RoadVitals

1996 Chevrolet Crew Cab Problems

Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component

Data refreshed

Owner complaintsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
1
Latest Jun 27, 2005
Components namedHow many of our component categories appear on at least one report for this model year. One report can name several.
2
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0

What this page shows

Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 1996 Chevrolet Crew Cab, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Reports by component

Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category

  • Body & structure150.0%
  • Suspension150.0%

Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.

Each component in detail

What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words

Body & structure

Reports naming the vehicle structure, frame, body panels, doors, hood and trim.

1
report

From owner reports, verbatim

THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE ARM THAT HOLDS THE WHEEL ON THE VEHICLE BROKE OFF, IT RIPPED PART OF THE FRAME. THE SERVICE DEALER STATED IT WAS A DEFECT WITHIN THE VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER SAID THEY WOULD PROVIDE $500 TOWARD THE PURCHASE OF A NEW VEHICLE OR THEY WOULD PROVIDE THE WELDING OF THE WHEEL ARM WITHOUT WARRANTY. *AK THE UPPER CONTROL ARM BRACKETS WERE NOT WELDED WHEN MANUFACTURED. THE BRACKET AND THE TIRE PUSHED UP AGAINST THE ENGINE AND SHORTED THE WIRING HARNESS, BLEW FUSES AND THE PICKED UP WOULDN'T START. *SC *JB

NHTSA ID 10122224 · filed Jun 27, 2005

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Suspension

Reports naming suspension components — springs, struts, shocks, control arms and related hardware.

1
report

From owner reports, verbatim

THE CONSUMER STATED THAT THE ARM THAT HOLDS THE WHEEL ON THE VEHICLE BROKE OFF, IT RIPPED PART OF THE FRAME. THE SERVICE DEALER STATED IT WAS A DEFECT WITHIN THE VEHICLE. THE MANUFACTURER SAID THEY WOULD PROVIDE $500 TOWARD THE PURCHASE OF A NEW VEHICLE OR THEY WOULD PROVIDE THE WELDING OF THE WHEEL ARM WITHOUT WARRANTY. *AK THE UPPER CONTROL ARM BRACKETS WERE NOT WELDED WHEN MANUFACTURED. THE BRACKET AND THE TIRE PUSHED UP AGAINST THE ENGINE AND SHORTED THE WIRING HARNESS, BLEW FUSES AND THE PICKED UP WOULDN'T START. *SC *JB

NHTSA ID 10122224 · filed Jun 27, 2005

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Elsewhere on this vehicle

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .