RoadVitals

1999 Chevrolet S10 Suspension Problems

Owner-reported complaints naming the suspension system, filed with NHTSA

Data refreshed

Suspension reportsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
9
Latest Dec 17, 2011
Share of all reportsThis category as a share of every owner report on file for this model year. One report can name more than one component, so the categories overlap.
4%
of 231 total
Crash or fire reportedReports in this category whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. The reporter's own answer on the NHTSA form, not a verified finding.
1
Injuries or deaths reportedTotals the submitters entered on their own reports in this category. Not verified by NHTSA and not a casualty statistic.
0

What this page shows

Reports naming suspension components — springs, struts, shocks, control arms and related hardware. Every record below is an owner-reported complaint about the 1999 Chevrolet S10 submitted to NHTSA — not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. 9 reports on file name it.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Owner reports naming suspension

Shown in the owner’s own words, exactly as filed

Suspension
Filed Dec 17, 2011

THE UPPER CONTROL ARM ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE FAILED DUE TO CORROSION. THE TRUCK WAS TOWED TO THE DEALER WHO ORIGINALLY SAID THAT THEY WOULD NOT WORK ON THE TRUCK DUE TO LIABILITY ISSUES IF SOMETHING ELSE FAILED. WHEN I WENT IN TO PAY THE TOWING CHARGE, A DIFFERENT SERVICE COUNTER REPRESENTATIVE SAID THAT THEY WOULD INDEED WORK ON THE TRUCK BUT ONLY IF I AGREED TO REPLACE THE UPPER AND LOWER CONTROL ARMS ON BOTH SIDES. TOTAL COST WAS ESTIMATED TO BE GREATER THAN $2500. I HAD THE TRUCK TOWED TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHO REPLACED THE DRIVER'S SIDE UPPER CONTROL ARM FOR $473.77. WHILE THE MECHANIC WAS BACKING THE TRUCK OUT OF THE GARAGE AFTER THE REPAIR, A SECTION OF BRAKE LINE FAILED DUE TO CORROSION (SEE SEPARATE COMPLAINT.) *TR

NHTSA ID
10440285
Incident
Nov 1, 2011
Mileage
84,562 mi
EngineSuspension
Filed Mar 12, 2007

TSB #030601024A -- RATTLE NOISE IN ENGINE. *TT (NHTSA ID #10004301, MARCH 01 2004) #6 ROD CAP STRETCHED, CAUSING BEARING TO FAIL. ALSO OTHER BEARINGS BEGAN TO FAIL. POSSIBLY DUE TO COOLANT LEAK FROM INTAKE MANIFOLD GASKET OR JUST VERY DEFECTIVE PART - MECHANIC UNSURE THIS OF A VEHICLE THAT IS PROPERLY (SOMETIMES OVERLY) MAINTAINED. HAVE ALL SERVICE RECORDS TO PROVE IT. EVEN MECHANICS COMMENTED ON UPKEEP OF VEHICLE. SERVICE FACILITY REFUSES TO MAKE REPAIRS - TRYING TO FORCE COMPLETE ENGINE REPLACEMENT EVEN THOUGH CRANK JOURNALS CAN BE POLISHED, NEW BEARINGS CAN BE PUT IN AND ROD CAN BE REPLACED. BASICALLY THEY AND GM ARE LOOKING FOR A BIG PAYDAY - THEY ARE SADLY MISTAKEN. I HAVE HAD NOTHING BUT PROBLEMS WITH THIS VEHICLE, WITH EACH REPAIR BECOMING MORE AND MORE EXPENSIVE. I NOW HAVE TO GET RID OF THE TRUCK AND HAVE FINANCIAL HARDSHIP DUE TO THE COSTLY REPAIRS. THE SAD PART ABOUT THIS IS GM DOES NOT STAND BEHIND THEIR PRODUCTS / SERVICES, A RECALL SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE FOR THIS PROBLEM AS IT IS VERY COMMON TO THEIR ENGINE FAMILIES, SIMILAR TO THE PISTON SLAP ISSUE WITH THE TRUCK LS-SERIES OF ENGINES. *JB

NHTSA ID
10184815
Incident
Mar 7, 2007
Mileage
73,960 mi
Suspension
Filed Mar 4, 2005

WHILE BACKING INTO THE DRIVEWAY SUDDENLY AND WITHOUT WARNING THE FRONT RIGHT SIDE OF THE VEHICLE DROPPED TO THE GROUND.TWO WEEK LATER, ON FEBRUARY 26, 2005, WHILE BACKING AROUND IN THE DRIVEWAY THE DRIVER'S SIDE FRONT DROPPED TO THE GROUND. ON BOTH SEPARATE TIMES THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO A REPAIR SHOP, AND MECHANIC CONFIRMED THAT BOTH LOWER BALL JOINTS BROKE, AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. MANUFACTURER WAS NOT NOTIFIED. HE, IN TURN, INFORMED THE CONSUMER THAT THIS VEHICLE WAS NOT COVERED UNDER A RECALL.*AK

NHTSA ID
10113437
Incident
Feb 12, 2005
Mileage
97,500 mi
Suspension
Filed Jul 6, 2004

CONSUMER WAS INFORMED BY DEALERSHIP ABOUT THE NUMBER OF REPAIRS NEEDED ON THE VEHICLE. *LA THE SERVICE DEALER LISTED UNNEEDED REPAIRS. THE CONSUMER HAD A 45 POINT INSPECTION WHERE THEY DETERMINED THAT THE ONLY WORK NEEDED WAS WITH LEAKING SHOCKS. (GREAT AMERICAN CHEVROLET WAS BEING DISHONEST) *SC *JB

NHTSA ID
10081866
Incident
May 18, 2004
Suspension
Filed Jan 3, 2003

BALL JOINT BROKE, LETTING WHEEL BEND UNDER PICKUP. *****DIMS 11 IVOQ ENTRY POSTED AFTER 12/12/02 CUT-OVER TO ARTEMIS*****770813. *AK *JB

NHTSA ID
10006577
Incident
Dec 29, 2002
Suspension
Filed Jun 8, 2001

THE CENTER LIFT WAS DEFECTIVE, THE SPRINGS FOR THE EXTENSION BAR THAT GOES ON THE BOTH SIDES IN THE FRONT ARE MISSING. NLM

NHTSA ID
561513
Incident
Jan 1, 1999
Suspension
Filed Oct 8, 2000
Crash reported

REPORTING V- BOLT BROKE FROM REAR END WHILE TRAVELING AT 35 MPH, CAUSING VEHICLE TO LOSE CONTROL, AND WENT INTO A DITCH. DEALER WAS NOTIFIED. PLEASE FEEL FREE TO PROVIDE ANY FURTHER DETAILS. *AK

NHTSA ID
872539
Incident
Nov 11, 1999
Suspension
Filed Jun 19, 2000

CONSUMER WAS TRAVELING ABOUT 40-30MPH AND VEHICLE STARTED VIBRATING. ALSO, LEFT FRONT TIRE CAME COMPLETELY OFF THE ROTOR. DEALER IS CURRENTLY LOOKING AT THE VEHICLE.*AK

NHTSA ID
863792
Incident
Jun 17, 2000
AirbagsBody & structureElectrical+3 more
Filed Feb 26, 2000

IGNITION BROKE CONSUMER HAD IT REPAIRED AND IT BROKE AGAIN ON THE SAME DAY.AGAIN SWITCH SEIZED HAD TO REPLACE CASE, RETAINES, CABLE ASEMBLY,SWITCH, AND CYLINER.*ET

NHTSA ID
784532

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Other components reported on this vehicle

Categories with enough reports to have a page of their own

Elsewhere on this vehicle

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .