2022 Isuzu N-Series Problems
Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component
Data refreshed
What this page shows
Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 2022 Isuzu N-Series, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Reports by component
Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category
- Engine1100.0%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Each component in detail
What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words
Engine
Reports naming the engine itself — including stalling, misfires, oil consumption, cooling and internal engine components.
From owner reports, verbatim
The contact owns a 2022 Isuzu NRR commercial vehicle. The contact stated while driving at an undisclosed speed, the check engine warning light illuminated. The vehicle was taken to the dealer where the ignition switch was replaced; however, the failure reoccurred. Additionally, the contact stated while driving 30 MPH, several unknown warning lights illuminated and the vehicle stalled. The driver was able to veer to the side of the road. The driver was able to restart the vehicle after several attempts. The check engine warning light was illuminated. The vehicle was taken back to the dealer and test-driven. The dealer informed the contact that upon test driving the vehicle, they could not duplicate the failure. The contact stated that the vehicle stalled for a second time while driving. The vehicle was taken back to the dealer who test drove the vehicle. The dealer informed the contact that upon test driving the vehicle, they could not duplicate the failure. However, the OBD reader indicated that the vehicle had lost connection with the Engine Control Unit (ECU). The regional manager was notified of the failure and informed the contact that the failure was not a known failure and that the loss of connection with the Engine Control Unit (ECU) could not be the cause of the failure. The regional manager also informed the contact had to pay out of pocket for a continuous investigation of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was approximately 9,744.
Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.
Elsewhere on this vehicle
Data sources
- NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation — owner-reported complaints and the components recorded on them
Data on this page last refreshed .