Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Our database contains 2 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2006 Twist N Go Milano ML151, most frequently naming the body & structure category. 1 safety recall has been issued covering this model year; and 1 NHTSA investigation names it.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
When owners filed reports about this model year
Not enough dated records to plot a meaningful trend — 1 month of data.
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
1 campaign cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govSTRUCTURE:FRAME AND MEMBERS:UNDERBODY SHIELDS
NHTSA inquiries naming this vehicle. An investigation is not a finding of a defect.
REAR WHEEL LOCKUP
AFTER RECEIVING TWO ALLEGATIONS OF REAR INNER FENDER SEPARATION FROM OWNERS OF MY 2006, CMSI MANUFACTURED, TWIST N GO BRAND MILANO 151 MODEL SCOOTERS, ODI OPENED THIS PE.WE SUBSEQUENTLY MET WITH THE OWNERS AND THEIR DEALER AND VISITED WITH CMSI.DURING OUR VISIT, CMSI DECIDED TO RECALL THE SUBJECT VEHICLES TO CORRECT THE REAR INNER FENDER SEPARATION ISSUE.WITH THAT DECISION, THIS PE IS CLOSED.
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
ON 7-23-06 MY WIFE WAS DRIVING HER NEW 2006 TNG MILANO SCOOTER IN WHICH SHE LOST CONTROL BECAUSE THE REAR FENDER BROKE OFF AND BECAME CAUGHT IN THE TIRE ROTATION. SHE WAS FORCED TO SWERVE OUT OF TRAFFIC AND COME TO A QUICK STOP, CAUSING THE BIKE TO CRASH ON TOP OF HER. THE DEALER, SCOOTER STATION, INSPECTED THE BIKE ON 7-25-06 AND DETERMINED THAT THE REAR FENDER WAS FLAWED. THE DEALER STATED THAT THE FLAW WOULD BE REPORTED TO CMSI.*AK ON 8-17-06 I WAS DRIVING MY TNG MILANO SCOOTER IN WHICH I LOST CONTROL BECAUSE THE REAR FENDER BROKE OFF AND BECAME CAUGHT IN THE TIRE ROTATION. I WAS FORCED TO SWERVE OUT OF TRAFFIC AND COME TO A QUICK STOP IN WHICH MY SCOOTER AND I CRASHED. THE DEALER WAS CONTACTED IMMEDIATELY TO REPORT THIS SECOND FENDER FAILURE. AGAIN THE DEALER CONFIRMED THAT THIS WAS A DESIGN FLAW. WE WERE INSTRUCTED TO CONTACT CMSI DIRECTLY TO DEAL WITH THE ISSUE. ON 8-24-06 WE SENT A CERTIFIED LETTER (WITH PHOTO DOCUMENTATION OF THE SCOOTER DAMAGE) TO CMSI REQUESTING A FULL REFUND FOR THE TWO TNG MILANO SCOOTERS. A REPAIR OR REPLACEMENTS APPROACH WOULD NOT ADDRESS THE REAR FENDER DESIGN FLAW. THESE OPTIONS WOULD NOT PREVENT US FROM BEING PLACED AT SERIOUS RISK WHILE DRIVING THE SCOOTERS IN THE FUTURE. WE RECEIVED NO RESPONSE. WE MADE FURTHER DOCUMENTED ATTEMPTS AT CONTACTING CMSI BETWEEN 8-24-06 AND 10-6-06 AND RECEIVED NO RESPONSE. ON 10-9-06 WE LET THEM KNOW THAT IF NO RESPONSE WAS PROVIDED THAT DAY WE WOULD TAKE THE NEXT STEPS IN PURSUING OUR RIGHTS. CMSI RESPONDED BY TELLING US THAT THE PROBLEM NEEDED TO BE TAKEN UP WITH THE DEALER NOT THEM. FINALLY ON 10-10-06 WE RECEIVED AN EMAIL FROM CMSI STATING THAT THEY WOULD FIX OR REPLACE THE SCOOTERS. I EMAILED CMSI IMMEDIATELY ASKING THEM IF THEY HAD REDESIGNED THE REAR FENDER. WE RECEIVED NO RESPONSE. MY WIFE AND I WERE BOTH SEPARATELY PLACED AT SERIOUS RISK. A REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT APPROACH CAN NOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM. *NM
ON 7-23-06 I WAS DRIVING MY NEW 2006 TNG MILANO SCOOTER IN WHICH I LOST CONTROL BECAUSE THE REAR FENDER BROKE OFF AND BECAME CAUGHT IN THE TIRE ROTATION. I WAS FORCED TO SWERVE OUT OF TRAFFIC AND COME TO A QUICK STOP, CAUSING THE BIKE TO CRASH ON TOP OF ME. THE DEALER, SCOOTER STATION, INSPECTED THE BIKE ON 7-25-06 AND DETERMINED THAT THE REAR FENDER WAS FLAWED. THE DEALER STATED THAT THE FLAW WOULD BE REPORTED TO CMSI. ON 8-17-06 MY HUSBAND WAS DRIVING HIS TNG MILANO SCOOTER IN WHICH HE LOST CONTROL BECAUSE THE REAR FENDER BROKE OFF AND BECAME CAUGHT IN THE TIRE ROTATION. HE WAS FORCED TO SWERVE OUT OF TRAFFIC AND COME TO A QUICK STOP IN WHICH HE AND HIS SCOOTER CRASHED. THE DEALER WAS CONTACTED IMMEDIATELY TO REPORT THIS SECOND FENDER FAILURE. AGAIN THE DEALER CONFIRMED THAT THIS WAS A DESIGN FLAW. WE WERE INSTRUCTED TO CONTACT CMSI DIRECTLY TO DEAL WITH THE ISSUE. ON 8-24-06 WE SENT A CERTIFIED LETTER (WITH PHOTO DOCUMENTATION OF THE SCOOTER DAMAGE) TO CMSI REQUESTING A FULL REFUND FOR THE TWO TNG MILANO SCOOTERS. WE EXPLAINED THAT OFFERING US SCOOTER REPAIRS OR REPLACEMENTS WOULD NOT ADEQUATELY ADDRESS THE REAR FENDER DESIGN FLAW BECAUSE THESE OPTIONS WOULD NOT PREVENT US FROM BEING PLACED AT SERIOUS RISK WHILE DRIVING THE SCOOTERS IN THE FUTURE. WE RECEIVED NO RESPONSE. WE MADE FURTHER DOCUMENTED ATTEMPTS AT CONTACTING CMSI BETWEEN 8-24-06 AND 10-6-06 AND RECEIVED NO RESPONSE. ON 10-9-06 WE LET THEM KNOW THAT IF NO RESPONSE WAS PROVIDED THAT DAY WE WOULD TAKE THE NEXT STEPS IN PURSUING OUR RIGHTS. CMSI RESPONDED BY TELLING US THAT THE PROBLEM NEEDED TO BE TAKEN UP WITH THE DEALER NOT THEM. FINALLY ON 10-10-06 WE RECEIVED AN EMAIL FROM CMSI STATING THAT THEY WOULD FIX OR REPLACE THE SCOOTERS. I EMAILED CMSI IMMEDIATELY ASKING THEM IF THEY HAD REDESIGNED THE REAR FENDER. WE RECEIVED NO RESPONSE. MY HUSBAND AND I WERE BOTH SEPARATELY PLACED AT SERIOUS RISK. A REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT APPROACH CAN NOT SOLVE THE PROBLEM. *NM