RoadVitals

1999 Airstream Excella Problems

Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component

Data refreshed

Owner complaintsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
3
Latest Apr 25, 2014
Components namedHow many of our component categories appear on at least one report for this model year. One report can name several.
2
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0

What this page shows

Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 1999 Airstream Excella, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Reports by component

Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category

  • Tires & wheels266.7%
  • Other / unspecified133.3%

Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.

Each component in detail

What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words

Tires & wheels

Reports naming tires, wheels, hubs, or the tire-pressure monitoring system.

2
reports

From owner reports, verbatim

GREENBALL TOWMASTER TIRES, 53GB CHN 2512. SIX TIRES, PURCHASED NEW IN APRIL 2013 AND INSTALLED ON OUR 1999 AIRSTREAM EXCELLA, 34 FOOT MODEL. THE PREVIOUS TIRES REPLACED WERE GOODYEAR MARATHONS WHICH EXHIBITED NO DEFECTS AFTER 12000 MILES. REPLACEMENT WAS DONE AS A PRE-EMPTIVE ACTION BECAUSE OF MILEAGE OF MARATHONS AND THEIR 4 YEAR AGE. FAILURE OF THE GREENBALL TOWMASTERS BEGAN AFTER 5000 MILES ON THE CURBSIDE CENTER AXLE (PASSENGER). THIS TIRE WAS REPLACED BEFORE IT DAMAGED THE TRAILER. I WAS NOT REIMBURSED FOR THIS TIRE WHICH HAD CLEARLY FAILED INTERNALLY, NOT DUE TO ROAD HAZARD OR IMPACT. I HAVE PHOTOGRAPHIC EVIDENCE. ANOTHER TRIP TO DESTINATION 250 MILES AWAY WAS TAKEN ON MARCH 14. OUR RETURN ON MARCH 16, WE WERE FLAGGED DOWN BY A PASSING MOTORIST WHO INDICATED A POSSIBLE ISSUE WITH OUR TRAILER. WE SAFELY STOPPED AND FOUND THE TREAD HAD COMPLETELY DETACHED FROM THE TIRE, SEVERELY DAMAGING THE TRAILER. THE FAILED TIRE WAS RETURNED TO GREENBALL AND WE RECEIVED THEIR RULING THAT THE TIRE HAD A 'MANUFACTURING DEFECT' AND THEY WOULD REPAIR THE TRAILER DAMAGES BUT NOT REPLACE THE TIRE. THE REMAINING TIRES HAVE BEEN REPLACED WITH ANOTHER BRAND BECAUSE ON INSPECTION THEY WERE ALL BEGINNING TO HAVE SIMILAR FAILURES. THE TIRES WERE MAINTAINED AT 'RECOMMENDED PRESSURES' BY GREENBALL THROUGHOUT THE TIME I OWNED THEM. REMAINING TIRES WERE SENT TO GREENBALL FOR THEIR EVALUATION. GREENBALL HAS PAID FOR ALL TRANSPORTATION COSTS OF THE TIRES FOR INSPECTION. I AWAIT PAYMENT FOR THE INITIAL DAMAGE AND THEIR RULING ON CAUSE FOR THE CONDITION OF THE REMAINING TIRES RETURNED TO GREENBALL. I HAVE INDICATED I WANT REIMBURSEMENT FOR COST OF THE GREENBALL TIRES AS A POSSIBLE REMEDY. *TR

NHTSA ID 10584777 · filed Apr 25, 2014

TRAILER TIRES MANUFACTURED BY NANKANG ARE FAILING DUE TO TREAD SEPARATION. FIRST FAILURE OCCURRED 11/2009, SECOND FAILURE OCCURRED 4/2010. TIRES LESS THAN FOUR YEARS OLD WITH APPROXIMATELY 10-12,000 MILES. *TR

NHTSA ID 10324701 · filed Apr 9, 2010

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Other / unspecified

Reports whose component NHTSA recorded as unknown, or that do not map to one of the categories above.

1
report

From owner reports, verbatim

1999 AIRSTREAM EXCELLA. RECALL NOTICE ON DOMETIC RV REFRIGERATOR. CONSUMER WANTS TO KNOW WHY HIS CLAIM WAS DENIED. *NJ THE CONSUMER STATED THERE WAS LEAKAGE/STAINING AT THE REAR OF THE REFRIGERATOR, THERE WAS YELLOW RESIDUE ON THE SIDE OF THE REFRIGERATOR AND THERE WAS A SMELL OF AMMONIA AND THE REFRIGERATOR DID NOT COOL PROPERLY LIKE IT ONCE DID. THE CONSUMER WAS DENIED REIMBURSEMENT BECAUSE THE REPAIR OCCURRED LATER THAN MARCH 1, 2007. *JB

NHTSA ID 10243730 · filed Sep 26, 2008

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Elsewhere on this vehicle

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .