RoadVitals

2009 Keystone Fuzion Owner Complaints

Reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers, shown in full

Data refreshed

Complaints on fileComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
2
Latest Apr 30, 2014
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
1
Filed in the last 12 monthsReports filed with NHTSA in the trailing 365 days. Recent volume reflects attention and vehicle age as much as anything else.
0
Reports on file since Nov 23, 2010

What this page shows

Our database holds 2 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2009 Keystone Fuzion. Each one is a report filed by an owner or driver and published by NHTSA without most of them being verified. A complaint is not a confirmed defect, not a recall and not a manufacturer bulletin. Narratives are shown exactly as filed.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Complaints, most recent first

Showing 1–2 of 2

Electrical
Filed Apr 30, 2014
Fire reported

TL-THE CONTACT OWNS A 2009 KEYSTONE FUZION RV. THE CONTACT STATED THE VEHICLE WAS EQUIPPED WITH A STANDARD GENERATOR. THE TRANSFER SWITCH MODEL NUMBER WAS IOTA ITS-50R. THE TRANSFER SWITCH OVERHEATED WHICH CAUSED DAMAGE TO THE INTERNAL WIRES AND MELTED THE TRANSFER BOX. THERE WERE NO FLAMES VISIBLE. THERE WAS A RECALL RELATED TO THE FAILURE UNDER NHTSA CAMPAIGN ID NUMBER 11V577000 (ELECTRICAL SYSTEM), HOWEVER THE VIN WAS NOT INCLUDED. THE VEHICLE HAD NOT BEEN REPAIRED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOTIFIED OF THE DEFECT. THERE WAS NO MILEAGE. JS

NHTSA ID
10585655
Incident
Apr 25, 2014
Tires & wheels
Filed Nov 23, 2010

THIS LETTER BELOW IS THE LETTER I SENT TO CARLISLE TIRE COMP, AND THEIR RESPONSE TO ME WAS THEY NEED TO SEE THE ACTUAL TIRE TO DETERMINE IF IT WAS A TIRE FAILURE. THE TIRES LOOKED LIKE A RETREAD THE WAY THEY CAME APART AND SENT THEM THE PICTURES. I BOUGHT A FUZION 302 TOURING EDITION TOY HAULER IN OCTOBER 2008 (THE TIRES HAD 2008 ON THEM). I HAVE BEEN USING IT TO CAMP WITHIN 10 MILES OF MY HOME. I DECIDED TO TAKE A TRIP TO ARKANSAS IN MAY 2010. ON THE WAY HOME I HAD 2 BLOW OUTS AT THE SAME TIME. IN SEPTEMBER OF 2010, I WAS GOING TO A LAKE 2 HOURS FROM ME, I HAD ANOTHER BLOW OUT. I WOULD LIKE AN ANSWER AS TO WHY TIRES THAT HAVE LESS THAN 1200 MILES, LESS THAN TWO YEARS OLD CAN BLOW OUT SO BAD THAT IS CAUSES AN ESTIMATED OF 1258.00 OF DAMAGE TO MY FUZION. THE SERVICE MANAGER TOLD ME THAT THE TIRES FROM CARLISLE WERE BAD, HE SAID A RECALL HAD BEEN DONE, BUT I WAS NEVER NOTIFIED OF A RECALL. I HAVE HAD TO BUY 6 TOTAL NEW TIRES, 2 WITH THE FIRST BLOW OUT IN MAY, THAN I REPLACED 4 IN SEP. BECAUSE JIM'S TIRE CONVINCED ME IN TO PUTTING ALL 4 TIRES OF THE SAME MAKE BACK ON THE TRAILER SINCE I WAS ONLY HALF WAY TO MY DESTINATION. I WAS UNABLE TO SAVE THESE FAILED TIRES BECAUSE I HAD NO PLACE FOR STORING THEM, BUT I DID TAKE PICTURES OF THEM. *TR

NHTSA ID
10367296
Incident
May 3, 2010
Mileage
1,200 mi

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .