RoadVitals

2011 Mercedes-Benz AMG CLS63 Owner Complaints

Reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers, shown in full

Data refreshed

Complaints on fileComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
1
Latest Jun 17, 2013
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0
Filed in the last 12 monthsReports filed with NHTSA in the trailing 365 days. Recent volume reflects attention and vehicle age as much as anything else.
0
Reports on file since Jun 17, 2013

What this page shows

Our database holds 1 NHTSA owner-reported complaint for the 2011 Mercedes-Benz AMG CLS63. Each one is a report filed by an owner or driver and published by NHTSA without most of them being verified. A complaint is not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. Narratives are shown exactly as filed.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Complaints, most recent first

Showing 1–1 of 1

Other / unspecifiedTires & wheels
Filed Jun 17, 2013

THE FIRST TIME ON 05.01.2013, I WAS APPROACHING THE EXPWY EXIT (AT ABOUT 45MPH) WHEN I HEARD A LOAD POP & THE CAR SYSTEM WARNING FOR LOW TIRE PRESSURE CAME ON. I PULLED OVER AND INSPECTED THE FRONT PASSENGER TIRE THAT APPEARED TO BE FLAT. ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE FROM MERCEDES BENZ- SAN JUAN CAME & THE GENTLEMAN PROCEEDED TO CHANGE THE TIRES. UPON INSPECTION, HE STATED THAT THE TIRE HAD BLOWN OUT FROM THE INSIDE WAS AND THERE APPEARED TO BE NO PUNCTURE DAMAGE TO THE TIRE. LATER, THE DEALERSHIP ALSO STATED THAT THERE WAS NO IDENTIFIABLE PUNCTURE MARK AND THAT THE TREADING WAS LIKE NEW. MY 2011 CLS63 HAS ONLY 23,000 MILES. THE DEALERSHIP DETERMINED THAT THE BRIDGESTONE POTENZA TIRES THAT I HAD WERE NOT COVERED BY THE WARRANTY, AND PROCEED TO CHARGE ME FOR THE REPLACEMENT. THEN ON 06.09.2013 THE FRONT DRIVERSIDE TIRE BLEW OUT AS I WAS DRIVING HOME, ON A 30 MPH ROAD. SAME SCENARIO, I HEARD A LOUD POP AND PULLED OVER. ROADSIDE ASSISTANCE WAS AGAIN ON SITE, AND THE FRONT DRIVERSIDE TIRE HAD BLOWN OUT FROM THE INSIDE WALL. UPON DISCUSSING THE OBVIOUS TIRE DEFECT WITH THE SAME DEALERSHIP, THEY AGAIN STATED THAT THE TREADING WAS LIKE NEW AND THERE WAS NO IDENTIFIABLE PUNCTURE DAMAGE TO THE TIRE. THEY LATER STATED THAT I MUST HAVE HIT A SIDEWALK TO MAKE THE TIRE BURST. I TOLD THE DEALERSHIP THAT IF I HAD HIT A SIDEWALK, WOULDN'T THE DAMAGE HAVE BEEN ON THE OUTER WALL? OR AT LEAST, THE TIRE WOULD HAVE VISIBLE DAMAGE CAUSED BY HITTING THE SIDEWALK? THEY LATER STATED THAT AFTER FURTHER REVIEW THEY HAD IDENTIFIED A PUNCTURE MARK. UPON QUESTIONING THEIR NEW FINDINGS AND MY PREVIOUS EXPERIENCE, JUST ONE MONTH EARLIER WITH THE OTHER FRONT TIRE, THE DEALERSHIP STATED THAT THE WARRANTY WOULD NOT COVER ROAD HAZARD DAMAGES - EVEN THOUGH THEY DID NOT IDENTIFY ANY, AND THEY ALSO KEPT NO RECORD OF MY FIRST COMPLAINT. HOW IS IT THAT THE TIRES POSE A HAZARD AT SUCH A LOW SPEED, ON A SPORTS CAR? *TR

NHTSA ID
10520226
Incident
May 1, 2013
Mileage
23,200 mi

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .