RoadVitals

2001 Victory V92SC Sportcruiser Owner Complaints

Reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers, shown in full

Data refreshed

Complaints on fileComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
2
Latest Jan 25, 2007
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0
Filed in the last 12 monthsReports filed with NHTSA in the trailing 365 days. Recent volume reflects attention and vehicle age as much as anything else.
0
Reports on file since Apr 13, 2005

What this page shows

Our database holds 2 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2001 Victory V92SC Sportcruiser. Each one is a report filed by an owner or driver and published by NHTSA without most of them being verified. A complaint is not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. Narratives are shown exactly as filed.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Complaints, most recent first

Showing 1–2 of 2

Transmission
Filed Jan 25, 2007

TL* - THE CONTACT STATED THAT HE RECEIVED RECALL NOTICE# 06V298000 FOR THE 2001 VICTORY V92SC SPORT CRUISER MOTORCYCLE, POWER TRAIN: MANUAL TRANSMISSION. THE MANUFACTURER STATED THAT THE OWNERS MUST LEAVE THEIR MOTORCYCLES WITH THE DEALER DUE TO THE SAFETY ISSUE FOR 7 MONTHS. THE MANUFACTURER POLARIS STATED THAT THE RECALL DIDN'T BEGIN UNTIL 06/2007. THE MOTORCYCLE HAS BEEN AT POLARIS OF CUMMING IN GEORGIA SINCE 11/06. THE DEALER INFORMED HIM THAT THE MANUFACTURER ORDERED THEM TO KEEP THE MOTORCYCLE UNTIL THEY WERE REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER ISSUED 18 KITS FOR THE MOTORCYCLES DURING THE WEEK OF 12/18/06. THE CONTACT WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE LENGTH OF TIME IT WAS TAKING TO REPAIR THE VEHICLE, AND WAS UNSURE ABOUT THE LEGAL ISSUES SURROUNDING THE CONFISCATION OF THE MOTORCYCLE WITHOUT THE OWNER'S CONSENT. *AK

NHTSA ID
10180696
Incident
Nov 22, 2006
Mileage
8,000 mi
Other / unspecified
Filed Apr 13, 2005

AFTER 17,500 MILES,I HEARD SCRAPING NOISES FROM THE REAR WHEEL THAT WOULD EVENTUALLY DISAPPEAR WHEN RIDING THE BIKE FROM A COLD START. NOTICED SLIGHT WIGGLE WHEN LEANING INTO TURNS AT 60 MPH. I PLACED THE BIKE ON A LIFT AND WAS ABLE TO MOVE THE REAR TIRE SIDE TO SIDE WITH MY HANDS. I EVENTUALLY TOOK THE BIKE TO MY DEALER TO HAVE THE REAR RIM CHECKED OUT. I WAS TOLD THAT NOT ONLY DID THE REAR BEARING FAIL ON DRIVE SIDE, BUT IT GALLED OUT THE ALUMINUM FACE INSIDE THE RIM RENDERING IT USELESS. AS A RESULT, NO BEARINGS COULD BE INSTALLED UNLESS A NEW RIM WAS PURCHASED. A NEW RIM WAS PURCHASED ON 11/14/04. THE ORIGINAL RIM WAS DISPOSED OF BY THE DEALER AT MY REQUEST. *AK

NHTSA ID
10116901
Incident
Oct 25, 2004
Mileage
17,500 mi

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .