RoadVitals

1998 Chevrolet P Series Owner Complaints

Reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers, shown in full

Data refreshed

Complaints on fileComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
2
Latest May 26, 2005
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0
Filed in the last 12 monthsReports filed with NHTSA in the trailing 365 days. Recent volume reflects attention and vehicle age as much as anything else.
0
Reports on file since Jul 11, 2000

What this page shows

Our database holds 2 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 1998 Chevrolet P Series. Each one is a report filed by an owner or driver and published by NHTSA without most of them being verified. A complaint is not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. Narratives are shown exactly as filed.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Complaints, most recent first

Showing 1–2 of 2

Brakes
Filed May 26, 2005

WHILE DRIVING ON THE FREEWAY, MY AUTO PARK BRAKE FAILED AND BURNED UP BUT THERE WAS NO FIRE. IT HAPPENED TWICE WITHIN 2000 MILES OF EACH OTHER. I WAS LEFT WITH NO PARKING BRAKE OR STOPPING ON A HILL AND EXITING THE VEHICLE WITHOUT THE VEHICLE ROLLING. THE FIRST REPAIR WAS DONE AT A CHEVROLET DEARLER THAT ONLY REPLACED A PREASURE SWITCH. THE SECOND REPAIR WAS AFTER THE FIRST TIME THE BRAKE BURNED UP. THE BRAKE AND VARIOUS OTHER PARKS WERE REPLACED. THE THIRD REPAIR WAS DONE BY THE SAME FACILITY THAT REPLACED THE BRAKE EARLIER AFTER THE SECOND PARK BRAKE BURNED UP. THE FOURTH REPAIR CAME AFTER I LEFT THE SHOP AND HAD DRIVEN 20 MILES AND THE PROBLEM REACCURED. THE FIFTH REPAIR OCCURED ONE DAY LATER AND THE PROBLEM RETURNED AND WAS CORRECTED BY A GM FACILITY IN BAKERSFIELD, CA. THIS COULD HAVE BEEN A SERIOUS PROBLEM IF I HAD NEEDED TO EXIT THE VEHICLE IN A HURRY ON ANY KIND OF INCLINE. I HAVE SPENT ALMOST $3,000 TO FIND SOMEONE THAT KNEW ANYTHING ABOUT THIS SITUATION. ONE TOW TRUCK DRIVER WHO TOWED ME SAID HE HAD OTHERS WITH SIMILAR PROBLEMS WITH THE AUTO PARK BRAKE. ALSO, THE GM DEALER THAT GOT THE JOB DONE RIGHT HAD SEEN SOMONE THE WEEK BEFORE BUT THAT HE ONLY DISCONECTED THE DRIVE LINE AND RECONNECTED IT TO GIVE A TEMPORARY FIX. HE DID NOT SEE THAT VEHICLE AGAIN.

NHTSA ID
10122257
Incident
Mar 6, 2005
Mileage
55,600 mi
BrakesTransmission
Filed Jul 11, 2000

TRANSMISSION DOES NOT HAVE A SECOND GEAR HOLDING POSITION . THIS IS CAUSING THE BRAKES TO FADE. MANUFACTURER HAS BEEN NOTIFIED.*AK

NHTSA ID
865205
Incident
May 26, 2000

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .