RoadVitals

2004 Ford Mountaineer

Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data

Data refreshed

Owner complaintsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
4
Latest Dec 31, 2007
Safety recallsA safety recall is issued when a manufacturer or NHTSA determines that a vehicle has a safety-related defect or does not comply with a federal motor vehicle safety standard. Recall repairs are free. Whether a specific vehicle is covered depends on its VIN — a recall listed for a model year does not necessarily apply to every vehicle of that year.
0
InvestigationsNHTSA opens an investigation to examine whether a safety defect may exist. An open investigation is not a determination that a defect exists, and many investigations close without a recall. Investigations can, however, lead to one.
0
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
1

Overview

Our database contains 4 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2004 Ford Mountaineer, most frequently naming the body & structure, driver assistance and electrical categories. 5 manufacturer communications are on file.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

What owners report

Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded

  • Body & structure240.0%
  • Driver assistance120.0%
  • Electrical120.0%
  • Visibility120.0%

Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.

Safety recalls

No recalls in our database for this model year

That does not guarantee a specific vehicle is unaffected — recalls are issued against VINs, and new campaigns are announced regularly. Check a VIN on NHTSA.gov.

Recent owner complaints

Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words

Body & structure
Filed Dec 31, 2007

TAILGATE HAS A CRACK IN THE FIBERGLASS, BELOW THE WINDSHIELD TRAVELING DOWN. THERE IS NO IDENTIFIED REASON FOR THIS CRACK. I HAVE BEEN TOLD BY THE DEALERSHIP THIS IS COMMONLY SEEN IN THE MOUNTAINEER AND EXPLORERS. THE CRACK INDICATES A MANUFACTURER DEFECT HOWEVER FORD/MERCURY HAS NOT MADE THE RECALL. *TR

NHTSA ID
10213276
Incident
Dec 31, 2007
Mileage
54,350 mi
Body & structureVisibility
Filed Jun 20, 2007

THERE IS A CRACK THAT EXTENDS DOWN THE LIFTGATE ON THE 2004 FORD EXPLORER. I HAVE NO EVENTS LEADING UP TO THIS FAILURE. IF THIS CRACK IS NOT REPAIRED INEVITABLY THERE WILL BE WATER DAMAGE TO THE ELECTRICAL COMPONENTS IN THE LIFT DOOR SUCH AS A FAILURE OF THE REAR WINDOW DEFROSTER AND REAR WINDOW WIPER. I WISH TO HAVE THIS FAILURE REPAIRED AT MY FORD AUTHORIZED DEALER AT YOUR COST. ADDITIONALLY, THE TWO REAR WINDOWS WILL NOT LET DOWN. I HAVE CHECKED THE FUSES AND HAVE REPLACED ONE THAT WAS BROKEN. IT SOLVED THE PROBLEM ONCE. THE PROBLEM RECURRED, AND I HAVE CHECKED THE FUSES AGAIN. THIS TIME NONE OF THEM WERE BROKEN. IF THIS PROBLEM WAS NOT REPAIRED, I BELIEVE ALL THE WINDOWS MAY EVENTUALLY BE FROZEN, POSSIBLY IN THE DOWN POSITION , CAUSING DAMAGE TO THE INTERIOR OR IN THE UP POSITION WHICH WAS NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR GOING THROUGH DRIVE ,THROUGH BANKING, FAST FOODS, TOLL BOOTHS, ETC. *AK MY THIRD COMPLAINT IS THAT MY TURN SIGNALS ARE

NHTSA ID
10193864
Incident
Jun 18, 2007
Electrical
Filed Jun 19, 2005

I DRIVE A 2004 FORD EXPLORER XLT. THIS VEHICLE HAS STALLED ON MY WIFE AND I NUMEROUS DIFFERENT TIMES WITH IN THE 14 MONTHS OF OWNING THE SUV. AT ONE POINT WE WERE ALMOST IN A ACCIDENT WITH OUR 1 YEAR DAUGHTER IN THE CAR. WE HAVE BROUGHT THIS TO THE ATTENTION OF THE FORD COMPANY 6 DIFFERENT TIMES AND THEIR RESPONSE IS UNLESS FORD CAN DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM THEY REFUSE TO ALLOW US TO RECEIVE A NEW VEHICLE. WHEN I ASKED THE ZONE MANGER WHAT THEY CAN DO THEY SAID THEY WOULD HAVE TO PUT A COMPUTER INSTRUMENT ON THE CAR AND DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM BEFORE THEY WOULD BEGIN TO NEGOTIATE A NEW CAR. THE COMPUTER INSTRUMENT HAS BEEN PUT ON THE CAR THREE DIFFERENT TIMES NOW. WE WERE ALSO TOLD THAT IF WE BROUGHT THE CAR BACK TO FORD WITHIN 24 HOURS OF THE CAR STALLING THEY WOULD BE ABLE TO TELL US WHAT WAS WRONG WITH IT. WE HAVE BROUGHT IT BACK 3 TIMES WITHIN THE 24 HOUR TIME PERIOD AND THEY HAVE COME UP WITH NOTHING. IN TOTAL FORD HAS HAD THIS VEHICLE FOR NEAR THIRTY DAYS AT DIFFERENT TIMES TRYING TO DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM, LEAVING MY WIFE AND I WITHOUT AN SUV. THEY TOLD ME THAT THEY CAN EITHER DRIVE THE CAR WITH THE INSTRUMENT ON IT OR THAT I COULD DRIVE IT WITH THE INSTRUMENT TO TRY AND DUPLICATE THE PROBLEM. I TOLD THEM I WAS REALLY NOT COMFORTABLE DRIVING IT AND THEY SAID THAT IT'S ONE OR THE OTHER. I TOLD THEM I REFUSE TO PUT MY FAMILY IN DANGER AND THEY SAID THEN YOU ARE GOING TO BE WITHOUT YOUR CAR! THIS CAR HAS BEEN BROUGHT BACK TO FORD 10 TIMES FOR DIFFERENT PROBLEMS SINCE I BOUGHT IT. I HAVE INVESTED OVER $8,000.00 INTO THIS VEHICLE IN 14 MONTHS AND THE FORD COMPANY HAS OFFERED NO RETRIBUTION FOR THE ONGOING PROBLEMS. THIS HAS IMPACTED MY FAMILY SO GREATLY THAT WE NOW HAVE AN ATTORNEY LOOKING AT THE LEMON LAW STATUTES BECAUSE WE ARE TOO FEARFUL OF GETTING BACK INTO IT.

NHTSA ID
10125734
Incident
Jun 16, 2005
Mileage
13,000 mi
Driver assistance
Filed May 4, 2005
Crash reported

CONTACT STATED: FAMILY HAD JUST COME BACK FROM A FOUR HOUR ROAD TRIP AFTER USING CRUISE CONTROL. HUSBAND WAS IN CAR WHEN IT IDLED NORMALLY, BUT AS SOON AS IT WAS PUT IN REVERSE IT LURCHED BACKWARD VERY QUICKLY. WHEN VEHICLE WAS STOPPED FINALLY IT WAS THEN PUT INTO DRIVE. THE PROBLEM HAPPENED AGAIN CAR LURCHED FORWARD. SUBSEQUENTLY, STRIKING ANOTHER VEHICLE. THE BRAKE WAS DEPRESSED ALL THE WAY DURING THE ENTIRE EVENT.*AK

NHTSA ID
10119834
Incident
Apr 19, 2005
Mileage
20,000 mi

Manufacturer communications

A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.

TSB 20-2233

STRUCTURE

This article supersedes TSB 19-2026 to update the vehicle model years affected. Some 2000 and newer Ford/Lincoln/Mercury vehicles equipped with aluminum body panels may exhibit corrosion concerns appearing as bubbled and/or peeling paint with or without accompanying white dust. Panel replacement is recommended.

18478

POWER TRAIN:AXLE ASSEMBLY

AXLE SEAL LEAKS. *EH

18466

POWER TRAIN:AXLE ASSEMBLY

AXLE WHINE HOWL. THIS INCLUDES 1997-05 FORD VEHICLES. *EH

05310

SEAT BELTS

SAFETY BELT WEB STOP BUTTON SERVICE. *EH

18423

POWER TRAIN:AXLE ASSEMBLY

AXLE WHINE HOWL SERVICE WITH INDIVIDUAL PARTS INSTEAD OF AN AXLE ASSEMBLY. *EH

Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.

Compare model years

Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model

Ford Mountaineer by model year
YearComplaintsRecallsInvestigationsIssue Index
2004Viewing400
2003310
2002112243.4
2001110
2000210
1999611
1998521
1997710
1996000
1995000

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.