RoadVitals

NHTSA safety investigation

NHTSA Investigation EA87015

Engineering Analysis · COSCO, INC. · EQUIPMENT

ClosedEngineering Analysis

An investigation is not a finding that a defect exists.

NHTSA opens an investigation to examine whether a safety defect may exist. An open investigation is not a determination that a defect exists, and many investigations close without a recall. Investigations can, however, lead to one.

Model years namedModel years in our database that NHTSA associated with this inquiry. Being named in an investigation says nothing about whether an individual vehicle has any problem.
4
1 model
Opened
Mar 31, 1987
Engineering Analysis
Closed
Sep 11, 1987
No associated recall recorded

What NHTSA is examining

The agency's own description of the inquiry, quoted as published

CROSS BAR PRESSES NECK

SUMMARY: ON 3/23/87, MR. GREG BERRY, AN EMPLOYEE OF SONOMA COUNTY,CALIFORNIA, CALLED ODI TO REPORT AN ACCIDENT WHICH RESULTED IN AN INFANTFATALITY. THE PRIMARY CAUSE OF DEATH, ACCORDING TO MR. BERRY, APPEARS TOBE NECK COMPRESSION CAUSED BY A CROSS BAR USED ON A FIRST RIDE INFANTSEAT MANUFACTURED BY COSCO.ANALYSIS:ODI INSPECTED A FIRST RIDE INFANT SEAT SUPPLIED BY COSCO.UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS IT APPEARS THAT THE PLASTIC CROSS BAR USEDTO KEEP THE STRAPS POSITIONED COULD CONTACT THE NECK AND CAUSE INJURY.STATUS: COSCO RESPONDED TO THE ODI INFORMATION REQUEST OF 4/3/87 BYLETTER DATED 4/15/87. NO OTHER REPORTS, EA CLOSED ON 9/9/87.===

An investigation is a separate record from a recall and from a manufacturer communication. A manufacturer campaign to repair a safety defect or a failure to meet a federal safety standard.

Investigation details

Identifiers, dates and outcome as recorded by NHTSA

Action number
EA87015
Investigation type
Engineering Analysis (EA)
Status
Closed
Manufacturer
COSCO, INC.
Component
EQUIPMENT
Opened
Mar 31, 1987
Closed
Sep 11, 1987
Associated recall campaign
None recorded

Vehicles named in this investigation

4 model years across 1 model

Being named here means NHTSA included the vehicle in the scope of its inquiry. It is not a statement that these vehicles have a defect.