VISIBILITY
1994 Mercedes-Benz 320
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 49 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 1994 Mercedes-Benz 320, most frequently naming the electrical, engine and airbags categories. 1 safety recall has been issued covering this model year.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 1996 | 1 | 1 |
| Jun 1998 | 1 | 2 |
| Dec 1998 | 1 | 3 |
| Oct 1999 | 1 | 4 |
| Nov 1999 | 1 | 5 |
| Apr 2001 | 2 | 7 |
| Jul 2002 | 1 | 8 |
| Sep 2002 | 1 | 9 |
| Jul 2004 | 1 | 10 |
| Aug 2004 | 1 | 11 |
| Apr 2005 | 1 | 12 |
| Jul 2005 | 1 | 13 |
| Aug 2005 | 1 | 14 |
| Jan 2006 | 2 | 16 |
| May 2006 | 1 | 17 |
| Jun 2006 | 2 | 19 |
| Aug 2006 | 1 | 20 |
| Sep 2006 | 1 | 21 |
| Oct 2006 | 2 | 23 |
| Apr 2007 | 1 | 24 |
| Jul 2007 | 1 | 25 |
| Aug 2007 | 1 | 26 |
| Sep 2007 | 2 | 28 |
| Oct 2007 | 1 | 29 |
| Dec 2007 | 1 | 30 |
| Feb 2008 | 1 | 31 |
| Mar 2008 | 1 | 32 |
| Apr 2008 | 2 | 34 |
| May 2008 | 1 | 35 |
| Jul 2008 | 2 | 37 |
| Sep 2008 | 2 | 39 |
| Oct 2008 | 1 | 40 |
| Nov 2008 | 1 | 41 |
| May 2009 | 1 | 42 |
| Jun 2009 | 1 | 43 |
| Jan 2010 | 1 | 44 |
| Mar 2011 | 1 | 45 |
| Aug 2011 | 1 | 46 |
| Mar 2012 | 1 | 47 |
| Nov 2012 | 1 | 48 |
| Mar 2013 | 1 | 49 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Electrical4272.4%
- Engine58.6%
- Airbags46.9%
- Interior & seats23.4%
- Heating & air conditioning23.4%
- Powertrain (other)11.7%
- Suspension11.7%
- Tires & wheels11.7%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
1 campaign cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govRecent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
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
- NHTSA ID
- 10500882
- Incident
- Feb 7, 2013
- Mileage
- 192,350 mi
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1994 MERCEDES BENZ E320. THE CONTACT STATED THAT WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 5 MPH, THE INDICATOR LIGHTS REMAINED ILLUMINATED ERRONEOUSLY, CAUSING THE BATTERY TO DRAIN. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A INDEPENDENT MECHANIC AND A DEALER FOR DIAGNOSTIC TESTING. THE MECHANIC ADVISED THE CONTACT THAT THE ELECTRICAL WIRING HARNESS AND WIRES HAD TO BE REPLACED. THE MANUFACTURER WAS NOT MADE AWARE OF THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE APPROXIMATE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 145,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 146,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 10483531
- Incident
- Nov 15, 2011
- Mileage
- 145,000 mi
TL* THE CONTACT OWNS A 1994 MERCEDES BENZ E320. THE CONTACT STATED THAT THE WIRING HARNESS RUSTED, CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO STALL. THE DEALER AND MANUFACTURER WERE NOTIFIED OF THE FAILURE, BUT DENIED ANY ASSISTANCE WITH REPAIRING THE VEHICLE. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 55,000. UPDATED EVOQ 03/28/12
- NHTSA ID
- 10451959
- Incident
- Feb 13, 2012
- Mileage
- 55,000 mi
I HAVE A 1994 E320, IM GOING TO SUM THIS UP, THE HARNESS IS JUNK, MY CAR STALLS ON THE FREEWAY, USES UP GAS LIKE A RUNNING HOSE, GOT 6 MILES ON 12.00 WORTH OF GAS, LIGHTS FLICKER, WHEN I CUT BACK THE TAPE IT LOOKED LIKE SOMEONE PUT CIG TOBACCO IN THE WIRE, THEN I LOOKED AND IT WAS THE INSULATION THAT HAD TURNED TO NOTHING, ALL WIRES ARE RUBBING. THE FUEL INJ. GET FLOODS WITH OIL,GAS. ITS A MESS AND THEY WANT OVER 1000.00 TO GET A NEW ONE. RECALL THIS HARNESS BEFORE PEOPLE START TO DIE. *TR
- NHTSA ID
- 10419345
- Incident
- Nov 10, 2010
- Mileage
- 150,000 mi
TL* THE CONTACT OWNED A 1994 MERCEDES E-320. WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 65 MPH, THE CONTACT ENGAGED THE AIR CONDITIONER AND SMOKE BEGAN EMITTING FROM THE VENTS. THE VEHICLE WAS TOWED TO AN INDEPENDENT MECHANIC WHERE THE CONTACT WAS TOLD THAT THE AIR CONDITIONING WIRES HAD MELTED. THE VEHICLE WAS REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 288,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS UNKNOWN. THE VIN WAS UNAVAILABLE.
- NHTSA ID
- 10386853
- Incident
- Sep 8, 2010
- Mileage
- 288,000 mi
1. MULTIPLE WARNING LIGHT ALARMS OVER 12 MONTH PERIOD. 2. AFTER MANY FRUITLESS AND EXPENSIVE REPAIRS OF SENSORS, THE PROBLEM WAS TRACED TO A DEFECTIVE ENGINE MAIN WIRING HARNESS, WHERE THE INSULATION ON INDIVIDUAL WIRES HAD LARGELY DISINTEGRATED. THIS WAS REPORTEDLY DUE TO USE OF DEFECTIVE INSULATION AT THE TIME OF MANUFACTURE, WHICH OVER TIME AND NORMAL USE, WOULD DISINTEGRATE AND BREAK OFF, ENABLING INDIVIDUAL WIRES IN THE HARNESS TO SHORT TOGETHER. THE REPAIR FACILITY HAD MAYBE 20-25 OF THESE FAILED HARNESSES HANGING ON THE WALL AS A DISPLAY - THIS IS IN A SMALL TOWN, SO THE TOTAL NUMBER MUST BE VERY LARGE IN THE USA. MERCEDES BENZ REFUSED TO TAKE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE PROBLEM OR THE REPAIR, CLAIMING ESSENTIALLY THAT IN 10 YEARS FROM MANUFACTURE DATE, ANYTHING CAN HAPPEN TO A VEHICLE AND THAT IS NOT THEIR RESPONSIBILITY. THIS FAILURE PRODUCED UNSAFE CONDITIONS, THE CAR WOULD FAIL TO START, STOP RUNNING ON THE ROAD AND WOULD FAIL TO RESTART, ETC. 3. THE WIRING HARNESS WAS REPLACED, AT MY COST OF CLOSE TO $1000. THE PROBLEM HAS NOT RECURRED SINCE. THE OLD PART IS STILL AVAILABLE FOR INSPECTION. *TR
- NHTSA ID
- 10298842
- Incident
- Jun 3, 2003
- Mileage
- 71,000 mi
I WAS GETTING THE CAR DYEING IN THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD, AND AT STOP LIGHTS AND SMOKE OUT FROM UNDER MY HOOD, THEN TOOK IT TO MECHANIC WHO TOLD ME OF A PROBLEM WITH MERCEDES WIRING FROM 91-96. THIS IS A WELL KNOWN PROBLEM THAT MERCEDES WILL NOT FESS UP TO!!! THE HARNESS COST ME OVER $600.00!!!!! FOR WHAT THEY PROBABLY PAID 10.00 TO HAVE MADE FOR THEM. WHERE IS MY GOVERNMENT TO PROTECT ME AND OTHERS FOR WHAT IS OBVIOUSLY A WELL KNOWN PROBLEM WITH THESE VEHICLES? DOES SOMEONE HAVE TO DIE BEFORE IT GETS LOOKED AT SERIOUSLY? GO TO ANY MERCEDES FORUM AND THERE WILL BE PAGES UPON PAGES OF COMPLAINTS ABOUT THIS VERY PROBLEM?????!!!!!!!! *TR
- NHTSA ID
- 10273162
- Incident
- May 29, 2009
- Mileage
- 150,000 mi
1994 MERCEDES E320 ENGINE WIRING HARNESS, IT IS COMMONLY KNOWN IN THE MB COMMUNITY THAT THESE CARS WIRING HARNESS WAS MADE FROM DEFECTIVE MATERIALS AND PRONE TO PREMATURE FAILURE. THIS HARNESS COSTS AROUND 1000.00 WHY IS MY GOVERNMENT NOT PROTECTING IT'S PEOPLE FROM THIS FRAUD?! *TR
- NHTSA ID
- 10270105
- Incident
- May 27, 2009
- Mileage
- 152,000 mi
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.