2008 Chevrolet Express 2500 Problems
Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component
Data refreshed
What this page shows
Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 2008 Chevrolet Express 2500, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Reports by component
Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category
- Body & structure233.3%
- Brakes233.3%
- Electrical116.7%
- Seat belts116.7%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Each component in detail
What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words
Body & structure
Reports naming the vehicle structure, frame, body panels, doors, hood and trim.
From owner reports, verbatim
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 CHEVROLET EXPRESS 2500 CARGO VAN. THE CONTACT THAT THE PASSENGER SIDE CARGO DOOR HINGE FAILED AND AS RESULT, THE DOORS WERE NOT ABLE TO CLOSE PROPERLY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHO VERIFIED THE FAILURE AND STATED THAT THE HINGE NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 65,000.
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 CHEVROLET EXPRESS 2500. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE DRIVER SIDE DOOR MOUNTAIN BRACKET THAT WAS ATTACHED TO THE ARM REST OF THE DOOR PANEL FRACTURED FROM THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE THE TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THE ENTIRE DOOR PANEL WOULD NEED TO BE REPLACED BECAUSE THE PART WAS NOT AVAILABLE SEPARATELY. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CONTACTED AND WAS UNABLE TO ASSIST. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE REPAIRS WERE COVERED UNDER WARRANTY BUT HE WAS CONCERNED THAT THE FAILURE WOULD RECUR IN THE FUTURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 19,300.
Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.
Brakes
Reports naming service brakes, the antilock braking system, brake hoses, master cylinders or the parking brake.
From owner reports, verbatim
I AM 62 YEARS OLD AND SELF EMPLOYED. I DO APPLIANCE SERVICE AND DRIVE OVER 25,000 MILES EVERY YEAR. I HAVE OWNED MANY DIFFERENT VEHICLES OVER THE YEARS. A YEAR AGO I PURCHASED A NEW 2008 CHEVROLET G2500 3/4 TON SERVICE VAN. I HAVE NEVER OWNED ANY OTHER VEHICLE WHERE I WAS MORE PRONE TO HITTING THE GAS PEDAL WHILE ATTEMPTING TO APPLY THE BRAKES. ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS I HAVE FOUND MYSELF APPLYING BOTH THE BRAKES AND GAS AT THE SAME TIME. I FEEL THE PROBLEMS IS THE CLOSE PROXIMITY OF THE TWO PEDALS AND THAT THEY ARE VERY CLOSE TO THE SAME HEIGHT. I HAVE BECOME VERY AWARE OF THIS PROBLEM, BUT FIND THAT UNLESS I AM EXTREMELY ALERT, IT STILL HAPPENS. I FEAR THAT AT SOME POINT, I WILL FIND MYSELF IN SOME KIND OF ACCIDENT BECAUSE OF THIS AND REALLY AM FEARFUL OF WHAT MAY HAPPEN IF I NEED TO APPLY THE BRAKES IN AN EMERGENCY SITUATION. *TR
TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2008 CHEVROLET EXPRESS 2500. THE VEHICLE WAS SERVICED SEVERAL TIMES DUE TO BRAKE FAILURE. WHEN APPROACHING A STOP LIGHT, THE BRAKES MADE A DRAGGING SOUND THAT COULD NOT BE CORRECTED. THE CONTACT ALSO HEARD A KNOCKING SOUND COMING FROM THE VEHICLE WHEN THE BRAKE PEDAL WAS DEPRESSED. THE DEALER COULD NOT DUPLICATE THE FAILURE; HOWEVER, THEY CLEANED AND LUBED THE BRAKES. THIS DID NOT CORRECT THE FAILURE. THE DEALER THEN REPLACED THE BRAKE PADS, DISCS, AND ROTORS. AFTER TWO WEEKS, THE BRAKES FAILED AGAIN AND THE NOISE WAS STILL PRESENT. THE VEHICLE CONTINUES TO LOSE BRAKING CONTROL AND THE DEALER CANNOT DETERMINE A SOLUTION TO REMEDY THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS LESS THAN 1,000 AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 7,600. UPDATED 03-04-09 *BF UPDATED 03/04/09. *JB
Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.
Electrical
Reports naming the electrical system — wiring, battery, charging, control modules, infotainment and electrical accessories.
From owner reports, verbatim
I AM RESPONSIBLE FOR PURCHASING VEHICLES FOR OUR COMPANY AND WE CURRENTLY HAVE A 2005 AND 2008 CHEVROLET EXPRESS AND WE JUST SOLD A 2004 AND ALL HAVE THE SAME PROBLEM- THE INSTRUMENT CLUSTER PANEL STOPS WORKING AND WE HAVE NO SPEEDOMETER. I HAVE A 2004 BLAZER WITH THE SAME PROBLEM. THE REPAIR IS $700 AND GM REFUSES TO RECALL THE VEHICLES FOR A PROBLEM THAT HAS BEEN GOING ON SINCE 2002 AND OF COURSE DRIVING WITHOUT A SPEEDOMETER CREATES A SAFETY ISSUE. *TR
Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.
Seat belts
Reports naming seat belts, buckles, retractors and pretensioners.
From owner reports, verbatim
WE PURCHASED 6 OF THESE SEATS, OF WHICH WE INTENDED ON USING 4 OF THEM IN THE REAR FACING POSITION. ATTEMPTED TO ATTACH WITH THE LATCH SYSTEM. AFTER A GREAT DEAL OF TIME SPENT GOING THROUGH THE OWNERS MANUAL I HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO INSTALL THE SEATS IN THE REAR POSITION. THE FIRST AND MAJOR CONCERN IS THAT THE LATCH POSITION BELT IS TOO SHORT AND WHEN IT IS INSTALLED ACCORDING TO THE MANUFACTURES DIRECTIONS IN WILL SQUEEZE THE CHILD IN BETWEEN THE POSITION BELT AND THE HARNESS. IN MY MIND, THIS IS A SERIOUS SAFETY HAZARD. I CONTACTED THE MANUFACTURE AND THEIR SOLUTION IS TO CUT THE POSITION BELT. THE OTHER CONCERN IS THAT THE LATCH BELTS ARE TOO SHORT ALSO. I TRIED TO INSTALL INTO 2 2008 GM VEHICLES AND DUE TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SAFETY SEAT IT REQUIRES A GREAT DEAL OF MATERIAL TO LEVEL IT UP. WHEN IT IS LEVELED UP THE LATCH BELTS ARE NOT LONG ENOUGH TO ATTACH TO THE LATCH SYSTEM. THE MANUFACTURE HAS NOT BEEN ANY HELP. (RELATED VEHICLE INFORMATION: MODEL YEAR=2008, MAKE=CHEVORLET, MODEL=K2500 HD CREW CAB). *TR
Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.
Elsewhere on this vehicle
Data sources
- NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation — owner-reported complaints and the components recorded on them
Data on this page last refreshed .