RoadVitals

2001 Workhorse W22 Problems

Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component

Data refreshed

Owner complaintsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
10
Latest Jul 22, 2013
Components namedHow many of our component categories appear on at least one report for this model year. One report can name several.
2
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
1

What this page shows

Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 2001 Workhorse W22, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Reports by component

Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category

Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.

Each component in detail

What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words

Brakes

Reports naming service brakes, the antilock braking system, brake hoses, master cylinders or the parking brake.

10
reports

From owner reports, verbatim

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 MONACO MONARCH EQUIPPED WITH A WORKHORSE W22 CHASSIS. THE CONTACT WAS DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 58 MPH AND APPLIED THE BRAKES, WHICH BEGAN TO PULSATE ABNORMALLY. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO AN AUTHORIZED DEALER WHERE THE FRONT BRAKE PADS, CALIPERS AND BOTH FRONT ROTORS WERE REPLACED. THE REPAIRS WERE MADE THREE SEPARATE TIMES. THE FAILURE PERSISTED AFTER EACH REPAIR WAS PERFORMED. THE CONTACT PLANNED TO REPLACE THE PASSENGER'S SIDE ROTOR HIMSELF. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE DEFECT. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 5,000.

NHTSA ID 10526214 · filed Jul 22, 2013

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2001 WORKHORSE W22 CHASSIS. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE BRAKES MALFUNCTIONED AND LOCKED WHILE HE WAS DRIVING WHICH CAUSED THE ABS SENSOR TO MELT. THE BRAKES WERE REPLACED TWICE BUT THE FAILURE CONTINUED TO OCCUR. THE CONTACT REFERENCED RECALL 09V110000 AND STATED THAT WHEN HE CALLED THE MANUFACTURER, HE WAS TOLD THAT REPAIRS WERE NOT SCHEDULED TO BE PERFORMED UNTIL OCTOBER 2010. HE WAS ALSO TOLD THAT IF THE PROBLEM OCCURRED AGAIN, HE SHOULD CONTINUE PUMPING THE BRAKE PEDAL TO ACTIVATE THE BRAKING SYSTEM. THE CONTACT FELT THAT IT WAS A SAFETY CONCERN WHICH COULD CAUSE A FIRE OR CRASH TO OCCUR. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS APPROXIMATELY 31,000. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS UNKNOWN.

NHTSA ID 10348199 · filed Aug 9, 2010
All 10 reports naming brakes

Suspension

Reports naming suspension components — springs, struts, shocks, control arms and related hardware.

1
report

From owner reports, verbatim

WE HAVE A 2001 DUTCHSTAR CLASS A MOTORHOME, BUILT ON WORKHORSE CHASSIS NUMBER 28321. I AM WRITING FOR A NUMBER OF REASONS. THE FIRST BEING THAT I AM REQUESTING INFORMATION ON POSSIBLE RECALLS THAT INCLUDE THIS UNIT. I UNDERSTAND THAT THERE ARE TWO CAMPAIGNS FOR THE 2001 WORKHORSE CHASSIS, NHTSA # 04V084000, HAVING TO DO WITH SERVICE BRAKES, HYDRAULIC AND # 01V317000, HAVING TO DO WITH SUSPENSION:REAR:SPRINGS:LEAF SPRING ASSEMBLY:U-BOLT, LEAF SPRING TO AXLE. I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHETHER OUR UNIT IS INCLUDED AND IF SO, WHY WE WERE NOT NOTIFIED. THE SECOND REASON I AM WRITING HAS TO DO WITH THE ABS BRAKE SENSORS ON THE FRONT WHEELS. IN OCTOBER OF 2003, WE HAD TO HAVE THE RIGHT BRAKE SENSOR REPLACED AFTER IT HAD BURNED UP WITH ONLY 13,523 MILES ON THE UNIT. ON JULY 6, 2004, BOTH FRONT ABS BRAKE SENSORS BURNED UP AND REQUIRED REPLACING WITH ONLY 16,367 MILES. LUCKILY, WE WERE TRAVELING AT A LOW SPEED AS THE LACK OF THE SENSORS APPARENTLY CAUSED BOTH FRONT BRAKES TO LOCK UP, WHICH COULD HAVE BEEN EXTREMELY DANGEROUS HAD WE BEEN TRAVELING ON THE HIGHWAY INSTEAD OF A CITY STREET. WHILE I REALIZE THAT THE UNIT IS OUT OF THE 3 YEAR WARRANTY, THIS APPEARS TO BE A MANUFACTURERS DEFECT WHEN THE SAME UNITS BURN UP WITHIN 3000 MILES. I HAVE ALSO SPOKEN TO A FRIEND THAT HAS A 2002 W22 CHASSIS AND SHE HAS HAD THE SAME PROBLEM, CAUSING HER TO REPLACE BOTH FRONT SENSORS. THESE SENSORS SHOULD BE DESIGNED TO LAST A LOT MORE THAN 16,000 MILES AND CERTAINLY MORE THAN 3,000 MILES. I FEEL THAT WORKHORSE SHOULD TAKE RESPONSIBILITY AND REIMBURSE US FOR THE COST ($365.35) OF THE REPLACEMENT OF BOTH ABS BRAKE SENSORS. *LA

NHTSA ID 10081001 · filed Jul 13, 2004

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Elsewhere on this vehicle

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .