RoadVitals

2007 Dorel 22-515 (maxi Cosi Mico) Owner Complaints

Reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers, shown in full

Data refreshed

Complaints on fileComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
6
Latest Apr 6, 2017
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0
Filed in the last 12 monthsReports filed with NHTSA in the trailing 365 days. Recent volume reflects attention and vehicle age as much as anything else.
0
Reports on file since Feb 19, 2009

What this page shows

Our database holds 6 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2007 Dorel 22-515 (maxi Cosi Mico). Each one is a report filed by an owner or driver and published by NHTSA without most of them being verified. A complaint is not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. Narratives are shown exactly as filed.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Complaints, most recent first

Showing 1–6 of 6

Seat belts
Filed Apr 6, 2017

TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A DOREL MAXI COSI PRIA 85 (NA) CHILD SAFETY SEAT, MODEL NUMBER: CC156DXB. THE SEAT WAS MANUFACTURED ON DECEMBER 6, 2016. THE SAFETY SEAT WAS BEING UTILIZED IN A 2012 HONDA CR-V. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE MECHANISM THAT TIGHTENED THE STRAPS FAILED AND CAUSED THE STRAPS TO INDEPENDENTLY LOOSEN. THE FAILURE OCCURRED TWICE. THE MANUFACTURER WAS MADE AWARE OF THE ISSUE AND PROVIDED A NEW SEAT FREE OF CHARGE. THE PURCHASE DATE WAS UNKNOWN.

NHTSA ID
10970962
Incident
Mar 30, 2017
Seat belts
Filed Feb 16, 2017

CPSC:I TOOK OUR CAR SEAT COVER OFF TO WASH AND FOUND THAT ONE OF THE SAFETY HARNESS BELTS UNDERNEATH HAD BECOME COMPLETELY WORN SO THAT IT HAD SEVERED COMPLETELY. THIS CAR SEAT WAS BOUGHT IN JAN. 2015 AND SUPPOSED TO LAST UNTIL MY CHILD REACHES 70 POUNDS ( NEEDLESS TO SAY A LIFETIME PRODUCT ). NEVER BEEN IN AN ACCIDENT, NOTHING UNUSUAL.*BF SERIAL # L#5 B297403; MODEL PRIA 70 CC099-CKN

NHTSA ID
10955868
Incident
Jan 25, 2017
Seat belts
Filed Mar 14, 2015

DORAL MAXI-COSI PRIA 70 MODEL # CC099-APU MANUFACTURE DATE 05/08/2014. TIGHTENING PULL STRAP IS HARD TO ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO TIGHTEN MAKING IT A SAFETY ISSUE WHEN PLACING CHILD IN THE SEAT. EDGES OF STRAP ALSO ARE FRAYING WEAKENING THE OVERALL STRENGTH OF THE HARNESS. *TR

NHTSA ID
10694261
Incident
Mar 14, 2015
Seat belts
Filed Jul 31, 2009

COSCO DREAMRIDE CARBED MANUFACTURED 8/7/07 MODEL NUMBER 22022FSM PARENTS OF 4LB 15 OZ INFANT GIVEN CARBED FROM HOSPITAL WHEN INFANT FAILED THE CAR SEAT CHALLENGE TEST. INFANT IS NOW 5 WEEKS OLD AND 7LBS. WAS RETESTED AND NOW CAN SAFELY RIDE IN AN INFANT REAR FACING CAR SEAT. DUE TO THE CLOTH STRAPS THAT YOU THREAD THE SEATBELT THRU IT IS NEARLY IMPOSSIBLE TO GET A TIGHT FIT SO THE CAR BED WON'T MOVE MORE THAN AN INCH ON THE BENCH SEAT OF THE BACK OF THE VEHICLE.ALSO IF A FAST STOP WAS MADE IT WOULD FORCE THE CARBED TO PUSH THE BABY UP AGAINST THE SEAT BACK OF THE VEHICLE. THIS CAN'T BE SAFE. THIS COUPLE WAS GIVEN THE DEAMRIDE BECAUSE SHE DIDNT SEEM TO FIT IN THE ANGEL RIDE CAR BED LENGTHWISE. THE ANGEL RIDE CAR BED HAS A HARD PLASTIC ON THE SIDE TO FIT THE SEAT BELT THRU AND ALSO A BELT ADJUSTER TO FIT AROUND THE SEATBELT TO HOLD THE CARBED SECURELY IN THE VEHICLE. *TR

NHTSA ID
10279013
Incident
Jun 17, 2009
Seat belts
Filed Jul 30, 2009

SEPARATE BASE PURCHASED FOR MICO INFANT SEAT WOULD NOT CLICK CAR SEAT ONTO BASE. UPON FURTHER INVESTIGATION AND COMPARISON WITH ANOTHER BASE, CONSUMER FOUND THAT THIS SEPARATE BASE WAS MISSING THE SPRINGS NEEDED TO WORK PROPERLY, THIS SEAT COME STRAIGHT FROM THE RETAILER. *NJ

NHTSA ID
10278948
Incident
May 1, 2009
Interior & seatsSeat belts
Filed Feb 19, 2009

AS A TECHNICIAN, I ATTEMPTED TO INSTALL THE ABOVE LISTED BASE INTO CAR. THE CARRIER WOULD NOT LOCK INTO BASE. I TESTED CARRIER WITH SECOND BASE MANUFACTURED ON A DIFFERENT DATE AND IT DID LOCK. THE ABOVE BASE IS FAULTY AND WILL BE RETURNED. BASE NEVER USED. BRAND NEW UPDATED 02-19-09 *BF UPDATED 02/19/09. *JB

NHTSA ID
10260088
Incident
Mar 12, 2008

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .