RoadVitals

2003 Land Rover Defender Owner Complaints

Reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers, shown in full

Data refreshed

Complaints on fileComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
1
Latest Nov 20, 2006
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0
Filed in the last 12 monthsReports filed with NHTSA in the trailing 365 days. Recent volume reflects attention and vehicle age as much as anything else.
0
Reports on file since Nov 20, 2006

What this page shows

Our database holds 1 NHTSA owner-reported complaint for the 2003 Land Rover Defender. Each one is a report filed by an owner or driver and published by NHTSA without most of them being verified. A complaint is not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. Narratives are shown exactly as filed.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Complaints, most recent first

Showing 1–1 of 1

BrakesEngineVisibility
Filed Nov 20, 2006

AT 30,000 MILES, WE TOOK THE VEHICLE IN TO BE "SERVICED" MAINLY BECAUSE ANOTHER MECHANIC TOLD US THAT THE OIL WAS 'GUNKED'. THE DEALER INFORMED US THAT THERE WAS NO PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE OR THE WARRANTY AND REPLACED THE OIL AT A CHARGE OF OVER $94.00. THEN AT 34,000, THE BRAKES SUDDENLY BEGAN TO GRIND AND THE BRAKE LIGHT CAME ON, WE TOOK IT TO THE DEALER AND THEY SAID IT WAS "NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR" AND CHARGED US OVER $355.00 TO FIX THE BRAKES. AFTER ANOTHER 1,000 MILES, THE LIGHT CAME ON AGAIN, WHEN WE CALLED THEM THEY TOLD US TO LEAVE IT WITH THEM FOR A FEW WEEKS AND REFUSED US A LOANER CAR. ALSO, THE REAR DRIVER SIDE WINDOW WOULD NOT ROLL UP AND THEY REPLACE IT BECAUSE IT WAS 'UNDER WARRANTY'. AT 46,000 MILES THE ENGINE BEGAN TO OVER HEAT. I TOOK IT TO THE NEAREST MECHANIC AND WAS INFORMED THAT THE OIL AGAIN WAS 'GUNKED UP' BECAUSE ANTI FREEZE HAD BEEN LEAKING INTO THE ENGINE. AFTER 3 WEEKS, THE DEALER "LAND ROVER OF TULSA' FIRST TOLD US THAT THE ENGINE WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED. THEN LAND ROVER INC TRIED TO TELL US THAT THE ENGINE WOULD BE OUR EXPENSE. THEY TRIED TO INFORM US THAT THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN PROPERLY SERVICED (EVEN THOUGH WE HAD TAKEN IT IN SEVERAL TIMES AT CONSIDERABLE EXPENSE). THEY KEPT THE VEHICLE FOR 3 WEEKS, AND THEN REPLACED SOME PART, TOLD US TO WATCH THE COOLANT AND TO HAVE THE OIL CHANGED EVERY 6,000 MILES. AFTER 247 MILES, HALF A GALLON OF ANTIFREEZE WAS GONE AND THE ENGINE STARTED TO RUN "FUNNY AGAIN". EVEN THOUGH THE DEALER CLAIMED THAT NO ANTI FREEZE WAS IN THE OIL, THEY FORGOT TO CLEAN THE OIL CAP AFTER THEIR "SERVICE". I HAD IT TESTED BY AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC AND ANTI FREEZE WAS FOUND IN THE OIL CAP, WHICH PROVES ANTI FREEZE WAS IN THE OIL. ALSO, THEY CLAIMED A WHEEL BEARING WAS GOING OUT AND THEY WOULD ORDER THE PART AND FIX IT 'UNDER WARRANTY'. THEY SEEM CONFUSED THAT THEIR 'WARRANTY IS NOT A PICK AND CHOOSE TYPE WARRANTY. THIS VEHICLE IS OBVIOUSLY A LEMON. *JB

NHTSA ID
10173902
Incident
Nov 17, 2005
Mileage
30,000 mi

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .