RoadVitals

2004 Thor California Tahoe 36WTB Problems

Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component

Data refreshed

Owner complaintsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
2
Latest Sep 11, 2006
Components namedHow many of our component categories appear on at least one report for this model year. One report can name several.
2
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0

What this page shows

Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 2004 Thor California Tahoe 36WTB, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Reports by component

Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category

  • Powertrain (other)150.0%
  • Tires & wheels150.0%

Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.

Each component in detail

What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words

Powertrain (other)

Powertrain reports that are not specifically the engine or transmission — driveshafts, axles, transfer cases and differentials.

1
report

From owner reports, verbatim

2004 THOR TAHOE RECALL NOTICE REGARDING A PROBLEM WITH THE DEXTER AXLE. *MR THE CONSUMER CALLED THE DEXTER AXLE COMPANY AND GAVE THEM THE SERIAL NUMBER. DEXTER AXLE COMPANY COMFIRMED THAT THE DUAL AXLE OF THIS RV WAS RATED 6000 LBS. PER AXLE. THE CONSUMER THEN CALLED CARLISLE TIRE COMPANY WHO CONFIRMED THAT THE LT235/85R16, LOAD RANGE E TIRE HAVE A MAX LOAD PER TIRE OF 3042. THE CONSUMER RECENTLY HAD TWO BLOWOUTS OF THESE TIRES WITH LESS THAN 3000 MILES ON THEM. THE CONSUMER FEELS THAT THIS RV HAS SOME DESIGN FLAWS AND IS UNSAFE TO DRIVE ON THE ROAD (THOR CALIFORNIA RECALL CAMPAIGN NO. 150030). *NM

NHTSA ID 10135597 · filed Aug 30, 2005

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Tires & wheels

Reports naming tires, wheels, hubs, or the tire-pressure monitoring system.

1
report

From owner reports, verbatim

I HAVE HAD 3 CARLISLE TIRE FAILURES ON MY 2004 TAHOE TRANSPORT BY THOR TRAVEL TRAILER. THE VIN IS [XXX]. THE FIRST FAILURE CAUSED DAMAGE TO THE TIRE & TRAILER IN 2005 (MARKED UP SIDE OF CAMPER, DESTROYED TIRE, DAMAGED/BENT FRAME, TORE UP UNDERBODY SEALING MATERIAL) TRAVELING SOUTH OF I-25 SOUTH OF COLORADO SPRINGS, CO ON OUR WAY HOME TO [XXX]. SINCE THEN, I HAVE FOUND 2 OTHER TIRES FAIL BY HAVING A BELT BREAK IN THE TREAD CAUSING A LARGE "BUBBLE". LUCKILY, I HAVE FOUND THESE FAILED TIRES PRIOR TO ANY BLOWOUT OR ACCIDENT. I NOTIFIED THE MANUFACTURER OF ALL 3 FAILURES & ASKED FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE ON THE LAST 2 FAILURES. I SENT THEM THE TIRES PER THEIR REQUEST BUT AFTER THEIR INSPECTION THEY HAVE DENIED ANY OUT OF WARRANTY GOODWILL DUE TO "OUT OF WARRANTY" & "TIRE SHOWS SIGNS OF BEING UNDERINFLATED AND OVER LOADED" ON ONE TIRE & THE OTHER "OUT OF WARRANTY" & "TIRE SHOWS SIGNS OF BEING UNDERINFLATED OR MISALIGNMENT". I AGREE THAT THEY ARE OUT OF WARRANTY & NEW THAT WHEN I CALLED THEM. I DO NOT AGREE WITH THEM STATING THAT THE TIRES WERE EITHER UNDERINFLATED, OVERLOADED OR OUT OF ALIGNMENT. THE TIRES WERE USED AT THE RECOMMENDED PRESSURE ON THE SIDEWALL AND WELL BELOW THE TOTAL VEHICLE GVW AS PROVIDED BY THE TRAILER MANUFACTURER. FURTHERMORE, THERE ARE NOT ADJUSTMENTS THAT CAN BE MADE FOR ALIGNMENTS ON A TRAVEL TRAILER (CASTER, CAMBER, NOR TOE). I AM NOT MAKING THIS COMPLAINT SIMPLY BECAUSE THEY DENIED ANY COST ASSISTANCE - I HAD ALREADY PURCHASED 2 NEW TIRES WHEN I CONTACTED THEM. I WILL BE PURCHASING A 3RD NEW ONE THIS WEEK. I AM MAKING THIS SIMPLY BECAUSE I HAVE HAD 3 OUT OF 4 TIRES FAIL IN SIMILAR MANNERS ON A TRAILER WITH LESS THAN 7,500 MILES ON THE FACTORY EQUIPPED TIRES. I ALSO HAVE CHECKED THE TIRE PRESSURES & ADJUSTED TO THE MAXIMUM (FOR A LOADED TOYHAULER TRAVEL TRAILER) BEFORE EACH TRIP. I WAS LUCKY TO HAVE SPOTTED 2 OF THE 3 FAILURES PRIOR TO ANY ACCIDENT OR DAMAGE. CARLISLE RMA #S [XXX]. *NM UPDATED 07/12/2012 *JS

NHTSA ID 10167916 · filed Sep 11, 2006

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Elsewhere on this vehicle

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .