RoadVitals

2020 Mercedes-Benz G 550 Owner Complaints

Reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers, shown in full

Data refreshed

Complaints on fileComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
2
Latest Jan 11, 2026
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0
Filed in the last 12 monthsReports filed with NHTSA in the trailing 365 days. Recent volume reflects attention and vehicle age as much as anything else.
1
Reports on file since May 6, 2020

What this page shows

Our database holds 2 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2020 Mercedes-Benz G 550. Each one is a report filed by an owner or driver and published by NHTSA without most of them being verified. A complaint is not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. Narratives are shown exactly as filed.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Complaints, most recent first

Showing 1–2 of 2

Engine
Filed Jan 11, 2026

On this vehicle the oil pump-oil control valve has malfunctioned. The vehicle has 54000 miles on it and the repair costs $8500. The part is only $300 but the transmission must be removed to repair the vehicle. The safety of people is not compromised by the part. The malfunction has been confirmed by the dealer. The malfunction has been reported to mercedes, the warranty company also. The check engine light came on and notified us there was a problem.

NHTSA ID
11710210
Incident
Jan 2, 2026
Filed May 6, 2020

I HAVE A BRAND-NEW VEHICLE THAT WENT INTO A SERIOUS SAFETY RECALL IN FEBRUARY. SINCE BEING NOTIFIED IN EARLY MARCH, THE MANUFACTURER CONTINUES TO SUGGEST THERE IS NOTHING THEY CAN DO TO REMEDY THE SITUATION (NO PARTS AVAILABLE), AND IT IS NOW MAY. WHAT IS MORE CONCERNING IS I AM BEING TOLD TO CONTINUE TO DRIVE THE VEHICLE IF THERE ARE NO SIGNS OF DEFECT (AS IF I AM AN EXPERT). MBUSA KEEPS REFERRING ME BACK TO THE NEW VEHICLE WARRANTY THEY ARE 'HONORING'. UNFORTUNATELY, I DO NOT CARE WHAT IS OUTLINED IN 100 PAGES OF A LEGALLY WRITTEN WARRANTY DOCUMENT. IT IS IMPLIED WHEN A PERSON PURCHASES A NEW VEHICLE, THAT IT WILL NOT GO INTO A MAJOR SAFETY RECALL FOR TWO MONTHS. WHAT I CAN'T SEEM TO UNDERSTAND IS HOW MBUSA IS COMFORTABLE TELLING ME TO CONTINUE TO KEEP DRIVING A DEFECTIVE VEHICLE, KNOWING I HAVE A ONE YEAR OLD IN THE BACKSEAT. SHOULD I ASSUME THE RECALL IS NOT THAT SERIOUS? MBUSA NEEDS TO STEP UP AND DO THE RIGHT THING. THANK YOU, [XXX] INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR

NHTSA ID
11323601
Incident
Mar 9, 2020

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .