Owner-reported complaints naming the brake system, filed with NHTSA
Data refreshed
Brakes reportsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
18
Latest Sep 12, 2025
Share of all reportsThis category as a share of every owner report on file for this model year. One report can name more than one component, so the categories overlap.
4%
of 487 total
Crash or fire reportedReports in this category whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. The reporter's own answer on the NHTSA form, not a verified finding.
5
Injuries or deaths reportedTotals the submitters entered on their own reports in this category. Not verified by NHTSA and not a casualty statistic.
3
What this page shows
Reports naming service brakes, the antilock braking system, brake hoses, master cylinders or the parking brake. Every record below is an owner-reported complaint about the 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis submitted to NHTSA — not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. 18 reports on file name it.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Owner reports naming brake
Shown in the owner’s own words, exactly as filed
Brakes
Filed Sep 12, 2025
My wife has a 2005 Mercury Grand Marquis. This vehicle has what I believe is an extremely unsafe placement of the brake and accelerator pedals. The pedals are extremely close together, closer than I have ever seen on any other vehicle. My wife has depressed the accelerator while pressing the brake pedal on more than one occasion. We went recently for an oil change. The technician pressed the accelerator while pressing the brake pedal while putting the vehicle into reverse. The vehicle lunged into the parking lot. Fortunately, there were no vehicles behind my vehicle. If the technician had been shifting from neutral into drive, he would have driven into the building. The technician said that he has had similar experiences with Ford vehicles and that one of his relatives has a Ford and that this is a frequent experience with that vehicle. I am a disabled Veteran with a below knee amputation of the right leg. I have had no problem driving vehicles before this one. I have stopped driving this vehicle because I believe it is a crash waiting to happen. I have asked numerous people to sit in the vehicle and see if they feel that the pedals are too close together. To date, all have said that they feel that the pedals are too close together and that they would not drive the vehicle in question because they also feel that this vehicle and no doubt other Ford vehicles with this pedal arrangement are crashes waiting to happen. I request that NHTSA look into the pedal arrangement of this vehicle and all Ford vehicles as I believe this arrangement is a safety hazard that is on the highways of America and may have contributed or directly caused numerous crashes since at least 2005.
NHTSA ID
11686834
Incident
Sep 8, 2025
BrakesDriver assistanceEngine
Filed Nov 8, 2024
Fire reported1 injury reported
On [XXX] I was driving this recently purchased Grand marquis . On [XXX] here in San Antonio around ten at night I hit the brakes and something under the hood compartment blew up and it cocked the car . I was trapped inside and when I finally was able to get my seatbelt released I had to break the window with my head . The previous week I reached out to ford and they told me they would address the issue and that they would call me back and that was to no avail. i reached out to ford and at first I was told I would be helped and then a man came on the phone yelling that my vehicle . I need help with resol this issue . My car is totaled and I’m hurting and it’s because of a car with recalls that are a fire haz and dangerous to be put on the road Thank you and God Bless . was not under any recalls The car had been parked for over ten years beca when the orig owner bought it it had issues with the cruise control and the brakes and the engine and the lights . I investigated about and hazards the car was demonstrating and upon further consideration my instinct told me this car was defected and was a big problem waiting to happen INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
NHTSA ID
11624137
Incident
Nov 5, 2024
BrakesEngine
Filed Mar 26, 2024
When i hit the brake pedal,4 times in past month car accelerated briefly then quit. no warning signs no one can tell me what's wrong i read there was a class action lawsuit file years ago for this problem.
NHTSA ID
11579479
Incident
Mar 22, 2024
Brakes
Filed Nov 7, 2023
I had a flat tire well my insurance company sent someone to come and fix it when they got here my car was shut off and in park position, he asked me to press on the parking brake which I did I got out of car shut the door he jacked the car up and the parking brake didn’t hold and the car came down almost on his. I had to get cylinder blocks and put them under the tires while he jacked up the car to fix my flat. Very dangerous
NHTSA ID
11553991
Incident
Nov 7, 2023
BrakesDriver assistanceEngine
Filed May 30, 2019
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. WHILE DRIVING 45 MPH, THE CONTACT ATTEMPTED TO BRAKE, BUT THE VEHICLE ACCELERATED. THE CONTACT SHIFTED THE TRANSMISSION INTO NEUTRAL AND THE VEHICLE STOPPED. THE ENGINE CONTINUED TO REV FOR AWHILE AND THEN THE RPMS SLOWED DOWN TO A NORMAL LEVEL. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE SYMPTOMS DISAPPEARED ON THEIR OWN AND THE VEHICLE OPERATED WITHOUT ANY FAILURES SINCE. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THERE WAS NO RECALL FOR THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 79,000. *BF *TR
NHTSA ID
11210796
Incident
May 9, 2019
Mileage
79,000 mi
Brakes
Filed Mar 2, 2017
Crash reported
VEHICLE WOULD NOT STOP WHEN FOOT BRAKE WAS APPLIED. WHEN BRAKE WAS APPLIED VEHICLE LUNGED FORWARD. DRIVING ON A MAIN ROAD, PASSING THROUGH A SCHOOL ZONE AND APPROACHING A STOP LIGHT. THIS WAS THE SECOND TIME VEHICLE WOULD NOT STOP IN THE PAST TWO MONTHS. I HIT THE REAR OF ANOTHER VEHICLE DAMAGE OCCURED.
NHTSA ID
10957971
Incident
Feb 28, 2017
Mileage
130,000 mi
Brakes
Filed Jun 19, 2012
Crash reported
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE PARKING, HE ATTEMPTED TO APPLY THE BRAKES BUT DEPRESSED THE ACCELERATOR PEDAL INSTEAD. THE CONTACT CRASHED AGAINST ANOTHER VEHICLE AS A RESULT. THERE WAS NO DAMAGE. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE FAILURE WAS DUE TO HOW CLOSE THE PEDALS WERE POSITIONED TO ONE ANOTHER. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO DEALER, WHO OFFERED NO ASSISTANCE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED. THE VIN WAS NOT AVAILABLE. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 18,000.
NHTSA ID
10462292
Incident
Jun 16, 2012
Mileage
18,000 mi
Brakes
Filed Apr 21, 2010
INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6) [XXX] 4/21/2010 2005 MERCURY MARQUIS ON APRIL 17TH 2010, AT APPROXIMATELY 1 PM, AS I HIT THE BRAKES APPROACHING A STOP SIGN, THE BRAKE FAILED AND THE ENGINE RACED, WE TRAVELED ABOUT 14 FEET THROUGH THE STOP SIGN, THE BRAKES WORKED AGAIN AND THE ENGINE DIED DOWN. HAD THERE BEEN A CAR IN FRONT OF ME OR A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING I WOULD HAVE HIT THEM. WE TOOK THE CAR TO A LOCAL SHOP ON THE SAME DAY, THEY DIAGNOSED IT AND COULDN'T FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH IT. ON THE 19TH WE TOOK THE CAR TO A LINCOLN MERCURY DEALER WHO ALSO DID NOT FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE CAR. THEY HAD NO SUGGESTIONS FOR SOLVING THIS DANGEROUS CONDITION. ABOUT 10 DAYS AGO I HAD THE SAME THING OCCUR, HOWEVER, IT WAS NO MORE THEN 1 OR 2 SECONDS AND I WAS ON THE HIGHWAY. RESEARCHING ON THE INTERNET I FOUND A NUMBER OF CASES OF THIS SERIOUS PROBLEM WITH THE MERCURY AND SOME OTHER FORD PRODUCTS. THIS IS VERY SERIOUS AND MUST BE REMEDIED. *TR
NHTSA ID
10326834
Incident
Apr 17, 2010
Mileage
36,000 mi
Brakes
Filed Nov 16, 2009
BOTH FRONT INNER BRAKES NOT PROPERLY CONTACTING ROTOR. ONLY A 1 INCH WIDTH OF INNER BRAKE PADS HAVE EVER CONTACTED ROTOR. BASED UPON THE AMOUNT OF RUST AND PITTING OF THE NON CONTACT AREA OF THE ROTORS IT APPEARS THAT THE BRAKE PADS WERE NEVER CONTACTING PROPERLY. IN ALL MY YEARS OF SERVICING VEHICLES I HAVE NEVER SEEN THIS TYPE OF DEFECT BEFORE. *TR
NHTSA ID
10292275
Incident
Nov 15, 2009
Mileage
35,000 mi
BrakesDriver assistanceTransmission
Filed Aug 20, 2009
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2005 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. WHILE DRIVING 60 MPH, THE TRACKING CONTROL LIGHT AND THE ABS LIGHT ILLUMINATED AND THE VEHICLE BEGAN SHAKING. THE OWNERS MANUAL INDICATED THAT THE CONTROL TRACKING BUTTON WOULD DEACTIVATE IT; HOWEVER, THE LIGHT REMAINED ILLUMINATED. THE DEALER STATED THAT HE COULD DIAGNOSE THE FAILURE. THE CONTACT IS AWARE OF THE SAFETY RISK. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 39450 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 39500. UPDATED 10/5/09 *CN UPDATED 10/07/09.
NHTSA ID
10281211
Incident
Aug 16, 2009
Brakes
Filed May 15, 2008
Crash reported
WHILE SLOWING FOR A RED LIGHT, PRESSED BRAKE PEDAL AND VEHICLE IMMEDIATELY ACCELERATED BECOMING UNCONTROLLABLE. COLLIDED WITH A PICK UP AHEAD ,WHICH WAS PUSHED INTO A SMALL COMPACT AHEAD OF IT. AIRBAGS DID NOT DEPLOY. HAD EXPERIENCED SLIGHT ACCELERATION ON A PREVIOUS OCCASION, WHICH WAS DISCUSSED WITH MY MECHANIC. ( HAD ALSO HAD THIS PROBLEM ON MY 1999 RANGER WHICH WAS RESOLVED BY REPLACING IAC MOTOR.) VEHICLE CURRENTLY IN DEALERS SHOP, WHERE SERVICE PERSONNEL ARE UNABLE TO REPLICATE OCCURRENCE NOR FIND SOURCE OF PROBLEM. FORD MOTOR COMPANY DISCLAIMS ANY KNOWLEDGE OF PROBLEM ALTHOUGH MANY SEVERAL SIMILAR EVENTS INVOLVING THIS MODEL YEAR ARE WELL DOCUMENTED. VEHICLE IS WELL WITHIN WARRANTY PARAMETERS BUT LITTLE, IF ANY, ACTION IS ONGOING. I AM RELUCTANT TO RESUME OPERATION OF THIS VEHICLE WHILE CONDITION PERSISTS. *TR
NHTSA ID
10227879
Incident
May 1, 2008
Mileage
300,200 mi
Brakes
Filed Mar 14, 2008
EMAIL FROM CONGRESSMAN ON BEHALF OF CONSTITUENT, REGARDING PROBLEMS CONCERNING ABS BRAKE SYSTEM ON MERCURY AND LINCOLN VEHICLES. *KB THE CONSUMER STATED HE EXPERIENCED 3 BRAKE FAILURES ON 2 LINCOLN/MERCURY VEHICLES. THE FIRST VEHICLE WAS HIS OWN PERSONAL 2005 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS AND THE SECOND VEHICLE WAS A RENTED 2006 LINCOLN TOWN CAR. THE CONSUMER STATED HE DROVE HIS PERSONAL VEHICLE 3-4 DAYS WITH NO PROBLEM. THEN ONE TIME WHEN BRAKING FOR A RED LIGHT, THE VEHICLE SLOWED MOST OF THE WAY DOWN TO STOP, THEN THE CONSUMER LOST TOTAL CONTROL OF STOPPING THE VEHICLE, AND ENDED UP STOPPING 10-20 FEET AFTER WHAT HE INTENDED. THE CONSUMER WAS SITTING IN THE INTERSECTION. THE CONSUMER RETURNED THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALERSHIP WHERE THEY CANCELLED THE SALE. THE CONSUMER STATED WHEN HE APPLIED THE BRAKES ON THE RENTAL CAR, THE VEHICLE DIDN'T STOP IN A CONTROLLED MANNER. THE SECOND TIME THE INCIDENT HAPPENED, THE CONSUMER HAD TO USE THE PARKING BRAKE TO STOP THE VEHICLE. *JB THE CONSUMER WANTED TO OFFER HIS OPINION ON THE TOYOTA ACCELERATION PROBLEM. UPDATED CONGRESSIONAL LETTER. 09/07/10
NHTSA ID
10221678
Incident
Mar 3, 2008
Brakes
Filed Apr 6, 2007
Crash reported2 injuries reported
2005 GRAND MARQUIS PARKING BRAKE FAILED DROPPING CAR INTO REVERSE. RUNIING OVER DRIVER AND CRASHING INTO PARKED VEHICLE. *AK
NHTSA ID
10187199
Incident
Apr 3, 2007
Mileage
21,200 mi
Brakes
Filed Mar 1, 2007
2005 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS BRAKE FAILURE. **CC THE CONSUMER STATED WHEN HE ATTEMPTED TO APPLY THE BRAKES, THE VEHICLE SLOWED MOST OF THE WAY DOWN TO THE STOP, THEN THE CONSUMER LOST CONTROL OF THE VEHICLE AND ENDED UP STOPPING 10 TO 20 FEET OF WHERE HE INTENDED TO STOP. THE CONSUMER BELIEVED THERE WAS A SERIOUS BRAKE ISSUE WITH THE VEHICLE. THE CONSUMER RETURNED THE VEHICLE TO THE DEALER AND THE CONTRACT WAS CANCELLED. THE CONSUMER STATED A RENTED A 2006 LINCOLN TOWN CAR AND IT EXHIBITED THE SAME BRAKE FAILURE TWICE IN A SHORT TIME. THE BRAKES DID NOT STOP THE VEHICLE IN A CONTROLLED MANNER. *JB SEE ALSO 10184790. *DSY
NHTSA ID
10177497
Incident
Dec 1, 2006
Brakes
Filed Dec 8, 2006
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE APPLYING BRAKE PRESSURE AT LOW SPEEDS, A SQUEAKING NOISE WAS PRESENT. THE VEHICLE WAS INSPECTED BY A DEALER WHO DETERMINED THE SQUEAKING NOISE WAS NORMAL, AND THAT WAS THE WAY THE BRAKES WERE DESIGNED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT ALERTED. UPDATED 01/10/07. *JB
NHTSA ID
10175582
Incident
Dec 8, 2006
Mileage
15,000 mi
BrakesDriver assistance
Filed Aug 28, 2006
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE BACKING OUT OF A PARKING SPACE AT 5 MPH, THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED AND THE VEHICLE SURGED IN REVERSE. THE CONTACT SHIFTED INTO NEUTRAL, THE ENGINE REVVED, AND THE TACHOMETER ROSE QUICKLY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A SERVICE DEALER, WHERE THE DEALER WAS UNABLE TO DUPLICATE OR DETERMINE THE PROBLEM. THE DEALER TOLD THE CONSUMER, THE INCIDENT WAS DUE TO DRIVER ERROR AND WHEN SHE APPLIED THE BRAKE SHE INADVERTENTLY PRESSED THE ACCELERATOR AS WELL. UPDATED 09/11/06. *JB
NHTSA ID
10166704
Incident
Aug 26, 2006
Mileage
5,500 mi
Brakes
Filed Apr 6, 2006
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THE VEHICLE HAS BEEN TO THE DEALERSHIP NUMEROUS TIMES BECAUSE THE BRAKES ARE DEFECTIVE. WHEN PRESSURE IS APPLIED TO THE BRAKE PEDAL, THE PEDAL INTERMITTENTLY GOES TO THE FLOOR. MOST OFTEN THIS OCCURS WHILE STARTING THE VEHICLE AND PLACING IT IN GEAR. ON ONE OCCASION A POWER BOOSTER WAS REPLACED ON THE BRAKE SYSTEM. THIS DID NOT CORRECT THE PROBLEM. ON ANOTHER OCCASION, THERE WAS A PEDAL PRESSURE TEST PERFORMED. THE DEALERSHIP DETERMINED THE PRESSURE WAS A LITTLE LOW, BUT NOT ENOUGH FOR CONCERN.
NHTSA ID
10154740
Incident
Apr 6, 2006
Mileage
11,000 mi
BrakesDriver assistance
Filed Jul 22, 2005
DT: WHEN APPLYING BRAKE PEDAL PRESSURE THE PEDAL GOES PAST THE ACCELERATOR TO THE FLOOR, MOST OFTEN THIS OCCURS WHEN STARTING THE VEHICLE AND PLACING IT IN GEAR. WHEN THIS OCCURS IT IS EASY TO HIT THE GAS PEDAL AS WELL WHEN TRYING TO APPLY BRAKE PRESSURE. THIS CAUSES THE TIRES TO SQUEAL AND THE CAR TO LUNGE FORWARD. HAS BEEN TO A DEALER WHO SAID HE WOULD HAVE A SERVICE MANAGER CALL THE CONSUMER ABOUT THIS PROBLEM, BUT HE NEVER RETURNED THE CALL. THE SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE NOTED THERE WAS NOTHING WRONG. NO REPAIRS OR CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE. *AK
NHTSA ID
10129725
Incident
Feb 12, 2005
Mileage
200 mi
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.
Other components reported on this vehicle
Categories with enough reports to have a page of their own