RoadVitals

2007 Keystone Everest Problems

Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component

Data refreshed

Owner complaintsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
8
Latest Aug 15, 2014
Components namedHow many of our component categories appear on at least one report for this model year. One report can name several.
4
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0

What this page shows

Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 2007 Keystone Everest, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Reports by component

Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category

  • Body & structure337.5%
  • Suspension225.0%
  • Tires & wheels225.0%
  • Other / unspecified112.5%

Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.

Each component in detail

What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words

Body & structure

Reports naming the vehicle structure, frame, body panels, doors, hood and trim.

3
reports

From owner reports, verbatim

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 KEYSTONE EVEREST RV. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 35 MPH, THE DRIVER SIDE FRONT TIRE SUDDENLY BLEW. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC. THE TECHNICIAN STATED THAT THE TIRE FAILURE OCCURRED AS A RESULT OF THE FRAME FRACTURING ABOVE THE ROCKER AREA OF THE FRONT AND REAR AXLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE BUT NOT SOLUTION WAS OFFERED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS UNKNOWN.

NHTSA ID 10622512 · filed Aug 15, 2014

TOWING EVEREST 5TH WHEEL MODEL 364Q FROM CALIF TO WASHINGTON. LIPPERT FRAME BROKE OVER AXLES ON BOTH SIDES AND BENT, BROKE OR TWISTED 14 FT. AXEL SHIFTED 4" TO PASSENGER SIDE CAUSING TIRE TO RUB AGAINST FRAME FOR BLOW OUT. LIPPERT FRAMES ARE UNSAFE AT ANY SPEED AND HAVE BEEN CAUSING DAMAGE TO MANY RV'S FOR SEVERAL YEARS. WHY HASN'T NHTSA FIXED THIS? PEOPLES LIVES ARE IN DANGER!!!!!! *TR

NHTSA ID 10274623 · filed Jun 22, 2009

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Suspension

Reports naming suspension components — springs, struts, shocks, control arms and related hardware.

2
reports

From owner reports, verbatim

LOOSE AXLE. THE BACK AXLE BECAME LOOSE THEREFORE CAUSING IT TO BACK P TO THE FRAME ON ONE SIDE AND RUBBING ON THE INSIDE FRAME AND WHEEL COVERS. THIS COULD HAVE CAUSED A TIRE BLOW ON BOTH SIDES TO EXTREMELY HIGH FRICTION OF THE TIRES ON THE ROAD AND RAPID WEAR OF THE TIRES. THIS ALSO COULD HAVE CAUSED A FIRE DUE TO HEAT CREATED BY THE FRICTION OF THE TIRE ON THE TIRE COVER AND FRAME. *TR

NHTSA ID 10235308 · filed Jul 22, 2008

THE TRAILER WAS BEING NORMALLY DRIVEN AT LEGAL HIGHWAY SPEEDS AND WAS PROPERLY LOADED. THE CURBSIDE REAR LEAF SPRING HANGER WELDS BROKE COMPLETELY LOOSE FROM THE SUBFRAME. THE HANGER BECAME WEDGED IN THE HOLE LEFT IN THE SUBFRAME. RESULTING IN SIGNIFICANT DAMAGE TO THE TRAILER SUSPENSION. AT THIS TIME, THE DAMAGE IS STILL BEING EVALUATED. ANY OLD PARTS WILL BE RETAINED FOR POSSIBLE LITIGATION PURPOSES. *TR

NHTSA ID 10215681 · filed Jan 22, 2008

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Tires & wheels

Reports naming tires, wheels, hubs, or the tire-pressure monitoring system.

2
reports

From owner reports, verbatim

I OWN A 2007 KEYSTONE EVEREST FIVER. THE TIRES ON IT ARE THE MISSION'S 235-80-16 LOAD RANGE. I'VE HAD TWO BLOWOUTS,THE FIRST WASN'T THAT BAD BUT THE SECOND ONE DID SOME DAMAGE ON THE SIDE OF THE CAMPER. I CONTACTED THE TIRE MANUFACTURER AND WAS TOLD THAT BECAUSE THE TIRES WERE FIVE YEARS OLD THAT THEY COULDN'T OR SHOULD I SAY WOULDN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. I EXPLAINED TO THEM THAT I PURCHASED THE UNIT NEW OFF THE LOT IN 2007. I WAS TOLD THAT THE DATE ON THE TIRES WAS 2006 AND THAT THE LIFE SPAN OF TRAILER TIRES WAS 3 TO 5 YEARS THAT IT DIDN'T MATTER IF THEY WERE IN SERVICE OR WAS WAITING TO BE PUT ON THE UNITS. SO PEOPLE EVERYONE NEEDS TO LOOK AT THE DATES ON THE TIRES WHEN THEY GO TO PURCHASE A NEW CAMPER BECAUSE IT MAY HAVE OLDER TIRES ON IT AND NOT KNOW ABOUT IT. I KNOW THAT I WILL BE LOOKING. IT'S NOT FUN SETTING ON THE SIDE OF ROAD TRYING TO CHANGE A FLAT WITH TRUCKERS COMING BY YOU AT 80 MPH AND THE CAMPER ON A JACK WITH NO TIRE ON THE CAMPER SHAKING SIDE TO SIDE WONDERING IF ITS GOING TO FALL OF THE JACK BEFORE YOU GET THE TIRE BACK ON. *KB

NHTSA ID 10413373 · filed Jul 18, 2011

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 KEYSTONE EVEREST RECREATIONAL VEHICLE. ONE OF THE TIRES ON THE RV WAS DAMAGED. WHEN HE NOTIFIED THE MANUFACTURER, THE CONTACT WAS TOLD THAT THEY WOULD ASSIST WITH REPLACING THE TIRE. HE CONTACTED THE MANUFACTURER A SECOND TIME AFTER SEVERAL DAYS AND WAS THEN TOLD THAT HE WOULD BE LIABLE FOR THE SHIPPING COSTS OF THE NEW TIRE. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES, AS WELL AS THE VIN, WERE UNAVAILABLE.

NHTSA ID 10319287 · filed Mar 12, 2010

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Other / unspecified

Reports whose component NHTSA recorded as unknown, or that do not map to one of the categories above.

1
report

From owner reports, verbatim

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2007 KEYSTONE EVEREST TRAILER. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE BOILER ON THE REFRIGERATOR WAS DAMAGED AND NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. DOMETIC ALSO PLACED A COVERING AROUND THE REFRIGERATOR, BUT THE CONTACT FEELS THAT THIS MAY NOT COMPLETELY ELIMINATE THE FAILURE. THE REFRIGERATOR COOLANT CONTINUED TO LEAK. THE CONTACT HAD TO REPLACE THE REFRIGERATOR SINCE THE REPAIR FAILED.

NHTSA ID 10361253 · filed Oct 19, 2010

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Elsewhere on this vehicle

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .