RoadVitals

1995 Newmar Mountain Aire Problems

Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component

Data refreshed

Owner complaintsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
3
Latest Jan 15, 2008
Components namedHow many of our component categories appear on at least one report for this model year. One report can name several.
4
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0

What this page shows

Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 1995 Newmar Mountain Aire, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Reports by component

Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category

  • Body & structure125.0%
  • Driver assistance125.0%
  • Fuel system125.0%
  • Visibility125.0%

Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.

Each component in detail

What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words

Body & structure

Reports naming the vehicle structure, frame, body panels, doors, hood and trim.

1
report

From owner reports, verbatim

WHILE DRIVING ALONG HIGHWAY 28, APPROXIMATELY 75 MILES SOUTH OF SALMON IDAHO, THE ENTIRE FRONT WINDSHIELD BROKE LOOSE AND ENTERED INTO THE CAB. IT WAS STOPPED BY THE TV AND STORAGE UNITS. BOTH WINDSHIELDS, DRIVER, AND PASSENGER WERE DESTROYED, AND THE CENTER SUPPORT BRACKET BUCKLED. WAS ABLE TO INSTITUTE SOME TEMPORARY REPAIRS AND BROUGHT THE VEHICLE HOME. ONCE HOME, I FIRST CONTACTED THE FACTORY, WHO ASKED ME TO TAKE IT TO THEIR DEALER AND HAVE THE OPENING OF THE WINDSHIELD MEASURED, AND TO HAVE THE DEALER FAX IT TO THEM. THEN CONTACTED THE DEALER FOR MY BRAND OF COACH,BRETZ RV IN MISSOULA, MONTANA, WHO TOLD ME THAT THEY WERE FAMILIAR WITH THE PROBLEM, AND THEY STATED THAT THE SOONEST THEY COULD LOOK AT THE UNIT WAS JULY 9, WHICH I AGREED. THEY TOLD ME THAT THEY HAD SEEN OTHER UNITS LIKE THIS, AND HAD, AT THAT MOMENT A BRAND NEW UNIT, WITH THE SAME PROBLEM. THEY TOLD ME THAT THE FRONT OF THE UNIT NEEDED TO BE REFIRBISHEDR GLASSED, AND A NEW, STRONGER CUT OUT WOULD BE UTILIZED. THEY TOLD ME THAT THE ONLY PLACE TO GET THIS DONE WAS AT THE FACTORY, AND THAT THE FACTORY WOULD PAY TO PICK UP THE UNIT AND AND RETURN IT. LATER IN THE DAY, I RECEIVED A CALL FROM BOTH THE DEALER, AND SEPERATELY FROM THE FACTORY, WHO TOLD ME THAT NOT ONLY WOULD THEY NOT FIX THE PROBLEM, BUT THAT THEY HAD NO INTEREST IN EVEN LOOKING AT THE PROBLEM. THE REASON THEY GAVE WAS THAT THE UNIT WAS OUT OF WARRANTY, AND TOO OLD. THE UNIT IS A 1995 NEWMAR MOUNTAIN AIRE WITH 34,000 MILES. IT WAS MADE BY THE NEWMAR CORP. UPON HAVING THE WINDSHIELDS REPLACED, THE GLASS COMPANY TOLD ME THAT THEY SEE THIS POTENTIALLY FATAL PROBLEM OCCURRING QUITE REGULARLY. I BELIEVE THAT THIS STYLE OF DESIGN, WITH THE CERTAIN STRUCTURAL SUPPORT FEATURES LACKING, IS NOT ONLY A DESIGN DEFECT, BUT IS VERY DANGEROUS. I THINK IN A SITUATION LIKE THIS, THAT STEPS SHOULD BE TAKEN TO LLEVIATE THIS PROBLEM. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE.*AK

NHTSA ID 10079222 · filed Jul 3, 2004

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Driver assistance

Reports naming forward-collision avoidance, lane keeping, back-over prevention, cruise control and related electronic driver-assistance systems.

1
report

From owner reports, verbatim

I HAVE A MOTORHOME (FORD) WITH A RECALL, 05S28. I RECEIVED THE RECALL LETTER FROM FORD IN SEPT. OF 07. I HAVE BEEN TRYING TO GET THIS RECALL DONE SINCE THEN BUT ALL THE DEALERS ARE WAITING FOR FORD MOTOR CO. TO DELIVER THE REPLACEMENT PART. DON'T YOU THINK THIS PART WOULD BE AVAILABLE BY NOW. CAN YOU PUT SOME PRESSURE ON FORD MOTOR CO. TO DELIVER THESE PARTS. *TR

NHTSA ID 10214907 · filed Jan 15, 2008

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Fuel system

Reports naming fuel storage or delivery — tanks, pumps, lines, injectors and fuel leaks.

1
report

From owner reports, verbatim

PRIOR TO MANUFACTURER ANNOUNCEMENT OF REIMBURSEMENT OF DEFECIVE FUEL PUMPS CONSUMER REPLACED FUEL PUMP AND IS REQUESTING REIMBURSEMENT, BUT WAS ADVISED INCIDENT HAD TO BE REPORTED WITHIN 180 DAYS OF OCCURENCE AND CONSUMER NOTIFIED MANUFACTURER AFTER THE 180 DAYS CONSUMER WAS NOT AWARE THAT MANUFACTURER WAS REIMBURSING FOR REPAIRS PAST THE ORIGINAL 3 YEARS/36000 MILES PERIOD. *JB

NHTSA ID 560950 · filed Apr 30, 2001

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Visibility

Reports naming windshields, glass, wipers, defrosters and mirrors.

1
report

From owner reports, verbatim

WHILE DRIVING ALONG HIGHWAY 28, APPROXIMATELY 75 MILES SOUTH OF SALMON IDAHO, THE ENTIRE FRONT WINDSHIELD BROKE LOOSE AND ENTERED INTO THE CAB. IT WAS STOPPED BY THE TV AND STORAGE UNITS. BOTH WINDSHIELDS, DRIVER, AND PASSENGER WERE DESTROYED, AND THE CENTER SUPPORT BRACKET BUCKLED. WAS ABLE TO INSTITUTE SOME TEMPORARY REPAIRS AND BROUGHT THE VEHICLE HOME. ONCE HOME, I FIRST CONTACTED THE FACTORY, WHO ASKED ME TO TAKE IT TO THEIR DEALER AND HAVE THE OPENING OF THE WINDSHIELD MEASURED, AND TO HAVE THE DEALER FAX IT TO THEM. THEN CONTACTED THE DEALER FOR MY BRAND OF COACH,BRETZ RV IN MISSOULA, MONTANA, WHO TOLD ME THAT THEY WERE FAMILIAR WITH THE PROBLEM, AND THEY STATED THAT THE SOONEST THEY COULD LOOK AT THE UNIT WAS JULY 9, WHICH I AGREED. THEY TOLD ME THAT THEY HAD SEEN OTHER UNITS LIKE THIS, AND HAD, AT THAT MOMENT A BRAND NEW UNIT, WITH THE SAME PROBLEM. THEY TOLD ME THAT THE FRONT OF THE UNIT NEEDED TO BE REFIRBISHEDR GLASSED, AND A NEW, STRONGER CUT OUT WOULD BE UTILIZED. THEY TOLD ME THAT THE ONLY PLACE TO GET THIS DONE WAS AT THE FACTORY, AND THAT THE FACTORY WOULD PAY TO PICK UP THE UNIT AND AND RETURN IT. LATER IN THE DAY, I RECEIVED A CALL FROM BOTH THE DEALER, AND SEPERATELY FROM THE FACTORY, WHO TOLD ME THAT NOT ONLY WOULD THEY NOT FIX THE PROBLEM, BUT THAT THEY HAD NO INTEREST IN EVEN LOOKING AT THE PROBLEM. THE REASON THEY GAVE WAS THAT THE UNIT WAS OUT OF WARRANTY, AND TOO OLD. THE UNIT IS A 1995 NEWMAR MOUNTAIN AIRE WITH 34,000 MILES. IT WAS MADE BY THE NEWMAR CORP. UPON HAVING THE WINDSHIELDS REPLACED, THE GLASS COMPANY TOLD ME THAT THEY SEE THIS POTENTIALLY FATAL PROBLEM OCCURRING QUITE REGULARLY. I BELIEVE THAT THIS STYLE OF DESIGN, WITH THE CERTAIN STRUCTURAL SUPPORT FEATURES LACKING, IS NOT ONLY A DESIGN DEFECT, BUT IS VERY DANGEROUS. I THINK IN A SITUATION LIKE THIS, THAT STEPS SHOULD BE TAKEN TO LLEVIATE THIS PROBLEM. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ASSISTANCE.*AK

NHTSA ID 10079222 · filed Jul 3, 2004

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Elsewhere on this vehicle

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .