EQUIPMENT:RECREATIONAL VEHICLE/TRAILER
2000 Monaco Coach Diplomat
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 14 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2000 Monaco Coach Diplomat, most frequently naming the body & structure, visibility and electrical categories. 2 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; and 4 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 2000 | 1 | 1 |
| Jun 2000 | 1 | 2 |
| Nov 2000 | 1 | 3 |
| Jul 2001 | 2 | 5 |
| Jan 2002 | 1 | 6 |
| Feb 2002 | 1 | 7 |
| Apr 2002 | 1 | 8 |
| Jul 2002 | 1 | 9 |
| Apr 2003 | 1 | 10 |
| Dec 2003 | 1 | 11 |
| Aug 2006 | 1 | 12 |
| Feb 2008 | 1 | 13 |
| Jun 2008 | 1 | 14 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Body & structure635.3%
- Visibility317.6%
- Electrical211.8%
- Other / unspecified211.8%
- Interior & seats15.9%
- Suspension15.9%
- Tires & wheels15.9%
- Heating & air conditioning15.9%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
2 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govSEAT BELTS:FRONT:BUCKLE ASSEMBLY
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
THIS INVOLVES A NORCOLD 1200 LRIM REFRIGERATOR AND A 2000 MONACO DIPLOMAT 40 PBD MOTORCOACH. WHEN THE REFER WAS REMOVED TO CONDUCT THE RECALL WORK, IT WAS FOUND TO HAVE CAUGHT FIRE PREVIOUSLY, AND HAD SIGNS OF SERIOUS OVERHEATING, CAUSING THE CASE OF THE REFRIGERATOR TO PARALYZE (ALUMINUM FOIL COATING, PAPER BACKING AND FOAM INSULATION BEHIND FLUE TUBE). FURTHER A FIRE HAD OCCURRED ON THE TOP OF THE FLUE TUBE, WHERE FIBERGLASS INSULATION FROM THE COACH HAD BEEN IN CONTACT WITH THE TOP OF THE FLUE TUBE, CAUSING CHARRING TO THE INSULATION AND CEILING OF THE COACH, WITH THE EARLY STAGES OF PARALYSIS SETTING IN ON THE CEILING MATERIALS (FOAM AND OZITE CARPET COVERING). PHOTOS OF EVERYTHING WERE TAKEN, AND NORCOLD DENIED CULPABILITY, STATING THAT THE COOLING UNIT HAD NOT "BEEN A LEAKER" AND THAT MAINTENANCE HAD NOT BEEN DONE, WHICH IS NOT COMPLETELY TRUE, ALTHOUGH SOME MAINTENANCE ITEMS WERE NOT PERFORMED ACCORDING TO THE OWNER'S MANUAL (REMOVAL OF THE REFER FROM THE COACH AND SERVICING THE FLUE TUBE). MY CONCERNS ARE 1)OVERHEATING OF THE COOLING UNIT/FLUE TUBE DURING NORMAL OPS WITHOUT FAILURE OF THE COOLING UNIT (RECALL) AND 2) INCORRECT INSTALLATION OF REFER IN CABINET/INSTALLATION OF INSULATION WHICH LED TO CONTACT WITH SAID MATERIALS AND SLOW PARALYSIS/IGNITION. THIS COULD BE A CONDITION IN ALL OF THESE COACHES. *TR
- NHTSA ID
- 10231893
- Incident
- Jun 14, 2008
- Mileage
- 24,184 mi
ON 10/15/02 WHILE DRIVING MY RV TO A CAMPGROUND, I DETECTED A VERY STRONG ODOR OF ANTIFREEZE INSIDE THE RV AND NOTICED WETNESS ON THE CARPET NEAR THE FIRE WALL. IT RENDERED THE DEFROSTING OF THE FRONT WINDSHIELD NIL AND COULDN'T HARDLY SEE OUTSIDE AND DAMAGE THE SIDE COMPARTMENT OF THE R.V. THE UNIT WAS UNDER WARRANTY AND MONACO REPLACED THE DAMAGED HEATER CORE ON 12/23/02. ON 1/20/08 ON A TRIP TO ORLANDO THE SAME PROBLEM OCCURRED AGAIN. I ALMOST PASSED OUT AT THE WHEEL BECAUSE OF THE STRONG ODOR OF ANTIFREEZE LEAKING AGAIN INSIDE THE COACH. SAME PROBLEM: SPITED HEATER CORE. THE PLUMBING OF HEATER IS INCORRECT AND MONACO REFUSE TO ACKNOWLEDGED THE PROBLEM. *TR
- NHTSA ID
- 10217135
- Incident
- Dec 23, 2007
- Mileage
- 16,000 mi
DT*: THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING 55 MPH ON NORMAL ROAD CONDITIONS, THE RV'S WINDSHIELD CRACKED AND BECAME LOOSE. THE INCIDENT HAPPENED AFTER A YEAR OF OPERATION. THE WINDSHIELD WAS REPLACED AT A VEHICLE GLASS SHOP. THE DEALERSHIP DID NOT ASSUME ANY RESPONSIBILITY OVER THE WINDSHIELD FAILURE. THE CONSUMER STATED THE WINDSHIELD MOVED OVER AN INCH. UPDATED 09/20/06. *JB
- NHTSA ID
- 10166802
- Incident
- Jun 9, 2006
- Mileage
- 32,000 mi
WHILE DRIVING AT 65 MPH AND WITH NO WARNING FRONT RIGHT TIRE TREAD SEPARATED, CAUSING THE TIRE TO BLOWOUT, AND DAMAGE THE VEHICLE. THIS HAPPENED IN DECEMBER 2002. ON JUNE 14 2003, WHILE DRIVING AT 65 MPH , LEFT FRONT TIRE TREAD SEPARATED, CAUSING A BLOWOUT. CONSUMER HAD TO PULL OVER, AND TOWED THE MOTOR HOME. GOODYEAR G159, SIZE R255/70 R22.5. THERE ARE A POLICE REPORT AND PICTURES. *AK *NM
- NHTSA ID
- 10037738
- Incident
- Jun 28, 2003
- Mileage
- 36,000 mi
THIS 2000 MONACO, DIPLOMAT MOTOR HOME HAS BEEN INHALING EXHAUST, ROAD DIRTY ETC. MAINLY THROUGH THE REAR CAP AREA, SINCE THE UNIT WAS NEW. THE FIRST SIGN WAS AN OILY STAIN IN THE CEILING AREA MOSTLY AROUND CABINETS. FOR APPROXIMATELY FIVE MONTHS THE FACTORY TOLD ME THEY DID NOT KNOW WHAT THE PROBLEM WAS AND UNTIL I FORCED THE ISSUE IN THE FALL OF 2001, I DID NOT GET THE ANSWER. THE UNIT HAD NOT BEEN SEALED AT THE FACTORY. IT WAS SEALED IN 2001 THOUGH NEVER TESTED, THE PROBLEM CONTINUES AS OF TODAY! THE UNIT HAD AN ENVIRONMENTAL TEST IN OCTOBER 2001 WITH THE REPORT ISSUED JANUARY 2002 (ENCLOSED) AFTER MONTHS OF TRYING TO SEAL THE UNIT IT STILL LEAKS. IT HAS CAUSED SICKNESS AND ALSO POSSES A HEALTH AND SAFETY RISK AS THE FUMES ARE ALSO ENTERING THE DRIVERS COMPARTMENT. IT WAS INDICATED BY A SENIOR MANAGEMENT OFFICIAL THIS PROBLEM HAS BEEN ON GOING SINCE THE EARLY 1990'S. MONACO, THE MANUFACTURER HAS NOT DEMONSTRATED IT'S ABILITY TO BE ABLE TO FIX THE UNIT, HAS NOT OFFERED TO REPLACE IT AND WILL NOT DO A RECALL ON ALL THESE UNITS AS I HAVE REQUESTED OF THE CEO. *JB
- NHTSA ID
- 10016239
- Incident
- Oct 15, 2001
- Mileage
- 10,000 mi
THE CONSUMER STATES THAT THE OPERATION OF ONE/BOTH REAR LEVELING JACK(S) WILL INTRODUCE A TORSIONAL OR TWISTING MOVEMENT OF THE COACH CHASSIS, WHICH OVER TIME WILL LOOSEN THE WINDSHIELD FROM THE FRAME AND CAUSE ONE EDGE/CORNER TO UNSEAT/PARTIALLY SEPARATE FROM THE MOLDING GASKET CREATING AN AIR GAP. (OTHER PROBLEMS WHICH ROOT FROM THE REAR LEVEL JACK(S) ARE: ELECTRICAL, THE BODY SHIFTING CAUSED THE DOORS TO BIND, 4 TIMES THE PLASTIC LATCH ON THE EXTERIOR CARGO COMPARTMENT DOORS HAVE BROKEN, ALSO CAUSING THE BATTERY INVERTER SYSTEM TO OVER CHARGE THE COACH BATTERY(S). THE MOTORHOME IS UNSAFE TO DRIVE. THE MANUFACTURER STATES THAT THIS OCCURS WHEN THE LEVELING SYSTEM IS BEING USED IMPROPERLY. THE CONSUMER WAS TOLD BY MONACO THAT SOME SERVICE DEPARTMENTS FAILED TO USE PROPER INSTALLATION TECHNIQUES/DID NOT ALLOW PROPER CURVING OF THE WINDSHIELD SEALANT BEFORE PLACING THE VEHICLE BACK INTO SERVICE. *SCC *TS
- NHTSA ID
- 566793
THE SLIDEOUT ROOM RETAINING CLAMPS ("TRAVEL LOCKS") CAUSE A DANGEROUS SITUATION. I WAS HIT, (NEARLY ON THE BACK OF THE HEAD) BY A LOOSE "TRAVEL LOCK" WHICH VIBRATED OUT OF PLACE DUE TO SLIDEOUT ROOM VIBRATION. THERE IS NO _POSITIVE_ MEANS OF SECURING THE CLAMP (TRAVEL LOCK) IN PLACE... ONLY FRICTION. THE CLAMP (TRAVEL LOCK) JUST VIBRATES OUT OF POSITION AS THE SLIDEOUT ROOM VIBRATES WHEN THE COACH TRAVELS DOWN THE ROAD. MONACO DOES NOT PROVIDE INSTRUCTIONS OR DIAGRAM OF SLIDEOUT LOCK INSTALLATION. THE (CLAMP TRAVEL LOCK) WAS INSTALLED AT DELIVERY TO FIT BETWEEN THE METAL FLANGE OF THE SLIDEOUT AND THE WALL. MONACO'S SUGGESTION TO TIGHTEN THE CLAMP ANY MORE WOULD MAKE IT IMPOSSIBLE TO FIT. MONACO'S SUGGESTION TO ADJUST THE LOCK SO IT FITS BETWEEN THE WOOD FASCIA AND WALL IS MEANINGLESS SINCE, AT THE LARGEST ADJUSTMENT, THE CLAMP (TRAVEL LOCK) IS STILL 1 1/2" TOO SHORT. MONACO SHOULD PROVIDE TRAVEL LOCKS WITH A POSITIVE MEANS OF SECURING IN PLACE, NOT JUST FRICTION.*AIK
- NHTSA ID
- 760064
- Incident
- Mar 24, 2000
CONSUMER HAS A TEN GALLON GAS OR ELECTRIC ATWOOD WATER HEATER (MODEL # GC10A-32 SERIAL # 941130430) WHEN PUT ON PROPANE WITH THE WIND BLOWING TOWARDS IT, IT TESTED TO 70 PARTS PER MILLION IN 15 MINUTES. *TT
- NHTSA ID
- 564411
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
STRUCTURE:BODY
SUBJECT REGARDING ORDERS FOR SCREEN DOOR HANDLE ASSEMBLIES. *TT
STRUCTURE:BODY:DOOR
INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE DOOR HANDLE TEARDROP STRIKER. *TT
STRUCTURE:BODY:DOOR
SUBJECT PERTAINS TO SCREEN DOOR HANDLE ASSEMBLIES. *TT
CONCERNS WITH THE OVERHEAD TELEVISION CABINET TRIM RING NOT SECURED PROPERLY. *TT
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.