RoadVitals

2000 Mci 102DL3 Problems

Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component

Data refreshed

Owner complaintsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
1
Latest Feb 6, 2012
Components namedHow many of our component categories appear on at least one report for this model year. One report can name several.
1
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0

What this page shows

Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 2000 Mci 102DL3, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Reports by component

Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category

  • Suspension1100.0%

Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.

Each component in detail

What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words

Suspension

Reports naming suspension components — springs, struts, shocks, control arms and related hardware.

1
report

From owner reports, verbatim

FIRST GROUP ALLEGES TO HAVE EXPERIENCED SEVERAL DRIVESHAFT FAILURES BEGINNING IN MARCH 2010 WHICH WERE NOT CONTAINED BY THE SAFETY LOOPS ON THE SUBJECT MCI BUSES. THEY BELIEVE THAT TWO OF THE EVENTS RESULTED IN MULTIPLE INJURIES AND FATALITIES DUE AN "UNLOCKED CONDITION" OF THE STEERABLE TAG AXLE AND A LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL. THE DESIGN IN QUESTION HAS BEEN IN PRODUCTION SINCE THE EARLY 1990S. A STEERABLE TAG AXLE IS USED TO INCREASE THE GVWR WHILE REDUCING THE TURNING RADIUS AND MINIMIZING THE TIRE SCRUB WHICH WOULD NORMALLY OCCUR WITH A TANDEM REAR AXLE CONFIGURATION. IN THIS CASE, THE TRANSMISSION COUPLES TO THE DRIVESHAFT WHICH THEN PASSES THROUGH A GUARDIAN STRUCTURE IN THE TAG AXLE AND A DEDICATED SAFETY LOOP BEFORE IT COUPLES TO THE DRIVE AXLE. INCREASED ENGINE LENGTH IN THE LAST 20 YEARS HAS SHORTENED THE DRIVESHAFT.

NHTSA ID 10447575 · filed Feb 6, 2012

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Elsewhere on this vehicle

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .