RoadVitals

1997 Mercedes-Benz E Class Owner Complaints

Reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers, shown in full

Data refreshed

Complaints on fileComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
38
Latest Dec 18, 2013
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
1
Filed in the last 12 monthsReports filed with NHTSA in the trailing 365 days. Recent volume reflects attention and vehicle age as much as anything else.
0
Reports on file since Feb 1, 1999

What this page shows

Our database holds 38 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 1997 Mercedes-Benz E Class. Each one is a report filed by an owner or driver and published by NHTSA without most of them being verified. A complaint is not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. Narratives are shown exactly as filed.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Complaints, most recent first

Showing 1–25 of 38 · page 1 of 2

Suspension
Filed Dec 18, 2013

I TOOK MY CAR INTO GET THE SUSPENSION FIXED AND WAS TOLD THAT THE SPRING PERCH THAT ATTACHED THE SPRING TO THE CAR HAS RUSTED THROUGH AND IS ABOUT TO BREAK. LUCKILY I FOUND IT BEFORE I HAD A BAD ACCIDENT. I AM IN THE PROCESS OF CHECKING WITH MERCEDES TO SEE IF THEY WILL STAND BY A POOR DESIGN ISSUE AND REPAIR IT. I AM AMAZED THAT SOMEONE HAS NOT CONTACTED OWNERS OF OLDER CARS AS THIS COULD BE A VERY DANGEROUS ISSUE FOR THOSE NOT FORTUNATE TO GET THINGS CHECKED OUT. I AM NOT DRIVING THE CAR UNTIL SOME DECISION IS MADE. *TR

NHTSA ID
10556553
Incident
Dec 16, 2013
Mileage
96,000 mi
Suspension
Filed Jul 27, 2012

I WAS COMING OFF WEST RT 46. I CAME TO A STOP SIGN,MADE A RIGHT AND AS I WAS DRIVING HEARD A THUMP NOISE....THEN AS I DROVE A SQUEAKING NOISE AND I PULLED OVER,LOOKED AT THE CAR ,AROUND IT AND UNDER IT AND DIDN'T SEE ANYTHING. I DROVE IT SLOWLY ABT A MILE HOME. WHEN I GOT HOME I OPENED THE HOOD AND DIDN'T SEE ANYTHING. I DROVE IT TO MY MECHANIC AROUND THE CORNER AND HE TOLD ME I HAD A SPRING COIL FAILURE. I RESEARCHED THIS ISSUE AND FOUND THAT THIS WAS PREVALENT IN CERTAIN MERCEDES VEHICLES AND THAT THERE WAS A RECALL IN CANADA FOR THIS FAILING PART. I'M ATTEMPTING TO HAVE MERCEDES COVER SOME OF THE COSTS TO HAVE THIS REPAIRED. *TR

NHTSA ID
10467941
Incident
Jul 25, 2012
Mileage
139,535 mi
BrakesSteering
Filed Feb 24, 2010
Crash reported1 injury reported

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2003 MERCEDES BENZ E420. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 35 MPH IN LIGHTLY DRIZZLED WEATHER CONDITIONS. THERE WAS A LOSS OF STEERING CONTROL. THE DRIVER EXPERIENCED DIFFICULTY IN TURNING THE STEERING WHEEL. SUDDENLY, PRESSURE WAS APPLIED TO THE BRAKE PEDAL AND THE VEHICLE FAILED TO SLOW DOWN. THE VEHICLE CRASHED INTO A UTILITY POLE. THE POLICE WAS CALLED TO THE SCENE. THE DRIVER SUSTAINED MINOR INJURIES. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO THE RESIDENCE. THE CONTACT STATED THE FAILURE WAS RELATED TO THE ANTI-LOCK BRAKE VACUUM BOOSTER SYSTEM. THE INSURANCE COMPANY INSPECTED THE VEHICLE. THE CAUSE OF FAILURE WAS NOT DETERMINED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 80,000.

NHTSA ID
10313837
Incident
Nov 10, 2007
Mileage
80,000 mi
Suspension
Filed Nov 9, 2009

WHILE DRIVING, HEARD A RATTLING SOUND FROM THE FRONT END OF THE CAR. SHORT WHILE LATER, STARTED TO PROCEED FROM A STOP AND THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE SUSPENSION COIL SPRING CAME OFF THE CAR AND EXITED OUT THE WHEEL WELL WITH A BIG BANG AND ROLLED DOWN THE STREET ABOUT 75 FEET. *TR

NHTSA ID
10291568
Incident
Nov 8, 2009
Mileage
102,000 mi
Suspension
Filed Apr 25, 2008

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 1997 MERCEDES BENZ E300 DIESEL. WHILE SERVICING THE VEHICLE, THE CONTACT NOTICED THAT THE SPRING PERCH ON THE FRONT DRIVER AND PASSENGER SIDES WAS RUSTING AND SEPARATED FROM THE SUSPENSION CHASSIS. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN DIAGNOSED BY THE DEALER. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 140,000.

NHTSA ID
10225736
Incident
Mar 5, 2008
Mileage
140,000 mi
Body & structure
Filed Apr 18, 2008

I HAVE A 1997 E420 MERCEDES THAT MY WIFE AND OUR ONE MONTH OLD BABY DRIVE DAILY. WELL SHE TOLD ME SHE HEARD SOME STRANGE NOISES COMING FROM THE WHEEL AREA OF THE FRONT LEFT TIRE. I TOLD HER THAT SHE BETTER LET US HAVE IT CHECKED OUT BEFORE DRIVING THE CAR ANYMORE. I TOOK THE CAR TO MY MECHANIC AND HE FOUND THAT THE SPRING PERCH WAS HANGING ON THE FRAME BY A THREAD OF METAL. FORTUNATELY NO ONE WAS HURT AND NO ACCIDENT OCCURRED. AS IT TURNS OUT THIS HAS HAPPENED TO A NUMBER OF CARS LIKE MINE, IT SHOULD BE SOMETHING THAT IS RECALLED WITH OUT A DOUBT. SOMEONE ELSE'S WIFE AND BABY COULD HAVE BEEN IN A MAJOR ACCIDENT IF THEY DID NOT HAVE THE SENSE TO GET THIS CHECKED OUT. *TR

NHTSA ID
10224905
Incident
Apr 15, 2008
Mileage
144,000 mi
Electrical
Filed Mar 24, 2008

MY MB E300D'S ENGINE WILL CUT OFF FOR NO APPARENT REASON. IT STARTED GRADUALLY JUST CUTTING OFF WHILE SITTING AT AN INTERSECTION OR WHILE SLOWING TO A STOP. FEELING IT WAS ANYTHING FROM FUEL TO COMPUTER PROBLEMS I TOOK IT TO THE SHOP ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS. THEY ADVISED THEY COULD NOT FIND THE PROBLEM AND WANTED TO START REPLACING PARTS LIKE RELAYS. THE PROBLEM CAME TO A HEAD WHILE MY WIFE WAS ACCELERATING ON AN INTERSTATE RAMP INTO TRAFFIC RUNNING 70MPH. THE CAR CUT OFF CAUSING NEAR CATASTROPHIC ACCIDENTS. THIS IS OF COURSE UNACCEPTABLE. MERCEDES IS ACTING LIKE THIS IS NOT A BIG PROBLEM. UPON SEARCHING THE WEB, I FOUND THAT THIS IS A COMMON PROBLEM -"CUTTING OFF FOR NO APPARENT REASON" AND SO FAR THIS AGENCY SEEMS TO HAVE NOT DONE MUCH TO FORCE MERCEDES TO CORRECT THIS EXTREMELY HAZARDOUS CONDITION. I CAN NOT KEEP DRIVING THE CAR UNTIL SOMETHING BREAKS BAD ENOUGH FOR MERCEDES TO FIND IT. THE WIRING HARNESS IS THE KNOWN CULPRIT THOUGH MERCEDES WON'T ADMIT IT. *TR

NHTSA ID
10222207
Incident
Jan 1, 2008
Mileage
201,000 mi
Suspension
Filed Sep 11, 2007

MR. GARY BOUND MERCEDES BENZ 3 PARAGON MONTVALE NJ 07645 DEAR MR. BOUND, I WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST YOUR ASSISTANCE ON A VERY TROUBLING MATTER. I HAVE 1997 MERCEDES E 420, , (IT HAS 81,000 MILES) WHICH RECENTLY DEVELOPED A SERIOUS DRIVING SAFETY ISSUE, MORE PRECISELY A LACK OF STEERING CONTROL. I WAS SO ALARMED BY THE HANDLING; I TOOK MY VEHICLE TO THE CLOSEST REPAIR SHOP FOR AN ANALYSIS OF THE PROBLEM. (I DIDN'T FEEL SAFE DRIVING THE VEHICLE THE EXTRA DISTANCE TO A MB DEALER). AFTER A QUICK EXAMINATION THEY TOLD ME THAT THE COIL SPRING TOWER HAD BECOME DETACHED FROM THE FRAME. THEY SAID THE REPAIR WAS POSSIBLY IN THE THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS RANGE. THEY ALSO TOLD ME THEY HAD SEEN THIS PROBLEM MANY TIMES, PARTICULARLY WITH THE E SERIES. ACCORDING TO THEM IT HAS TO DO WITH THE TYPE OF STEEL USED, THE WELDS, AND AN UNUSUAL AMOUNT OF EXTRAORDINARY METAL FATIGUE REGARDLESS OF MILES OR AGE OF VEHICLE. THEY ALSO INFORMED ME THAT MERCEDES BENZ WAS AWARE OF THIS ISSUE, AND MB WAS CONSIDERING ABSORBING THE COSTS OF THESE REPAIRS, EVEN THOUGH THIS ISSUE HAS OCCURRED AFTER THE WARRANTY HAS EXPIRED. I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT NHTSA IS SO CONCERNED ABOUT A PATTERN OF THESE FAILURES THAT THEY ARE URGING AN OFFICIAL RECALL. BUT UNDERSTANDABLY MB WOULD PREFER NOT TO DEAL WITH AN OFFICIAL RECALL. NOW OBVIOUSLY I'M CONCERNED ABOUT MY SAFETY, AS WELL AS GETTING A QUALITY REPAIR TO THE VEHICLE ASAP-- WITHOUT PAYING THOUSANDS OF DOLLARS FOR THIS TO BE RESOLVED OUT OF MY POCKET.. I WAS GIVEN YOUR NAME BY A MAN NAMED MITCH CARR, OF MITCH?S AUTO SERVICE IN KENSINGTON MARYLAND. AS YOU MAY BE AWARE HE SPECIALIZES IN MERCEDES REPAIRS. HE EXPLAINED THAT YOU HAD FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE OF THIS PROBLEM; APPARENTLY EITHER YOU OR YOUR STAFF HAVE VISITED HIS SHOP TO SEE MERCEDES VEHICLES WITH THIS PROBLEM. MARK SLIMP, [email protected] *TR

NHTSA ID
10202543
Incident
Sep 10, 2007
Mileage
80,000 mi
Suspension
Filed Sep 8, 2007

ON A 1997 MERCEDES E300D, THE RIGHT FRONT SPRING PERCH IS CORRODING CONSISTENT WITH THE MANNER DESCRIBED IN COMPLAINT PE07021. *JB

NHTSA ID
10202261
Incident
Sep 7, 2007
Mileage
200,750 mi
Brakes
Filed Feb 6, 2007

SOCKET DEFORMS THERMALLY CAUSING REAR BRAKE LIGHT NOT TO ILLUMINATE. PROBLEM IS ON MY 1997 MERCEDES E300 DIESEL VIN# [XXX]. EXACT SAME PROBLEM WAS RECALLED ON 98-2004 SLK-CLASS BUT NOT ON MODEL. RECALL # FOR SLK IS 2006-080005. THANKS. *NM UPDATED 07/11/2012 *JS INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)

NHTSA ID
10181771
Incident
Dec 30, 2006
Mileage
90,000 mi
Body & structure
Filed Nov 22, 2006

SPRING PERCHES ON THE FRONT SUSPENSION HAS RUSTED AND ARE FALLING APART. THIS IS A SERIOUS SAFETY THREAT AND IF THE PERCHES BREAK WHILE DRIVING, PEOPLE CAN GET KILLED. LOCAL MERCEDES DEALERSHIP IS REFUSING TO REPAIR OR EVEN INSPECT THE PROBLEM AND IS TELLING ME THERE IS NOTHING THEY CAN DO. RUST ON THE FRAME WELD IN ANY CAR IS NOT ACCEPTABLE, I AM DEEPLY DISAPPOINTED BY THE LACK OF QUALITY AND LACK OF SUPPORT FROM MERCEDES-BENZ!!!*JB

NHTSA ID
10174087
Incident
Nov 20, 2006
Suspension
Filed Oct 11, 2006

DRIVING STRAIGHT AT ABOUT 25 MPH WHEN THE LEFT FRONT SPRING PERCH BROKE. I WAS ABLE TO STOP CAR WITH NO INJURY OR DAMAGE TO THE CAR. *NM

NHTSA ID
10170549
Incident
Jul 27, 2006
Mileage
129,600 mi
Suspension
Filed Sep 5, 2006

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 55 MPH ON NORMAL ROAD CONDITIONS, THE VEHICLE'S FRONT END STARTED SHAKING. THE PROBLEM WAS GETTING WORST. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN INDEPENDENT REPAIR SHOP FOR INSPECTION WHO NOTIFIED THE PERCH, WHICH SUPPORTED THE COILS SPRINGS, WERE SEPARATED FROM THE STRUCTURE. THE MANUFACTURER REFERRED THE CONTACT TO A DEALERSHIP WHO ACKNOWLEDGED THE DEFECT AND NOTIFIED THE COST WOULD BE COVERED BY THE CONTACT.

NHTSA ID
10167390
Incident
Jan 15, 2006
Mileage
78,000 mi
Visibility
Filed Jul 10, 2006

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THAT ON SEVERAL OCCASIONS, WHEN THE REAR PASSENGER WINDOW WAS OPENED, THERE WAS A RATTLING SOUND, AND A SOUND OF GLASS BREAKING. AFTER THESE INCIDENCES THE WINDOW WAS VERY DIFFICULT TO CLOSE, EVEN THOUGH THE WINDOW MOTOR WAS STILL FUNCTIONING. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A SERVICE DEALER WHERE IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE WINDOW REGULATOR HAD FAILED, AND WAS SUBSEQUENTLY REPLACED.

NHTSA ID
10161970
Incident
Jul 9, 2006
Mileage
62,000 mi
Suspension
Filed Mar 13, 2006

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE THE VEHICLE WAS PARKED IN THE GARAGE, THE FRONT PASSENGER SIDE COIL SPRING FELL OFF. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN SEEN BY A MECHANIC.

NHTSA ID
10152568
Incident
Mar 13, 2006
Mileage
79,000 mi
Suspension
Filed Jan 26, 2006

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THE VEHICLE WAS MAKING A NOISE IN THE FRONT END. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE CONTACT'S REPAIR SHOP AND DETERMINED THE UPPER SPRING SUPPORT ON THE DRIVER'S SIDE BROKE. THE CONTACT WELDED IN A NEW UPPER SPRING SUPPORT.

NHTSA ID
10148764
Incident
Jan 21, 2006
Mileage
115,200 mi
Suspension
Filed Oct 25, 2005

WHILE DRIVING AT 35 MPH DOWN A SMALL HILL THE FRONT PASSENGER SPRING MOUNT (PERCH) ON MY 1997 E 300 DIESEL (W210) BROKE OFF CAUSING THE COIL SPRING TO FALL OFF OF THE CAR. THIS WAS AN UNBELIEVABLY DANGEROUS OCCURRANCE AND LUCKILY IT DID NOT HAPPEN WHEN I WAS GOING 65 MPH. I HAVE BROUGHT THE CAR MY AUTOBODY SHOP AND WE ARE STILL WORKING ON WHO WILL COVER THE COST OF MY REPAIRS (INSURANCE OR MB)

NHTSA ID
10140792
Incident
Oct 24, 2005
Mileage
77,635 mi
Suspension
Filed Sep 29, 2005

DT: THE CONSUMER FOUND OUT THIS MORNING THAT THE SPRING HOUSING WAS CORRODED. THE FRONT COIL SPRING HOUSING CORRODED AND BROKE AWAY FROM THE BODY ON FRONT PASSENGER'S SIDE. THIS WAS DISCOVERED BY THE CONSUMER WHILE HE WAS ROTATING HIS TIRES. HE FELT THE SPRING COULD COME OUT AND CAUSE THE LOSS OF VEHICLE CONTROL. THERE HAS BEEN NO REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT AT THIS TIME. THE CONSUMER PLANNED TO CONTACT THE DEALER THIS AFTERNOON. THERE WERE OTHER COMPLAINTS LISTED ON THE NHTSA WEBSITE AND OTHER WEBSITES AS WELL. THE MERCEDES OWNER WEBSITE HAD A NUMBER OF COMPLAINTS LISTED. THE VEHICLE IS AN E420. THE CHASSIS NUMBER W210.*AK

NHTSA ID
10138106
Incident
Sep 29, 2004
Mileage
104,000 mi
Suspension
Filed Sep 26, 2005

SPRING PERCH IS CHEAPLY WELDED TO THE WHEEL WELL ON THE MERCEDES 210 CHASSIS (1997 E420). ALL OTHER CARDS HAVE IT ATTACHED TO A SOLID BAR. MERCEDES WELDED IT TO VERY THIN SHEET METAL WHICH MERCEDES KNOWS HAS BEEN FAILING AT AN ALARMING RATE (DEALER ADMITTED THIS TO ME - THEY SEE THIS PROBLEM EVERY WEEK). 18 INCH LONG SUSPENSION SPRING POPPED OUT OF MY CAR WHILE MOVING. I COULD HAVE BEEN KILLED AS CAR IS UNCONTROLLABLE AFTER SUSPENSION GIVES OUT. INEXCUSABLE DESIGN FLAW THAT MERCEDES KNOWS IS A DAILY PROBLEM FOR ANYONE WITH THE 210 CHASSIS (AND THE HEAVIER ENGINES (420, 430 ETC.) WHERE THERE IS ADDITIONAL WEIGHT ON THE FRONT SUSPENSION). SERVICE REP AT DEALER EVEN TOLD ME THAT HE HAS SEEN IT HAPPEN ON THE HIGHWAY AND KNEW EXACTLY WHAT WAS GOING ON B/C HE SEES IT SO OFTEN. LUCKILY, THE CAR HE WITNESSED WAS ABLE TO GET TO THE BREAK-DOWN LANE/SHOULDER FOR SAFETY. THIS IS A POTENTIALLY DEADLY FAILURE OF THE SUSPENSION ON THE MERCEDES 210 CHASSIS. *NM

NHTSA ID
10137699
Incident
Sep 21, 2005
Mileage
100,100 mi
Suspension
Filed Apr 7, 2005

LOUD POP AND CAR BECAME DIFFICULT TO DRIVE. FRONT SPRING SUPPORT (PERCH) CAME LOOSE FROM THE FRAME RAIL. FRONT SUSPENSION WAS REMOVED, NEW SUPPORT WAS WELDED TO THE FRAME AND SUSPENSION REPLACED. AFTER READING OWNERS FORUMS ON THE INTERNET, IT HAS BECOME QUITE OBVIOUS THAT MANY MERCEDES BENZ W210 CHASSIS CARS (E CLASS) HAVE HAD THIS PROBLEM. APPARENTLY IT HAS TO DO WITH A SEALANT FAILING THAT ALLOWS WATER TO SIT IN THE JOINT WHERE THE SUPPORT IS WELDED TO THE FRAME.*AK

NHTSA ID
10116579
Incident
Mar 17, 2005
Mileage
57,000 mi
Suspension
Filed Dec 1, 2004

LEFT FRONT SPRING MOUNT FAILED WHILE CAR BEING DRIVEN APPROX. 45 MPH FAILURE DUE TO POOR WELD. DEALER REIMBURSED ONLY 50% OF COST. THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 14 OF THESE SAME FAILURES ON YOUR SITE. PLEASE INVESTIGATE.*AK

NHTSA ID
10100886
Incident
Aug 26, 2004
Mileage
80,000 mi
Body & structureSuspension
Filed Sep 10, 2004

REMOVED LEFT FRONT WHEEL AND FOUND UPPER SUSPENSION SPRING PERCH BREAKING AWAY FROM BODY, COULD SEE POSSIBLE LOSS OF STEERING. NO INCIDENT YET BUT AN ACCIDENT AVOIDED. DEALER HAS THIS PARTICULAR PART IN STOCK AND ASKED IF IT HAD COME APART "YET" BECAUSE THEY HAD SEEN IT BEFORE.*AK

NHTSA ID
10090763
Incident
Sep 10, 2004
Visibility
Filed Mar 28, 2004

I HAVE HAD TO REPLACE THE REAR WINDOW REGULATOR ASSEMBLIES 4 TIMES. TWICE ON THE PASSENGER REAR & TWICE ON THE DRIVERS SIDE REAR WINDOW. KEY PIECES LIKE PULLEYS AND THE ACTUAL PARTS THAT SUPPORT THE WEIGHT OF THE GLASS, IN THESE ASSEMBLIES ARE MADE WITH CHEAP PLASTIC COMPONENTS THAT BREAK UNDER NORMAL USE. ALSO THE MOTORS DO NOT AUTOMATICALLY SHUT OFF OR STOP WHEN THE WINDOW IS ALL THE WAY UP OR DOWN, AND CAN CAUSE STRESS THAT IS SUFFICIENT TO BREAK THE PLASTIC COMPONENTS AND DAMAGE THE DEVICE. THE REGULATORS ARE SOLD AS ONE WITH THE MOTOR AND CAN COST $165.00- $300.00.. CONSUMER INSTALLATION OF REPLACEMENT REGULATORS IS DIFFICULT DUE TO RIVETS HOLDING UNITS IN PLACE.. THUS CAUSING LABOR CHARGES OF 100.00+ FOR REPAIRS. *JB

NHTSA ID
10064034
Incident
Mar 1, 2004
Mileage
49,000 mi
Interior & seats
Filed Jan 22, 2004

THE SEAT TRACK FOR THE CAR CONTINUES TO BE DEFECTIVE. CAR SEAT "ROCKS" EXCESSIVELY - CAUSING SIGNIFICANT DISTRACTION IN HEAVY/EMERGENCY BRAKING. THE FRONT SEAT TRACK WAS REPLACED ONCE UNDER WARRANTY. THIS IS A FREQUENT PROBLEM WITH THIS MODEL CAR (1996-2003). MANUFACTURER SHOULD BE ASKED TO REPLACE OR REPAIR THE SEAT TRACKS TO ALLOW DRIVERS TO MAINTAIN CONTROL IN CRITICAL SITUATIONS.

NHTSA ID
10054661
Incident
Nov 1, 2003
Suspension
Filed Oct 29, 2003

I AM A MERCEDES BENZ TECHNICIAN OF 20 YEARS EXPERIENCE AND HAVE BECOME AWARE OF AN OUTRAGEOUSLY DANGEROUS SITUATION THAT NEEDS IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION. ON CERTAIN MODELS OF MERCEDES BENZ "210" BODIES THE SUPPORT THAT HOLDS THE UPPER PORTION OF THE COIL SPRING IN PLACE IS RUSTING OFF OF THE FRAME. IF IT BREAKS ALL OF THE WAY THE ENTIRE FRONT SUSPENSION WILL COLLAPSE. IT IS ONLY HAPPENING TO THE RIGHT FROM AND NOT THE LEFT BELIEF IS AN IMPROPER WELD OR DEFECTIVE METAL IN THE MOUNT ITSELF. MY UNDERSTANDING IS THAT IT EFFECTS 96-98 CARS SO FAR. THE DEALERS ARE NOT COVERING THIS UNDER WARRANTY. YOU CAN CONFIRM HOW MANY CARS ARE BEING AFFECTED BY SIMPLY ASKING MERCEDES HOW MANY OF THE RIGHT SIDE SUPPORTS THEY HAVE SOLD IN THE LAST 18 MONTHS AS OPPOSED TO THE LEFT SIDE. MY GUESS IS THAT IT WILL BE BETTER THAN A 100 TO 1 RATIO ONLY TIME A PART LIKE THIS SHOULD EVER NEED REPLACEMENT IS ACCIDENT DAMAGE. THEY ARE TELLING CUSTOMERS THAT THEY MUST HAVE HIT A POTHOLE AND SO YOU WILL MOST LIKELY NOT GET MANY CONSUMER COMPLAINTS DO NOT KNOW WHAT IT TAKES TO TRIGGER AN INVESTIGATION BUT I HOPE THAT MY YEARS OF EXCLUSIVE MB EXPERIENCE WILL CARRY AT LEAST SOME WEIGHT TO CONSIDER THE COMPLAINT AS WORTH A PHONE CALL TO MERCEDES ABOUT THE NUMBER OF MOUNTS THEY HAVE SOLD.I AM HAPPY TO TALK TO YOU BUT NEED TO BE PROTECTED FROM REPERCUSSIONS FROM MERCEDES FOR OBVIOUS REASONS. IF YOU NEED AN ACTUAL CAR LET ME KNOW AND I WILL SUPPLY YOU WITH THAT INFO RMATION. *AK

NHTSA ID
10043901
Incident
Oct 20, 2003
Mileage
90,000 mi

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Narrow this down by component

Categories with enough reports to have a page of their own

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .