAUSE SHE DID NOT HAVE THE MILEAGE AND BECAUSE SHE HAD BOUGHT THE CAR AT SALVAGE. JUANITA HILL HAS TOLD HER SHE WILL NOT GET THE MONEY UNTIL SHE HAS THE CAR TOWED TO FORD. SHE DID NOT WANT TO HAVE TO PAY TO HAVE THE CAR TOWED.*AK
THE PLASTIC LENS THAT COVERED THE HEADLIGHTS BECAME DEFECTIVE AND DETERIORATED, CAUSING POOR VISIBILITY WHILE DRIVING AT NIGHT. DEALER WAS NOTIFIED. *AK
WHILE DRIVING, THE CONSUMER WAS UNABLE TO SEE HOW FAST HE WAS GOING. ANY GLARE THAT ENTERED THE VEHICLE, RENDERED THE CONSUMER NOT BEING ABLE TO READ THE DASHBOARD. *JB
CONSUMER STATES THAT THE GEAR IS STUCK IN PARK. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. TS
BOTH THE LEFT AND RIGHT HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLIES HAVE BEEN REPLACED SEVERAL TIMES DUE TO CONDENSATION BEING PRESENT INSIDE THE LENSE, THE CONSUMER BELIEVES THERE IS A FLAW IN THE HEADLIGHT ASSEMBLIES ESPECIALLY SINCE THE REPLACEMENTS DO NOT CORRECT THE MOISTURE/CONDENSATION PROBLEM. NLM
THE SPARK PLUG WIRES NEEDED REPLACED. *SLC
RECALL REPAIR NOT COMPLETED DUE TO LACK OF PARTS (99V-124). MJS
VEHICLE EXPERIENCED PROBLEMS WITH DEALERSHIP WHEN HAVING RECALL REPAIR (99V-124) NEARLY ONE MONTH FOR REPAIR SERVICE. MJS
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
POWER TRAIN
INFORMATION REGARDING TSB 98-5A-12 (TRANSAXLE/TRANSMISSION/TRANSFER CASE-VEHICLES TOWED BEHIND RECREATIONAL VEHICLES-RECOMMENDED GUIDELINES) DOES NOT LIST TOWING INFORMATION FOR CERTAIN MODEL VEHICLES. *MJS
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.