RoadVitals

2005 Mitsubishi Fuso FE85D Owner Complaints

Reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers, shown in full

Data refreshed

Complaints on fileComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
2
Latest May 2, 2012
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0
Filed in the last 12 monthsReports filed with NHTSA in the trailing 365 days. Recent volume reflects attention and vehicle age as much as anything else.
0
Reports on file since Feb 24, 2012

What this page shows

Our database holds 2 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2005 Mitsubishi Fuso FE85D. Each one is a report filed by an owner or driver and published by NHTSA without most of them being verified. A complaint is not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. Narratives are shown exactly as filed.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Complaints, most recent first

Showing 1–2 of 2

Body & structure
Filed May 2, 2012

PREVIOUSLY REPORTED SEVERE ROT AND RUST OF CHASSIS/FRAME. THIS 6 YR TRUCK IS ALREADY SHOWING ACCELERATED SIGNS OF SAME RUST ACTIVITY. LARGE BLISTERS 6-8" DIA PUSHING OUT FROM BENEATH PAINT AND UNDERCOATING. SUSPECT THAT THIS TRUCK WILL CONTINUE TO ROT AND BE UNUSABLE IN 3-5 YEARS. *JS

NHTSA ID
10457175
Incident
Mar 1, 2012
Mileage
87,171 mi
ElectricalEngine
Filed Feb 24, 2012

2005 MITSUBISHI FE180 WENT IN SERVICE SEPTEMBER 20, 2006 AND WE ALSO PURCHASED THE EXTENDED POWERTRAIN COVERAGE, PTO300. ON NOVEMBER 30, 2006 THE TRUCK WAS EXPERIENCING A SKIP IN THE MOTOR, ALSO THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT HAD COME ON AND THE TRUCK HAD LOST POWER. ACCORDING TO THE DEALER THE PROBLEM WAS A LOOSE CONNECTION AT THE ECM FOR INJECTOR #4. THIS WAS TIGHTENED AND THE TRUCK WAS RETURNED TO US. THIS SAME THING HAPPENED A WEEK LATER, AGAIN IT WAS TIGHTENED AND RETURNED TO US. SOMEWHERE AROUND THE END OF JUNE 2010 THIS TRUCK AGAIN STARTED SKIPPING, THE CHECK ENGINE LIGHT CAME ON AND IT LOST POWER. DEALER CAME TO OUR SHOP TO PUT THE TRUCK ON THE COMPUTER AT A COST OF $95.00. DEALER SAID THAT TWO INJECTORS WERE NOT WORKING, ONE WAS WEAK AND ONE WAS OPERATING IN NORMAL PARAMETERS. AT DEALERS RECOMMENDATION I HAD THEM REPLACE ALL FOUR INJECTORS, AT A COST OF $3269.97. THE FIRST DAY WE DROVE THE TRUCK IT WAS EXPERIENCING THE SAME PROBLEM. THE DEALER CAME OUT TO THE TRUCK'S LOCATION AND TIGHTENED THE HARNESS/ECU CONNECTION. THIS TIME THE HARNESS AT THE ECU FOR THE INJECTORS WAS BURNT. AFTER CONTACTING THE MITSUBISHI DISTRICT REPRESENTATIVE, I WAS TOLD THAT THE INJECTOR WIRE ARCHED AND AT THIS TIME MITSUBISHI FUSO AGREED TO REPLACE THE WIRING HARNESS AND WE PAID THE LABOR AT A COST OF $625.00. SINCE THEN THIS PROBLEM WITH THE TRUCK SKIPPING, CHECK ENGINE LIGHT COMING ON AND LOSS OF POWER HAS OCCURRED TWO MORE TIMES. WE HAVE ISOLATED THE HARNESS CONNECTION AT THE ECU FOR THE INJECTORS HAD LOOSENED. THIS IS CAUSING MAJOR DOWN INJECTORS HAD LOOSENED. IT IS MY OPINION THAT ALL OF THESE PROBLEMS AND EXPENSES COME DOWN TO THE ECU CONNECTION. I PURCHASED INJECTORS THAT I DID NOT NEED. THE ECU SHOULD HAVE BEEN REPLACED IN JUNE 2010. THE ORIGINAL DIAGNOSIS AND PROBLEM IN NOVEMBER 2006 TURNED OUT WAS STILL THE PROBLEM IN 2010 AND TODAY. *TR

NHTSA ID
10449218
Incident
Nov 26, 2007
Mileage
3,586 mi

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .