RoadVitals

2019 Peterbilt 567 Problems

Owner-reported complaints filed with NHTSA, grouped by component

Data refreshed

Owner complaintsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
1
Latest Apr 15, 2020
Components namedHow many of our component categories appear on at least one report for this model year. One report can name several.
1
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
0

What this page shows

Everything below is an owner-reported complaint submitted to NHTSA about the 2019 Peterbilt 567, grouped by the component NHTSA recorded on the report. These are not confirmed defects, and they are not recalls. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a category with more reports in it is not evidence that a part is defective.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

Reports by component

Ranked by how many owner reports name each component category

  • Powertrain (other)1100.0%

Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.

Each component in detail

What the reports in each category say, in the owners' own words

Powertrain (other)

Powertrain reports that are not specifically the engine or transmission — driveshafts, axles, transfer cases and differentials.

1
report

From owner reports, verbatim

OUR DRIVER WAS IN TOW WITH A VEHICLE WHEN HE STARTED EXPERIENCING ISSUES WITH SHIFTING BETWEEN GEARS, WE ADVISED HIM TO RETURN TO THE YARD TO SWAP TRUCKS AND COMPLETE THE CALL THIS WAS ON 3/23/2020. BEING SHORT HANDED DUE TO THE STAY AT HOME ORDER WE DOWNED THE TRUCK UNTIL WE HAD ENOUGH STAFFING TO DELIVER IT TO PETERBILT FOR INSPECTION AND REPAIRS WHICH TOOK PLACE ON 3/30/2020. WE RECEIVED A CALL FROM [XXX] @ COAST COUNTIES PETERBILT (SAN LEANDRO) ADVISING ME THAT MY TRUCK WAS 4 DAYS OVER THE ONE YEAR WARRANTY MARK WITH JUST 21,594 MILES ON THE TRUCK AND I PROVIDED ME WITH AN ESTIMATE TO CONTINUE WITH REPAIRS SEE WHAT WAS WRONG. I ADVISED BOTH [XXX] AND [XXX] (SERVICE MANAGER) THAT NHTSA ISSUED 2 RECALLS (18V-931) AND (18E-102) BOTH PERTAINING TO A FAILED CLUTCHES THAT WERE INSTALLED INTO ROUGHLY 35-75K TRUCKS WHICH INCLUDED MY CLUTCH WHICH MATCHED THE SERIAL NUMBER AFFECTED CLUTCH RANGE PROVIDED BY EATON AND NHTSA ON BOTH OF THE RECALLS NOTICES. I REACHED OUT TO PACCAR AND EATON WHICH BOTH AGREED TO COVER A PORTION OF THE REPAIRS LEAVING ME WITH ALMOST A 3K REPAIR BILL FOR A PART THAT WAS ON NATIONAL RECALL. COAST COUNTIES PETERBILT, PACCAR & EATON ACTED IN BAD FAITH BY DISMISSING BOTH RECALLS, FURTHER THEIR LACK OF QUALITY ASSURANCE RESULTED IN MY COMPANY SUSTAINING AN AVOIDABLE LOSS OF REVENUE INC TRUCK & INSURANCE PAYMENTS WE HAD TO MAKE FOR A TRUCK WE WERE NOT ABLE TO USE FOR OVER 3 WEEKS AND COULD HAVE RESULTED IN SOMEONE BEING SERIOUSLY HURT. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6). *TR

NHTSA ID 11321274 · filed Apr 15, 2020

Too few reports in this category for a page of its own — they appear in the full complaint list.

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers.

Elsewhere on this vehicle

Data sources

Data on this page last refreshed .