RoadVitals

NHTSA safety investigation

NHTSA Investigation DP21005

Defect Petition · Generic Manufacturer · ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:CYBERSECURITY

ClosedDefect Petition

An investigation is not a finding that a defect exists.

NHTSA opens an investigation to examine whether a safety defect may exist. An open investigation is not a determination that a defect exists, and many investigations close without a recall. Investigations can, however, lead to one.

Model years namedModel years in our database that NHTSA associated with this inquiry. Being named in an investigation says nothing about whether an individual vehicle has any problem.
2
2 models
Opened
Dec 23, 2021
Defect Petition
Closed
Feb 7, 2022
No associated recall recorded

What NHTSA is examining

The agency's own description of the inquiry, quoted as published

SAE J1939 Data Bus Vulnerability

In a letter dated September 27, 2021, Mr. James Lamb, Executive Director of the Small Business in Transportation Coalition (SBTC), petitioned the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), requesting the initiation of a defect investigation into the potential hacking susceptibility of the Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) J1939 Data Bus standard. SAE J1939 is the vehicle bus recommended practice used for communication and diagnostics among vehicle components. In support of the petition, the petitioner cited a study from University of Michigan (Michigan) researchers alleging a SAE J1939 Data Bus vulnerability in a Model Year (MY) 2001 school bus and a MY 2006 Class-8 semi-tractor. The study alleges that, due to the vulnerability, vehicle critical safety functions such as the accelerator control or braking systems are susceptible to unauthorized access and control and increases risk to motor vehicle safety. On December 23, 2021, the Office of Defects Investigation (ODI) opened DP21-005 to evaluate the petitioner's request. The petitioner did not specify the make and model of the vehicles with the alleged safety defect. The only categories of relevant vehicles specified were found in the study: MY 2001 school buses and MY 2006 Class-8 semi-tractors. ODI has not received any complaints of any type related to this alleged vulnerability (The single complaint identified above is the petition.). This evaluation included searches of complaints from vehicle owners, operators, and fleet supervisors.Further, based on the available information, ODI has not found any similar events/complaints/allegations suggesting a real-life vulnerability. The vehicle compromises reported in the Michigan study required physical access to the J1939 connector in order to affect vehicle critical safety functions such as the accelerator control or braking systems. Whether there is a potential for remote compromise is a factor that NHTSA has considered in evaluating the likelihood or frequency of a potential safety defect. The Michigan study did not demonstrate a remote compromise of these vehicles. In addition, based on the age of the subject model year school buses and semi-tractors, they do not have over-the-air software update capabilities/internet connection to make remote compromise possible. Therefore, given a thorough analysis of the potential for finding a safety-related defect in the subject vehicles, and in view of NHTSA?s enforcement priorities, a defects investigation is unlikely to result in a finding that a defect related to motor vehicle safety exists. NHTSA is authorized to issue an order requiring notification and remedy of a defect if the Agency's investigation shows a defect in the design, construction, or performance of a motor vehicle that presents an unreasonable risk to safety (49 U.S.C. ?? 30102(a)(9), 30118).Given the absence of any similar events/incidents related to this matter and lack of demonstrated potential for remote compromise, it is unlikely that an order concerning the notification and remedy of a safety-related defect would be issued due to any investigation opened as a result of granting this petition. Therefore, upon full consideration of the information presented in the petition, and the potential risks to safety, the petition is denied. The denial of this petition does not foreclose the Agency from taking further action if warranted, or the potential for a future finding that a safety-related defect exists based upon additional information the Agency may receive. A notice of denial of this petition will be published in the Federal Register.

An investigation is a separate record from a recall and from a manufacturer communication. A manufacturer campaign to repair a safety defect or a failure to meet a federal safety standard.

Investigation details

Identifiers, dates and outcome as recorded by NHTSA

Action number
DP21005
Investigation type
Defect Petition (DP)
Status
Closed
Manufacturer
Generic Manufacturer
Component
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:CYBERSECURITY
Opened
Dec 23, 2021
Closed
Feb 7, 2022
Associated recall campaign
None recorded

Vehicles named in this investigation

2 model years across 2 models

Being named here means NHTSA included the vehicle in the scope of its inquiry. It is not a statement that these vehicles have a defect.