RoadVitals

NHTSA safety investigation

NHTSA Investigation PE87011

Preliminary Evaluation · BEAMS INDUSTRIES, INC. · UNKNOWN OR OTHER

ClosedPreliminary Evaluation

An investigation is not a finding that a defect exists.

NHTSA opens an investigation to examine whether a safety defect may exist. An open investigation is not a determination that a defect exists, and many investigations close without a recall. Investigations can, however, lead to one.

Model years namedModel years in our database that NHTSA associated with this inquiry. Being named in an investigation says nothing about whether an individual vehicle has any problem.
2
1 model
Opened
Dec 19, 1986
Preliminary Evaluation
Closed
Jul 6, 1987
No associated recall recorded

What NHTSA is examining

The agency's own description of the inquiry, quoted as published

LATCH DISENGAGEMENT

SUMMARY OF INFORMATION FROM MANUFACTURER: BEAM'S REPORTED 14 COMPLAINTS,ONE OF WHICH NHTSA WAS AWARE OF IN FT. MYERS, FL. OF THOSE, 7 RESULTED INLAW SUITS WHERE BEAM'S WAS A DEFENDANT OR CO-DEFENDANT. TWO WERE SETTLEDOUT OF COURT WHILE THE OTHERS ARE PENDING.ANALYSIS: A REVIEW OF BRIEFS FILED BY THE PLANTIFF IN EACH OF THE SEVENCOURT CASES ALONG WITH THE OTHER SEVEN COMPLAINTS, INCLUDING THEINVESTIGATION CONDUCTED BY THE NTSB SHOWED NO CLEAR EVIDENCE THAT THEBEAM'S SEAT BELT BUCKLE ASSEMBLY ACTUALLY FAILED OR MALFUNCTIONED.IN SOME CASES, IT IS NOT CLEAR WHETHER THE SEAT BELT WAS EVEN BEING WORNBY THE VEHICLE OPERATOR. THE CHARGES WERE MORE OF: FAULTY RETRACTORS;DAMAGED OR RUSTY BUCKLES RENDERING THEM UNUSEABLE; AND NEGLIGENCE.ALTHOUGH THE ACCIDENTS WERE NOT CAUSED BY THE LAP BELTS, THE VEHICLEOPERATORS ATTRIBUTED THE INJURIES TO AN ALLEGED LAP BELT/BUCKLEMALFUNCTION.DATA PROVIDED BY BEAM'S SHOWS LABORATORY TEST RESULTS IN WHICH THEEQUIPMENT MET OR EXCEEDED FMVSS.IN REFERENCE TO THE OTHER SEVEN COMPLAINTS OF FAULTY DESIGN OR INADIQUATEPERFORMANCE, BEAM'S APPARENTLY SATISFIED THEM BY REPLACING THE OLD BELTSAND BUCKLES WITH NEW ONES FREE OF CHARGE OR AT MINIMAL COST.THE CANADIAN MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT (CMOT) ISSUED A RECALL OF BEAM'S SEATBELTS IN 1979 FOR A TWO EARED BUCKLE DESIGN, BASED ON THE POSSIBILITYTHAT FALSE LATCH CONDITION MAY BE CREATED WHEN ONLY ONE EAR IS ENGAGED,RESULTING IN A LOWER RESISTANCE TO DETACHMENT. THE LATCHING MECHANISMMANUFACTURED FOR U.S. VEHICLES WERE DESIGNED DIFFERENTLY THAN THOSERECALLED IN CANADA.IN THE CASE OF THE CMOT RECALL, THERE WERE NO INCIDENTS OF MALFUNCTIONOR INJURIES, RATHER THE POSSIBILITY THAT A CONDITION MAY HAVE EXISTEDTHAT COULD HAVE COMPROMISED THEIR EFFECTIVNESS.OBSERVATION: BASED ON THE AVAILABLE INFORMATION, THERE IS NO REASON TOBELIEVE THERE IS AN INHERENT DEFECT IN THE PERFORMANCE, MANUFACTURE, ORMATERIAL OF THE BEAM'S 300 SEAT BELT AND BUCKLE.PROPOSED ACTION: CLOSE THIS PRELIMINARY EVALUATION.===

An investigation is a separate record from a recall and from a manufacturer communication. A manufacturer campaign to repair a safety defect or a failure to meet a federal safety standard.

Investigation details

Identifiers, dates and outcome as recorded by NHTSA

Action number
PE87011
Investigation type
Preliminary Evaluation (PE)
Status
Closed
Manufacturer
BEAMS INDUSTRIES, INC.
Component
UNKNOWN OR OTHER
Opened
Dec 19, 1986
Closed
Jul 6, 1987
Associated recall campaign
None recorded

Vehicles named in this investigation

2 model years across 1 model

Being named here means NHTSA included the vehicle in the scope of its inquiry. It is not a statement that these vehicles have a defect.