RoadVitals

2016 Mazda CX-9

Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data

Data refreshed

Owner complaintsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
108
+1 complaint in 30 days
Safety recallsA safety recall is issued when a manufacturer or NHTSA determines that a vehicle has a safety-related defect or does not comply with a federal motor vehicle safety standard. Recall repairs are free. Whether a specific vehicle is covered depends on its VIN — a recall listed for a model year does not necessarily apply to every vehicle of that year.
0
InvestigationsNHTSA opens an investigation to examine whether a safety defect may exist. An open investigation is not a determination that a defect exists, and many investigations close without a recall. Investigations can, however, lead to one.
0
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
4
3 injuries, 0 deaths reported

Overview

Our database contains 108 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2016 Mazda CX-9, most frequently naming the engine, electrical and brakes categories. 614 manufacturer communications are on file.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

What owners report

Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded

Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.

Safety recalls

No recalls in our database for this model year

That does not guarantee a specific vehicle is unaffected — recalls are issued against VINs, and new campaigns are announced regularly. Check a VIN on NHTSA.gov.

Recent owner complaints

Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words

Engine
Filed Oct 31, 2026

**NHTSA VEHICLE SAFETY COMPLAINT – ENGINE FAILURE AND UNAVAILABLE REPLACEMENT PART** I am filing this complaint regarding serious engine problems with my 2016 Mazda CX-9 equipped with the 2.5L SKYACTIV-G Turbo engine. My vehicle experienced significant engine problems, including overheating, diagnostic trouble codes P0014 (exhaust camshaft timing/VVT system performance) and P0303 (cylinder 3 misfire). Following diagnosis, the cylinder head was found to be cracked, requiring machining and replacement of the timing kit. Despite these extensive repairs and expenses, the vehicle continues to have unresolved engine problems, including rough idling. The vehicle has not been fully repaired because I cannot obtain the exhaust-side Variable Valve Timing (VVT) actuator required to complete the repair. I have been unable to locate this component, and Mazda USA has indicated that the part is not available through its U.S. or Canadian parts network. This leaves me with a vehicle that cannot be properly repaired due to the apparent unavailability of a critical engine component. I find it unacceptable that an essential engine component for a Mazda vehicle cannot be sourced through the manufacturer or its authorized parts network. The situation has resulted in significant financial hardship, prolonged vehicle downtime, and the inability to restore my vehicle to proper operating condition. I am concerned that the underlying engine and VVT-related problems may represent a broader safety and reliability issue affecting other owners of 2016 Mazda CX-9 vehicles equipped with the 2.5L turbocharged engine. I respectfully request that NHTSA investigate the reported engine problems, including overheating, cylinder-head cracking, VVT actuator failures, and the availability of replacement components. I also ask that NHTSA determine whether these conditions represent a safety defect that warrants further investigation or corrective action by Mazda.

NHTSA ID
11774862
Incident
Mar 2, 2026
Engine
Filed Oct 6, 2026

We discovered the problem by accident -- pulled out of our garage and there was a coolant puddle on the garage floor. No dashboard warnings, no overheat messages, no visible symptoms before that. That's what makes this failure mode dangerous: it loses coolant silently, and you find out from a puddle or from an overheat, not from the car telling you. A Mazda dealership confirmed the failure during a multi-point inspection by one of their master technicians (September 2026): coolant leaking from the back of the cylinder head, no signs of coolant and oil mixing, and a scan showing no history of overheating. Their recommendation is cylinder head replacement. The vehicle is available for inspection on request. This exact failure mode is a known design defect on 2016-2020 CX-9s with the 2.5T engine. Mazda itself acknowledged it -- special service program CSP11 ("Coolant Leaks at Cylinder Head Warranty Extension," NHTSA doc MC-11011136-0001, issued October 2024). That program extended the powertrain warranty to 10 years / 120,000 miles for precisely this failure, covering vehicles produced before June 2020 -- which includes this one. Here's the part that gets me: my vehicle is in the CSP11 VIN range, and the defect was diagnosed inside the program's 10-year date window. But the odometer is past 120,000 miles, so coverage was denied. The owner notification for CSP11 didn't go out until November 2024 -- to original owners. I bought this vehicle used, and never received that notice, so the extension was effectively invisible to the person actually driving the car as it crossed the mileage threshold. A manufacturer-documented design defect shouldn't lose all coverage on a technicality for used owners. Cause: UNKNOWN. The crack is at the cylinder head stud bolt hole area, matching Mazda's own documentation (TSB 01-002/23). No maintenance schedule prevents a casting crack.

NHTSA ID
11769435
Incident
Sep 10, 2026
Engine
Filed Sep 30, 2026

Cracked head cyclinder leaking. Unsafe to drive, coolant can leak into engine if not already. They are aware of it and extended a warranty for the issue in 2024. However people like me, my coolant didn't leak until this year 2026. There have been lawsuits on this issue, but they are still failing to address this issue. They created another part to replace the defected part which costs around $6000-$7000. Yes, took it to a Mazda dealer and confirmed the issue and they can fix but cost would be out of pocket. No warning at all. The only way this was discovered was the smell of the coolant leaking.

NHTSA ID
11768085
Incident
Jul 15, 2026
Engine
Filed Sep 21, 2026

My car have a manufacturer engine defect that the company or corporation is not willing to fix. Only because I exceeded the warranty I call them (MAZDA) an told them that it wasn't under my control the these issues happened after the warranty expire. But they still refuse to help me.

NHTSA ID
11765988
Incident
Sep 20, 2026
Engine
Filed Aug 19, 2026

Engine revs or surges while in park, possibly faulty throttle box

NHTSA ID
11757879
Incident
Aug 18, 2026
Engine
Filed Apr 28, 2026

The cylinder head (which involves the engine cooling system) has a known manufacturer defect that affects all year/models of the Mazda CX-9 with turbo. The manufacturing defect poses a risk to motor vehicle safety in a group of vehicles or equipment of the same design and/or manufacturer. Specifically, the overheating and failure of the engine can occur at any time, without warning. This puts my family at risk of being stranded on a roadway, particularly because my car is often driven in rural areas. The manufacturing defect is significant and is acknowledged by Mazda: Mazda has offered owners a voluntary, limited, warranty extension (CSP11) of 10 years or 120,000 miles. The voluntary warranty extension is not sufficient because it is limited in duration while the safety risk can happen at any time after the warranty extension expires. The warranty extension essentially only applies to about half of the expected lifetime of the car. NHTSA should determine that a recall and repair should be issued by Mazda that does not expire. The engine is defective, poses a safety hazard, and Mazda has fixed the engine for subsequent models (starting in 2021), so a repair is available.

NHTSA ID
11734209
Incident
Apr 27, 2026
Engine
Filed Dec 22, 2025

I own a 2016 Mazda CX9 Touring FWD (180k miles). Today my car was diagnosed with cracked cylinder head, resulting in coolant and oil leak from the head gasket. While there is a class action settlement about it where Mazda accepted the manufacturing defect, they do not cover the engine repair/cylinder head replacement because my car's mile is over 120k. If it is a manufacturing defect, why year/mile make a difference on the responsibility of the manufacturer? Mazda obviously sold defect vehicles to their customers, and driving these vehicles under this condition is very dangerous! Now, they are expecting me to pay more than $10,000 for a vehicle priced around $6,000!

NHTSA ID
11706610
Incident
Dec 22, 2025
Engine
Filed Nov 3, 2025

In June of 2022 I started having a strong antifreeze/engine coolant smell inside the cab of my vehicle and also outside the vehicle. I had the car checked for a radiator leak, but there wasn’t one. I took my car into my local Mazda where they found that the engine coolant was leaking into the heads of the engine. Mazda kept my car for 5 months and repaired the problem, it cost me $4000 and they had added a 12 month 12,000 mile warranty for the parts. My car is a 2016 Mazda cx-9 at the time of the repair it had 70,430 miles on it. Now a few years later I am having the same issue with the coolant smell inside the cab and outside my vehicle, it goes into the shop for diagnosis on Monday November 10,2025. The car now has 118,000 miles on it. I had purchased an extended warranty for the car at the time of purchase but it had timed out a month before I took my car in for the first repair….please Mazda stand behind your vehicles I am a senior woman with very little income and I will not be able to pay out of pocket for this repair and I CANNOT afford a new car… I would like to get reimbursed for my out of pocket on the first repair and get my car repaired this time as well under a warranty.

NHTSA ID
11697196
Incident
Jun 30, 2025

Manufacturer communications

A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.

09-028-26

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

This bulletin supersedes the previously issued bulletin(s) listed below. The changes are noted below in Red. 09-038/24 08/08/24 NOTE: This service information is NOT applicable to 7th generation Mazda vehicles because the odometer data is stored in the BCM. DESCRIPTION In accordance with Federal regulations, follow the procedure listed below when replacing a speedometer. NOTE: Tampering with a motor vehicle odometer is strictly prohibited by Federal, and State laws. It is the dealer’s responsibility to comply with Federal, State, and local laws concerning odometer and related documentation requirements when providing a repair or replacement. Mazda vehicles are manufactured with tamper-proof speedometers.

SA-041-26a

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM

DESCRIPTION If you encounter any type of electrical concern (e.g, dead battery, engine no start, DTC(s) stored...), interview the customer before proceeding with normal MGSS diagnosis by asking if any aftermarket devices have been installed. Aftermarket devices may be the cause of the electrical concern. Below are a few examples of unusual electrical concerns caused by aftermarket devices. Examples: 1. Devices connected to the DLC-2 (battery discharge/DTC stored) 2. Devices plugged into the 12V outlet 3. GPS tracking device (engine no start/battery discharge) 4. Dash cam (DTC stored) 5. Non-certified USB cable (Apple Carplay™/ Android Auto™ will not connect) 6. Over-sized wheels/tires (incorrect GPS location) 7. DTC C0023:14 8. Decorative trim and/or cover on the START/STOP ENGINE button

SA-041-26

ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; ENGINE

This SA supersedes the previously issued SA(s) listed below. The changes are noted in Red. SA-061/25 12/17/25 DESCRIPTION If you encounter any type of electrical concern (e.g, dead battery, engine no start, DTC(s) stored...), interview the customer before proceeding with normal MGSS diagnosis by asking if any aftermarket devices have been installed. Aftermarket devices may be the cause of the electrical concern. Below are a few examples of unusual electrical concerns caused by aftermarket devices. Examples: 1. Devices connected to the DLC-2 (battery discharge/DTC stored) 2. Devices plugged into the 12V outlet 3. GPS tracking device (engine no start/battery discharge) 4. Dash cam (DTC stored) 5. Non-certified USB cable (Apple Carplay™/ Android Auto™ will not connect) 6. Over-sized wheels/tires (incorrect GPS location) 7. DTC C0023:14 8. Decorative trim and/or cover on the START/STOP ENGINE button Example 1: Some electrical devices connected to the DLC-2 connector by insurance or mobile phone companies may cause: Battery discharge. The device may disrupt the CAN system battery saver mode. • IDS/MMDS will not communicate with the vehicle due to poor DLC-2 connection. The aftermarket device may cause DLC-2 female terminals to spread open.

01-008-26

POWER TRAIN

This bulletin supersedes the previously issued bulletin(s) listed below. The changes are noted in Red. 01-008/23 06/05/23 Some vehicles may exhibit rattling noises from the engine compartment and oil leakage from the drive belt auto tensioner. This may be caused by insufficient sealing at the drive belt auto tensioner damper when the auto tensioner fully operates under both high ambient temperature and high load conditions. To eliminate this concern, the shape of the drive belt auto tensioner damper has been changed. REPAIR PROCEDURE If the tensioner is found to be "No Good" after completing the Drive Belt Auto Tensioner Inspection, replace it with a modified part according to the instructions on MGSS online:

SA-031-26

STRUCTURE:BODY

DESCRIPTION Some vehicles may require the replacement of a damaged VIN plate or vehicle certification label. To obtain a replacement VIN plate (bulkhead-mounted and visible through the lower-left area of the windshield), contact DAG (Dealer Assistance Group) using VIN Plate Request Form available on One Mazda. To obtain a replacement vehicle certification label (located on the B􀀀pillar or front door), contact your assigned DSM (District Service Manager) to place the order. If DSM contact information is not available, refer to the Dealer & Field Contact Directory.

SA-029-26

ENGINE; POWER TRAIN; SERVICE BRAKES

This Service Alert supersedes the previously issued SA listed below: The changes are noted in Red. SA-011/24 02/12/24, 06/06/24, 07/29/24 DESCRIPTION Mazda has developed factory recommended scheduled maintenance services that support all major vehicle systems. Mazda recommends dealers follow the scheduled maintenance tables as cited in the vehicle-specific workshop manual or owner's manual. Services performed outside of Mazda's factory scheduled maintenance are not recommended. These services are unnecessary and create unneeded expenses for your customers. SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE Refer to the applicable Workshop Manual or Owner's Manual for vehicle -specific manufacturer scheduled maintenance. Workshop Manual - Refer to section 00-00 SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE. Owner's Manual - Refer to section 8 Maintenance and Care. b. Note: Please refer to the information below outlining the services not included in Mazda's Factory Scheduled Maintenance: IMPORTANT: Recommending fluid flushes when not necessary can lead to customer confusion and dissatisfaction. Fluid flushing for preventive maintenance purposes is strongly discouraged, unless otherwise specified in a published procedure (Owner’s Manual, Workshop Manual, Technical Service Bulletin, etc.).

Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.

Compare model years

Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model

Mazda CX-9 by model year
YearComplaintsRecallsInvestigationsIssue Index
2023130050.3
2022110052.7
2021411054.6
2020191047.8
2019542048.4
20181282050.8
2017610035.5
2016Viewing1080040.4
2015352044.4
2014543148.5
2013684258.0
20122214256.3
20111714358.7
20101956359.9
2009597153.1
20081726256.4
2007866152.4

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.