RoadVitals

2014 Shasta Flite Problems

Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component

Data refreshed

Owner complaintsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
1
Latest Nov 16, 2016
Components namedHow many of our component categories appear on at least one report for this model year. One report can name several.
1
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0

What this page shows

Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 2014 Shasta Flite, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Reports by component

Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category

  • Body & structure1100.0%

Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.

Each component in detail

What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words

Body & structure

Reports naming the vehicle structure, frame, body panels, doors, hood and trim.

1
report

From owner reports, verbatim

I PURCHASED A NEW 2014 SHASTA FRST IN FALL OF 2013 FROM CAMPING WORLD IN EDMOND OKLAHOMA, VIN [XXX]. I DISCOVERED MAJOR DELAMINATION ON THE REAR OF MY CAMPER ON 6 OCTOBER 2016. I IMMEDIATELY CONTACTED SHASTA TO REPORT THE PROBLEM. [XXX]. INSTRUCTED ME TO TAKE THE UNIT TO THE DEALERSHIP FOR INSPECTION AND TO TAKE PICTURES OF THE UNIT TO SEND TO SHASTA, WHICH I DID. CAMPING WORLD INSPECTED THE UNIT AND SENT PICTURES TO [XXX]. . . STATED INITIALLY THE UNIT WAS NOT WARRANTIED AND SHASTA COULD NOT ASSIST AS THE ROOF SEALS WERE THE CAUSE OF THE DELAMINATION. IT WAS DETERMINED BY THE CAMPING WORD FACTORY AUTHORIZED AND CERTIFIED PAINT AND BODY TECHNICIAN THAT THE DELAMINATION WAS CAUSED BY INTERNAL STRUCTURAL FAILURE OF THE FILON, NOT ROOF SEALS OR ANY OTHER EXTERNAL FACTORS [XXX]. STATED THEN STATED HE HAD "GONE TO MANAGEMENT" AND SHASTA WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO ASSIST IN THE REPAIR DUE TO ?LACK OF MAINTENANCE AND THE UNIT IS 2 YEARS PAST THE WARRANTY?. I THEN REMINDED [XXX]. THAT THE INSPECTION OF THE ROOF SEALS (AKA MAINTENANCE) WOULD NOT HAVE DETECTED THE INTERNAL STRUCTURAL FAILURE OF THE FILON I BELIEVE THERE IS A STRUCTURAL FACTORY DEFECT IN THIS CAMPER MODEL WORTHY OF A FULL FACTORY RECALL AND INVESTIGATION BY THE NHTSA. FURTHERMORE, I BELIEVE THIS MODEL YEAR TO BE A REAL AND DISTINCT DANGER TO THE PUBLIC UNTIL A FULL INVESTIGATION OF THE FACTORY STRUCTURAL FAILURE IS COMPLETE. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR

NHTSA ID 10926350 · filed Nov 16, 2016

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Elsewhere on this vehicle

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .