RoadVitals

2001 National Rv Surfside Problems

Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component

Data refreshed

Owner complaintsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
2
Latest Apr 7, 2017
Components namedHow many of our component categories appear on at least one report for this model year. One report can name several.
1
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0

What this page shows

Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 2001 National Rv Surfside, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Reports by component

Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category

  • Brakes1100.0%

Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.

Each component in detail

What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words

Brakes

Reports naming service brakes, the antilock braking system, brake hoses, master cylinders or the parking brake.

1
report

From owner reports, verbatim

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 NATIONAL SURFSIDE RV. THE VEHICLE WAS EQUIPPED WITH A WORKHORSE CHASSIS. WHILE THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY BETWEEN 55-60 MPH, THERE WAS FAILURE WITH THE REAR BRAKE LINE THAT RESULTED TO COMPLETE LOSS OF THE FRONT AND REAR BRAKES. THE FAILURE WAS CONTRIBUTED TO EXCESSIVE RUST. THE CONTACT DOWNSHIFTED INTO FIRST GEAR AND THE SPEED REDUCED CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO STOP. THE VEHICLE WAS DRIVEN WITH CAUTION TO A NEARBY INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHERE THE REAR BRAKE LINE WAS REPLACED. THERE WAS NO WARNING LIGHT INDICATOR ILLUMINATED ON THE INSTRUMENT PANEL. THERE WAS A PRIOR RECALL REPAIR PERFORMED ON THE VEHICLE IN JANUARY OF 2004. THE NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER WAS 03V059000 (SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC: SWITCHES: BRAKE WARNING). THE CONTACT STATED THE RECALL REMEDY REPAIR WAS INSUFFICIENT. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 40,500. UPDATED 11/15/10 *CN THE CONSUMER WAS INFORMED THAT WHEN THE RECALL WAS DONE, THE MECHANIC DID NOT CONNECT THE WIRES TO THE BULB CORRECTLY. THERE WAS A GAP IN THE CONNECTOR THAT GROUNDED AND BLEW OUT THE BULB. THUS, THERE WAS NO WARNING WHEN THE FLUID LEAKED OUT. THE MASTER CYLINDER ON THE FORD CHASSIS WAS BOLTED TO THE FIRE WALL AT AN ANGLE. WHEN THE REAR LINE RUSTED OUT AND BLEW, THE FLUID LEAKED OUT THE FRONT OF THE MASTER CYLINDER. IN AUGUST 2007, A REAR BRAKE PAD HAD RUSTED AND FALLEN OFF WHILE PARKED IN THE DRIVEWAY. ALL THE BRAKE PADS WERE REPLACED. UPDATED 11/24/10

NHTSA ID 10334558 · filed Jun 4, 2010

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Elsewhere on this vehicle

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .