2003 Land Rover Defender Problems
Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component
Data refreshed
What this page shows
Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 2003 Land Rover Defender, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Reports by component
Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category
- Brakes133.3%
- Engine133.3%
- Visibility133.3%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Each component in detail
What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words
Brakes
Reports naming service brakes, the antilock braking system, brake hoses, master cylinders or the parking brake.
From owner reports, verbatim
AT 30,000 MILES, WE TOOK THE VEHICLE IN TO BE "SERVICED" MAINLY BECAUSE ANOTHER MECHANIC TOLD US THAT THE OIL WAS 'GUNKED'. THE DEALER INFORMED US THAT THERE WAS NO PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE OR THE WARRANTY AND REPLACED THE OIL AT A CHARGE OF OVER $94.00. THEN AT 34,000, THE BRAKES SUDDENLY BEGAN TO GRIND AND THE BRAKE LIGHT CAME ON, WE TOOK IT TO THE DEALER AND THEY SAID IT WAS "NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR" AND CHARGED US OVER $355.00 TO FIX THE BRAKES. AFTER ANOTHER 1,000 MILES, THE LIGHT CAME ON AGAIN, WHEN WE CALLED THEM THEY TOLD US TO LEAVE IT WITH THEM FOR A FEW WEEKS AND REFUSED US A LOANER CAR. ALSO, THE REAR DRIVER SIDE WINDOW WOULD NOT ROLL UP AND THEY REPLACE IT BECAUSE IT WAS 'UNDER WARRANTY'. AT 46,000 MILES THE ENGINE BEGAN TO OVER HEAT. I TOOK IT TO THE NEAREST MECHANIC AND WAS INFORMED THAT THE OIL AGAIN WAS 'GUNKED UP' BECAUSE ANTI FREEZE HAD BEEN LEAKING INTO THE ENGINE. AFTER 3 WEEKS, THE DEALER "LAND ROVER OF TULSA' FIRST TOLD US THAT THE ENGINE WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED. THEN LAND ROVER INC TRIED TO TELL US THAT THE ENGINE WOULD BE OUR EXPENSE. THEY TRIED TO INFORM US THAT THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN PROPERLY SERVICED (EVEN THOUGH WE HAD TAKEN IT IN SEVERAL TIMES AT CONSIDERABLE EXPENSE). THEY KEPT THE VEHICLE FOR 3 WEEKS, AND THEN REPLACED SOME PART, TOLD US TO WATCH THE COOLANT AND TO HAVE THE OIL CHANGED EVERY 6,000 MILES. AFTER 247 MILES, HALF A GALLON OF ANTIFREEZE WAS GONE AND THE ENGINE STARTED TO RUN "FUNNY AGAIN". EVEN THOUGH THE DEALER CLAIMED THAT NO ANTI FREEZE WAS IN THE OIL, THEY FORGOT TO CLEAN THE OIL CAP AFTER THEIR "SERVICE". I HAD IT TESTED BY AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC AND ANTI FREEZE WAS FOUND IN THE OIL CAP, WHICH PROVES ANTI FREEZE WAS IN THE OIL. ALSO, THEY CLAIMED A WHEEL BEARING WAS GOING OUT AND THEY WOULD ORDER THE PART AND FIX IT 'UNDER WARRANTY'. THEY SEEM CONFUSED THAT THEIR 'WARRANTY IS NOT A PICK AND CHOOSE TYPE WARRANTY. THIS VEHICLE IS OBVIOUSLY A LEMON. *JB
Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.
Engine
Reports naming the engine itself — including stalling, misfires, oil consumption, cooling and internal engine components.
From owner reports, verbatim
AT 30,000 MILES, WE TOOK THE VEHICLE IN TO BE "SERVICED" MAINLY BECAUSE ANOTHER MECHANIC TOLD US THAT THE OIL WAS 'GUNKED'. THE DEALER INFORMED US THAT THERE WAS NO PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE OR THE WARRANTY AND REPLACED THE OIL AT A CHARGE OF OVER $94.00. THEN AT 34,000, THE BRAKES SUDDENLY BEGAN TO GRIND AND THE BRAKE LIGHT CAME ON, WE TOOK IT TO THE DEALER AND THEY SAID IT WAS "NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR" AND CHARGED US OVER $355.00 TO FIX THE BRAKES. AFTER ANOTHER 1,000 MILES, THE LIGHT CAME ON AGAIN, WHEN WE CALLED THEM THEY TOLD US TO LEAVE IT WITH THEM FOR A FEW WEEKS AND REFUSED US A LOANER CAR. ALSO, THE REAR DRIVER SIDE WINDOW WOULD NOT ROLL UP AND THEY REPLACE IT BECAUSE IT WAS 'UNDER WARRANTY'. AT 46,000 MILES THE ENGINE BEGAN TO OVER HEAT. I TOOK IT TO THE NEAREST MECHANIC AND WAS INFORMED THAT THE OIL AGAIN WAS 'GUNKED UP' BECAUSE ANTI FREEZE HAD BEEN LEAKING INTO THE ENGINE. AFTER 3 WEEKS, THE DEALER "LAND ROVER OF TULSA' FIRST TOLD US THAT THE ENGINE WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED. THEN LAND ROVER INC TRIED TO TELL US THAT THE ENGINE WOULD BE OUR EXPENSE. THEY TRIED TO INFORM US THAT THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN PROPERLY SERVICED (EVEN THOUGH WE HAD TAKEN IT IN SEVERAL TIMES AT CONSIDERABLE EXPENSE). THEY KEPT THE VEHICLE FOR 3 WEEKS, AND THEN REPLACED SOME PART, TOLD US TO WATCH THE COOLANT AND TO HAVE THE OIL CHANGED EVERY 6,000 MILES. AFTER 247 MILES, HALF A GALLON OF ANTIFREEZE WAS GONE AND THE ENGINE STARTED TO RUN "FUNNY AGAIN". EVEN THOUGH THE DEALER CLAIMED THAT NO ANTI FREEZE WAS IN THE OIL, THEY FORGOT TO CLEAN THE OIL CAP AFTER THEIR "SERVICE". I HAD IT TESTED BY AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC AND ANTI FREEZE WAS FOUND IN THE OIL CAP, WHICH PROVES ANTI FREEZE WAS IN THE OIL. ALSO, THEY CLAIMED A WHEEL BEARING WAS GOING OUT AND THEY WOULD ORDER THE PART AND FIX IT 'UNDER WARRANTY'. THEY SEEM CONFUSED THAT THEIR 'WARRANTY IS NOT A PICK AND CHOOSE TYPE WARRANTY. THIS VEHICLE IS OBVIOUSLY A LEMON. *JB
Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.
Visibility
Reports naming windshields, glass, wipers, defrosters and mirrors.
From owner reports, verbatim
AT 30,000 MILES, WE TOOK THE VEHICLE IN TO BE "SERVICED" MAINLY BECAUSE ANOTHER MECHANIC TOLD US THAT THE OIL WAS 'GUNKED'. THE DEALER INFORMED US THAT THERE WAS NO PROBLEM WITH THE VEHICLE OR THE WARRANTY AND REPLACED THE OIL AT A CHARGE OF OVER $94.00. THEN AT 34,000, THE BRAKES SUDDENLY BEGAN TO GRIND AND THE BRAKE LIGHT CAME ON, WE TOOK IT TO THE DEALER AND THEY SAID IT WAS "NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR" AND CHARGED US OVER $355.00 TO FIX THE BRAKES. AFTER ANOTHER 1,000 MILES, THE LIGHT CAME ON AGAIN, WHEN WE CALLED THEM THEY TOLD US TO LEAVE IT WITH THEM FOR A FEW WEEKS AND REFUSED US A LOANER CAR. ALSO, THE REAR DRIVER SIDE WINDOW WOULD NOT ROLL UP AND THEY REPLACE IT BECAUSE IT WAS 'UNDER WARRANTY'. AT 46,000 MILES THE ENGINE BEGAN TO OVER HEAT. I TOOK IT TO THE NEAREST MECHANIC AND WAS INFORMED THAT THE OIL AGAIN WAS 'GUNKED UP' BECAUSE ANTI FREEZE HAD BEEN LEAKING INTO THE ENGINE. AFTER 3 WEEKS, THE DEALER "LAND ROVER OF TULSA' FIRST TOLD US THAT THE ENGINE WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED. THEN LAND ROVER INC TRIED TO TELL US THAT THE ENGINE WOULD BE OUR EXPENSE. THEY TRIED TO INFORM US THAT THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN PROPERLY SERVICED (EVEN THOUGH WE HAD TAKEN IT IN SEVERAL TIMES AT CONSIDERABLE EXPENSE). THEY KEPT THE VEHICLE FOR 3 WEEKS, AND THEN REPLACED SOME PART, TOLD US TO WATCH THE COOLANT AND TO HAVE THE OIL CHANGED EVERY 6,000 MILES. AFTER 247 MILES, HALF A GALLON OF ANTIFREEZE WAS GONE AND THE ENGINE STARTED TO RUN "FUNNY AGAIN". EVEN THOUGH THE DEALER CLAIMED THAT NO ANTI FREEZE WAS IN THE OIL, THEY FORGOT TO CLEAN THE OIL CAP AFTER THEIR "SERVICE". I HAD IT TESTED BY AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC AND ANTI FREEZE WAS FOUND IN THE OIL CAP, WHICH PROVES ANTI FREEZE WAS IN THE OIL. ALSO, THEY CLAIMED A WHEEL BEARING WAS GOING OUT AND THEY WOULD ORDER THE PART AND FIX IT 'UNDER WARRANTY'. THEY SEEM CONFUSED THAT THEIR 'WARRANTY IS NOT A PICK AND CHOOSE TYPE WARRANTY. THIS VEHICLE IS OBVIOUSLY A LEMON. *JB
Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.
Elsewhere on this vehicle
Data sources
- NHTSA Office of Defects Investigation — owner-reported complaints and the components recorded on them
Data on this page last refreshed .