1999 Lincoln Town Car Engine Problems

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 LINCOLN TOWN CAR. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING AT AN UNDISCLOSED SPEED, THE CONTACT BECAME AWARE OF NOTICED LIQUID DRIPPING FROM THE AIR VENTS. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A LOCAL MECHANIC FOR DIAGNOSIS AND REPAIR. THE DIAGNOSIS WAS A FAILURE WITH THE INTAKE MANIFOLD. THE DEALER WAS NOT CONTACTED AND THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 150,000.

NHTSA ID

11306764

Incident

Jan 8, 2020

Mileage

150,000 mi

LINCOLN TOWN CAR, 1999, LEAKING INTAKE MANIFOLD DUE TO DEFECTIVE PART ORIGINALLY USED IN MANUFACTURE OF CAR THAT FORD WAS REPORTEDLY AWARE OF BUT HAS NEVER RECALLED THE CARS FOR REPLACEMENT OF A BETTER PART NOW WITH METAL PARTS TO PREVENT CRACKING THAT OCCURRED IN THE ORIGINAL ALL PLASTIC MANIFOLD INTAKES. AT ONE TIME THERE WAS A VERY UNDER-PUBLISHED LAWSUIT ENABLING OWNERS WHO HAD ALREADY FIXED THIS DEFICIENCY A $700+ REBATE BUT THE OFFER WAS ONLY FOR A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME. APPARENTLY THE FORMER OWNER OF MY LINCOLN TOWN CAR KNEW NOTHING ABOUT THIS OPPORTUNITY AND PROBLEM WAS DIAGNOSED 2 YEARS AGO. PREVIOUS OWNER THOUGHT IT WAS NO BIG DEAL. TODAY MANY FORD OWNERS HAVE BEEN LEFT HOLDING THE BAG FOR THIS EXPENSIVE AND SOMETIMES ENGINE DAMAGING REPAIR WHEN THEY REPORTEDLY KNEW ABOUT THE DEFECT AND CONTINUED SELLING THE CARS. COOLANT CONSTANTLY LEAKS OUT CAUSING POSSIBLE ENGINE DAMAGE AS WELL AS RISK OF OVERHEATING IF COOLANT ISN'T CONSTANTLY ADDED. REPAIR IS APPROXIMATELY $800-$1000. MANY FORDS HAVE BEEN AFFECTED.

NHTSA ID

10993040

Incident

May 30, 2017

Mileage

113,000 mi

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 LINCOLN TOWN CAR. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE VEHICLE HAD BEEN MAKING AN ABNORMAL NOISE NEAR THE ENGINE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHERE IT WAS DIAGNOSED THAT THE ENGINE PISTON HAD BEEN ENCOUNTERING THE CYLINDER WALL AND THE ENGINE NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 35,000.

NHTSA ID

10818742

Incident

Sep 7, 2015

Mileage

35,000 mi

THE INTAKE MANIFOLD ON MY 1999 LINCOLN TOWN CAR DEVELOPED A CRACK AND BEGAN LEAKING ALL OVER THE ENGINE . WE BOUGHT THE CAR IN 2008 AND THE MANIFOLD HAD NOT BEEN CHANGED AND WE KNEW NOTHING OF THE "SETTLEMENT" WITH FORD TO REPLACE THEM.. I CONTACTED FORD AND THEY TOLD ME THAT AGREEMENT ENDED MARCH 16, 2006.. NOW THE FORD DEALER WANTS $1000 TO REPLACE IT.. WHY SHOULD THE CAR OWNER HAVE TO PAY AN EXCESSIVE AMOUNT WHEN FORD IS RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING PLASTIC IN AN ENGINE COMPARTMENT THAT GETS HOT AND IS BOUND TO CRACK AT SOME POINT.. JUST A WARNING .. DON'T BUY A TOWN CAR WITHOUT CHECKING ON RECALLS, BULLETINS, AND SETTLEMENTS...

NHTSA ID

10732489

Incident

Jul 2, 2015

Mileage

109,000 mi

FORD MOTOR COMPANY, P.O. BOX 1904, DEARBORN, MICHIGAN 48121, CHOSE TO NOT WARN A SEGMENT OF THEIR FULL-SIZE CAR OWNERS WHO ARE "CIVILIAN" THAT THEIR CARS WERE PRODUCED WITH A PLASTIC INTAKE MANIFOLD THAT WAS FAILING AND CAUSING ENORMOUS COOLANT PROBLEMS FOR THEIR 4.6L V-8 ENGINES AND OTHER COMPONENT ENGINE PARTS. BECAUSE FORD DID NOT NOTIFY ME OF THEIR KNOWN PROBLEMS WITH THE INTAKE MANIFOLD THE DEFECTED PART CAUSED MY CAR TO REPEATEDLY LOOSE COOLANT AND CAUSE MY CAR TO OVERHEAT AND FINALLY BLOW MY INTAKE MANIFOLD GASKET CAUSING ME TO REPLACE DEFECTIVE INTAKE MANIFOLD (COPY OF SHOP BILL ATTACHED) AND CAUSING UNKNOWN DAMAGES TO MY ENGINE. I AM REQUESTING A REFUND FOR THESE REPAIRS.

NHTSA ID

10397689

Incident

Apr 6, 2011

Mileage

157,812 mi

I WAS NEVER NOTIFIED ABOUT THE FORD RECALLS ON INTAKE MANIFOLD, I RECENTLY FOUND OUT THAT MY MANIFOLD HAD CRACKED AND THAT PRIOR TO IT BRAKING FORD HAD SETTLE A LAWSUIT REGARDING SAID PROBLEM. I HAVE NEVER NOR HAS MY GODFATHER BE NOTIFIED ABOUT THE RECALL ITEM. KNOWN FORD RECALLS: 97M91, 99M01, 01M02 DID NOT APPLY TO PRIVATELY OWNED VEHICLES WHY. *TR

NHTSA ID

10377897

Incident

Jan 4, 2011

Mileage

150,000 mi

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1999 LINCOLN TOWN CAR. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 40 MPH, THE CONTACT HEARD A LOUD CRACK. HE PULLED OVER BUT DID NOT FIND THE CAUSE OF THE NOISE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A LOCAL REPAIR SHOP WHERE THE CONTACT WAS ADVISED THAT THE FRONT BALL JOINTS NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE CONTACT CALLED THE MANUFACTURER IN REGARDS TO RECALL 98V322000 (SUSPENSION: FRONT: CONTROL ARM: LOWER BALL JOINT) BUT WAS TOLD THAT THE VEHICLE WAS NOT INCLUDED. THE CONTACT ALSO STATED THAT THERE WAS A CRACK IN THE INTAKE MANIFOLD AND A MECHANIC TOLD HIM THAT IT NEEDED TO BE REPLACED. THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THE CURRENT AND FAILURE MILEAGES WERE APPROXIMATELY 111,500.

NHTSA ID

10359462

Incident

Sep 29, 2010

Mileage

111,500 mi

THE INTAKE MANIFOLD ON MY 1999 LINCOLN TOWN CAR IS LEAKING COOLANT. MY WIFE NOTICED A NOISE COMING FROM UNDER THE HOOD, WHEN I TURNED ON HER CAR TO LISTEN TO THE NOISE I COULD TELL IT WAS THE FAN BELT SQUEAKING. WHILE THE ENGINE WAS RUNNING I OPENED THE HOOD AND I COULD SEE THE COOLANT RUNNING OUT OF THE THERMOSTAT HOUSING. I THOUGHT IT WAS A BAD THERMOSTAT SO I BOUGHT A NEW ONE AND REPLACED IT MYSELF. IT WASN'T UNTIL I TURNED THE CAR ON FOLLOWING THE REPAIRS THAT I SAW THE COOLANT COMING FROM CRACKS IN THE MANIFOLD. I DID NOT KNOW OF THE FORD RECALLS 97M91, 99M01, 01M02 UNTIL I WAS RESEARCHING TO BUY A NEW MANIFOLD ON THE INTERNET. I BOUGHT THIS CAR BACK IN 2000 AND NEVER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE RECALL. THIS VEHICLE HAS 160,000 MILES ON IT AND STILL RUNS GREAT, UNTIL NOW. I FEEL I SHOULD HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED OF THIS RECALL AND FORD MOTOR CO. SHOULD REIMBURSE FOR MY EXPENSES. *TR

NHTSA ID

10335145

Incident

May 22, 2010

Mileage

165,000 mi

1999 LINCOLN TOWN CAR, CRACKED INTAKE MANIFOLD. MY HUSBAND, LEWIS BARBER, JR., SPOKE WITH FORD TODAY AND WAS TOLD THAT FORD WOULD NOT REIMBURSE REPLACEMENT COST. EVEN THOUGH FORD TOLD MY HUSBAND THAT THEY MAILED NOTICE TO ME IN JULY 2005, I NEVER RECEIVED ANY SUCH NOTICE. I KEEP VERY GOOD RECORDS, AND MY CAR HAS BEEN IN AN AUTHORIZED DEALERS REPAIR SHOP BUT NO ONE TOLD ME ABOUT THE CRACKING INTAKE MANIFOLD PROBLEM OR ANY LAWSUIT "SETTLEMENT". I FOUND FORDS NUMBER FROM A LETTER THEY SENT ME DATED AUGUST 2000, WHICH CONCERNED A PROBLEM WITH TIRE JACKS --AT THAT TIME I LIVED IN OKLAHOMA CITY. THERE MAY BE HUNDREDS OF OTHERS WHO ARE SIMILAR SITUATED. AGAIN, FORD DID NOT GIVE ME ANY NOTICE OF THIS PROBLEM. I PAID $1,179.56 TO C&F AUTOMOTIVE (2439 N. DECATUR BLVD, LAS VEGAS, NV 89108-0000 - 702-647-7787) TO REPLACE THE CRACKED MANIFOLD. *TR

NHTSA ID

10210084

Incident

Nov 21, 2007

Mileage

112,177 mi

(1)NORMAL DRIVING; NOTHING UNUSUAL (2)LEAKING OF COOLANT INTO AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM; OILY SUBSTANCE ON INSIDE OF WINDSHIELD (3)HEATER CORE REPLACED 3 TIMES IN LESS THAN 6 MONTHS; FIRST TIME AT MY EXPENSE. 3RD TIME I WAS TOLD THAT FORD MOTOR COMPANY HAD 'FOUND A SOLUTION' TO KEEP IT FROM HAPPENING AGAIN...AT AN ADDITIONAL COST OF $464.27

NHTSA ID

10134216

Incident

Oct 5, 2004

Mileage

124,592 mi

FORD MOTOR CO. CAR SERVICE ENGINE LIGHT COME ON.

NHTSA ID

10098624

Incident

Nov 5, 2004

Mileage

100,000 mi

WHILE DRIVING, THE VEHICLE STARTED TO SHAKE VIBRATE. THE CONSUMER TOOK THE VEHICLE FOR AN INSPECTION AND THE MECHANIC INFORMED THE CONSUMER THE MANIFOLD HAD CRACKED. *JB

NHTSA ID

10096585

Incident

Oct 11, 2004

Mileage

100,000 mi

CONSUMER NOTICED COOLANT LEVELS WERE DROPPING. DEALERSHIP INDICATED THAT BECAUSE THE LEVELS WERE DROPPING AT A SLOW PACE IT WAS NORMAL. THREE MONTHS LATER, COOLANT LEVEL DROPPED AT A RAPID PACE. DEALERSHIP THEN INDICATED THAT THE INTAKE MANIFOLD WAS LEAKING ENGINE COOLANT. CONSUMER INDICATED THAT THERE WAS A TSB ON THIS ISSUE THAT INDICATED THAT THE COOLANT LEAKED AND SPRAYED ONTO THE ALTERNATOR, CAUSING A SHORT. THIS TSB ONLY APPLIED TO POLICE VEHICLES AND LIMOUSINES BECAUSE THEIR MILEAGE WAS HIGHER. TSB NOT FOUND IN ARTEMIS.*AK *MR

NHTSA ID

10061690

Mileage

92,000 mi

WE PURCHASED TWO NEW TOWNCARS FROM GERMAIN LINC.-MERC., NAPLES, FL, IN 1999 AND 2000 MY CAR'S,VIN [XXX], 1999 TOWN CAR, AND MY WIFE'S 2000 TOWN CAR, VIN [XXX]. MY FIRST COMPLAINT IS REGARDING MY CAR THAT DEVELOPED ELECTRONIC PROBLEMS RIGHT AFTER IT RAN OUT OF WARRANTY, AND NEEDED A $500 REPAIR. A WEEK LATER, IT DEVELOPED A LEAK, AND WAS REPAIRED AT $1000. IS THIS PLANNED OBSOLESCENCE? THIS WAS AT 56,000 MILES OF USE. SHOULDN'T THE DEALER CHECK BASIC SYSTEMS AND MAKE SURE THEY ARE WELL MAINTAINED? MY WIFE'S TOWNCAR HAS A FAR MORE SERIOUS AND HAZARDOUS HISTORY. SHE, ALONG WITH OUR GRANDSONS, EXPERIENCED A TIRE BLOWOUT AT 33,000 MILES. AFTER THE TIRE WAS CHANGED TO THE SPARE, SHE DROVE TO THE DEALER AND WAS TOLD THAT BOTH REAR TIRES SHOULD BE REPLACED FOR SAFETY. SHE AGREED. WHEN SHE PICKED UP THE CAR, ALL 4 TIRES (!)HAD BEEN REPLACED AT THE COST OF $548. THERE WAS NO PRICE ADJUSTMENT FOR ANY OF THE 4 TIRES REMOVED. ON 12-23-02 (3 DAYS LATER) SHE REPORTED TO THE DEALER THAT THE BRAKES WERE NOISY (SQUEAKED). WHEN SHE GOT THE CAR, THE BILL FOR THE BRAKES WAS $420. WHEN DRIVING OUR 2 DAUGHTERS AND 2 GRANDSONS THE FOLLOWING DAY, THE BRAKES DID NOT HOLD, AND SHE WAS UNABLE TO STOP AT A RED LIGHT, NEARLY HITTING THE CAR IN FRONT OF HER. ONLY BY FORCED PUMPING WITH BOTH FEET, AND SWERVING INTO THE TURN LANE, DID SHE AVOID A CRASH. HAD CARS BEEN COMING IN THAT TURN LANE, ANY NUMBER OF PEOPLE, PARTICULARLY IN OUR FAMILY, COULD HAVE BEEN KILLED. SHOULDN'T THE CUSTOMER "ADVISOR" ADVISE A MINOR BRAKE-PAD REPLACEMENT RATHER THAN WAIT FOR A MAJOR EXPENSIVE/DANGEROUS PROBLEM? WE STRONGLY DOUBT THAT WE WOULD CONSIDER ANOTHER FORD PRODUCT. THIS IS A SHORT HISTORY OF 2 REGULARLY-DEALER-MAINTAINED LUXURY CARS. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR

NHTSA ID

10070362

Incident

Apr 15, 2003

Mileage

53,000 mi

CAR HAS A PROBLEN IN THE STEERING BOX. TOOK IT TO A SPECIALIST AND FORD DISCOUNTED IT. THEY SENT A LINCOLN REP DOWN AND HE JUST LIED TO ME ABOUT THE PROBLEM SAID IT WAS A FACTORY FLAW AND COULD NOT FIX , THEN I TOOK THE CAR INTO THE DEALER FOR A PINGING AND THEY SAID THEY COULDN'T HEAR IT (NOTHING WAS DONE)THEN LATER ON A TRIP IT WENT HAYWIRE SOUNDED LIKE A BIG DIESEL TRUCK ON THE HIGHWAY AND RAN LIKE CRAP , SUCKING GAS ALSO, THEN CHANGED DEALERS AND THEY SAID THEY COULDEN'T FIND A PING . I GRABED ME A MECHANIC AND WE TOOK A LITTLE RIDE AND BEFORE I COULD GET IT BACK IT WAS PINGING (TOOK THEM 3 WEEKS TO FIX WITH ME COMING UP ALMOST DAILY TO TEST IT, AND NOBODY CAN ADJUST THE HEAD LIGHTS ON THE CAR THAT IS BAD ITS IDIOT PROOF

NHTSA ID

10070305

Incident

May 15, 2003

Mileage

83,000 mi

WHEN DRIVING AT VARIOUS SPEEDS INTAKE MANIFOLD CRACKED, CAUSING ANTI FREEZE TO LEAK OUT. *AK

NHTSA ID

10038020

Incident

Aug 29, 2003

Mileage

77,000 mi

WHILE DRIVING AT 25 MPH VEHICLE STALLS. CONSUMER HAS TO COME TO A COMPLETE STOP TO START AGAIN. CONSUMER FEELS THIS IS VERY DANGEROUS.*AK CONSUMER STATES TRANSMISSION VIBRATES AFTER DRIVING AND IS ALSO NOISY. *SLC

NHTSA ID

894565

Incident

Oct 1, 2000