RoadVitals

2002 Coachmen Mirada Owner Complaints

Reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers, shown in full

Data refreshed

Complaints on fileComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
3
Latest Dec 6, 2007
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0
Filed in the last 12 monthsReports filed with NHTSA in the trailing 365 days. Recent volume reflects attention and vehicle age as much as anything else.
0
Reports on file since Aug 22, 2003

What this page shows

Our database holds 3 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2002 Coachmen Mirada. Each one is a report filed by an owner or driver and published by NHTSA without most of them being verified. A complaint is not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. Narratives are shown exactly as filed.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Complaints, most recent first

Showing 1–3 of 3

Driver assistance
Filed Dec 6, 2007

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2002 COACHMEN MIRADA. THE CONTACT RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE FOR THE VEHICLE SPEED CONTROL: CRUISE CONTROL IN 2006. HE STATED THAT FORD MOTOR COMPANY ISSUED RECALL NUMBER 05S28 FOR THE WIRING HARNESS. SINCE THE RECALL NOTICE WAS RECEIVED, THE PARTS ARE STILL UNAVAILABLE. THE CONTACT NOTIFIED VARIOUS DEALERS IN THE AREA AND THEY HAVE BEEN UNABLE TO INFORM HIM OF WHEN THE PARTS WILL ARRIVE. THE VEHICLE HAS NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THERE HAD BEEN NO FAILURE TO DATE. THE VIN AND ENGINE SIZE WERE UNKNOWN. THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 7,000.

NHTSA ID
10211001
Incident
Jul 15, 2006
Tires & wheels
Filed Dec 21, 2005

DT: THE CONTACT STATED THE INSIDE REAR DUAL TIRE BLEW OUT. THE ONLY WARNING WAS SEVERE VIBRATION BEFORE THE BLOWOUT OCCURRED. THERE WAS A 72 MONTH WARRANTY ON THE TIRES. THE DEALER AND THE MANUFACTURER REFUSED TO HONOR THE WARRANTY. THE TIRE WAS REPLACED AT THE CONTACT'S EXPENSE. HOWEVER, EVEN AFTER REPLACEMENT OF THE DAMAGED TIRE THE VEHICLE CONTINUED TO VIBRATE. *AK UPDATED 1/11/2006 - *NM

NHTSA ID
10145805
Incident
Oct 7, 2005
Mileage
22,000 mi
Tires & wheels
Filed Aug 22, 2003

GENERAL TIRE LMT 400, 225/70R 19.5 TWO SEPARATE INCIDENTS ON 2002 COACHMEN RV WITH FORD CHASSIS. FIRST ON INTERSTATE REAR INNER DUAL BLOWOUT SHOWING SIDEWALL ZIPPER OF APPROX 6 INCHES, TIRE HAD 13000 MILES ON JULY 17, 2003. SECOND INCIDENT ON IN TOWN ROADWAY BLOWOUT OF INNER DUAL SHOWING SIDEWALL ZIPPER PF APPROX 6 INCHES, TIRE HAD 500 MILES. NOTIFIED GENERAL OF BOTH INCIDENTS, FIRST INCIDENT TOOK TIRE TO GENERAL DEALER STATED WAS NOT FAULT OF TIRE BUT OF MOUTING OR UNDERINFLATION. TIRE SUBSEQUENTLY REPLACED BY FORD DEALER. FORD NOTIFIED WITH DETAILS. SECOND INCIDENT GENERAL NOTIFIED DIRECTED TO TAKE TIRE TO LOCAL FORD DEALER WHO WHEN CONTACTED STATED DEALERSHIP DID NOT HAVE FACILITIES FOR RVS REFUSED TO SET APPOINTMENT FOR REVIEW. BASED ON TWO INCIDENTS WITH SAME PROBLEM I HAVE SERIOUS CONCERN ABOUT DRIVING VEHICLE WHICH HAS SIX OF THESE TIRES UNTIL SOMEONE CAN EXPLAIN WHAT HAPPENED.*AK

NHTSA ID
10033340
Incident
Aug 20, 2003
Mileage
13,500 mi

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .