2005 Hino 145 Problems
Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component
Data refreshed
What this page shows
Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 2005 Hino 145, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Reports by component
Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category
- Brakes150.0%
- Engine150.0%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Each component in detail
What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words
Brakes
Reports naming service brakes, the antilock braking system, brake hoses, master cylinders or the parking brake.
From owner reports, verbatim
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS 2005 TOYOTA 145. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE CHECK ENGINE WARNING LIGHT WAS ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE THE TECHNICIAN DIAGNOSED THAT THE FAILURE WAS DUE TO POOR LUBRICATION OF THE TURBO CHARGER. AS A RESULT, THE TURBO CHARGER NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE ISSUE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 13,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 14,089. UPDATED 05/28/14*LJ THE CONSUMER WAS ADVISED THAT THE DISC BRAKES ALSO NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. UPDATED 06/04/2014 *JS UPDATED 10/22/14*CN THE CONSUMER NO LONGER OWNS THE VEHICLE. UPDATED 7/22/2015 *JS
Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.
Engine
Reports naming the engine itself — including stalling, misfires, oil consumption, cooling and internal engine components.
From owner reports, verbatim
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS 2005 TOYOTA 145. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE CHECK ENGINE WARNING LIGHT WAS ILLUMINATED. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE THE TECHNICIAN DIAGNOSED THAT THE FAILURE WAS DUE TO POOR LUBRICATION OF THE TURBO CHARGER. AS A RESULT, THE TURBO CHARGER NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE ISSUE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 13,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 14,089. UPDATED 05/28/14*LJ THE CONSUMER WAS ADVISED THAT THE DISC BRAKES ALSO NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. UPDATED 06/04/2014 *JS UPDATED 10/22/14*CN THE CONSUMER NO LONGER OWNS THE VEHICLE. UPDATED 7/22/2015 *JS
Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.
Elsewhere on this vehicle
Data sources
- NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation — owner-reported complaints and the components recorded on them
Data on this page last refreshed .