PARKING BRAKE
2015 Mazda Mazda6
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 60 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2015 Mazda Mazda6, most frequently naming the brakes, powertrain (other) and visibility categories. 3 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; and 608 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 2014 | 1 | 1 |
| Oct 2014 | 3 | 4 |
| Dec 2014 | 1 | 5 |
| Jan 2015 | 2 | 7 |
| Feb 2015 | 1 | 8 |
| Mar 2015 | 2 | 10 |
| Apr 2015 | 1 | 11 |
| Jul 2015 | 3 | 14 |
| Aug 2015 | 2 | 16 |
| Sep 2015 | 1 | 17 |
| Jan 2016 | 1 | 18 |
| Apr 2016 | 1 | 19 |
| May 2016 | 1 | 20 |
| Nov 2016 | 1 | 21 |
| Jan 2017 | 1 | 22 |
| Feb 2017 | 1 | 23 |
| May 2017 | 2 | 25 |
| Aug 2017 | 1 | 26 |
| Oct 2017 | 1 | 27 |
| Nov 2017 | 3 | 30 |
| Dec 2017 | 2 | 32 |
| Jan 2018 | 3 | 35 |
| Feb 2018 | 2 | 37 |
| Apr 2018 | 1 | 38 |
| May 2018 | 1 | 39 |
| Sep 2018 | 3 | 42 |
| Oct 2018 | 1 | 43 |
| Apr 2019 | 2 | 45 |
| Oct 2019 | 1 | 46 |
| Aug 2020 | 1 | 47 |
| Oct 2020 | 1 | 48 |
| Oct 2021 | 1 | 49 |
| Mar 2022 | 1 | 50 |
| Nov 2022 | 1 | 51 |
| Jan 2023 | 1 | 52 |
| Jun 2023 | 1 | 53 |
| Oct 2023 | 1 | 54 |
| Aug 2024 | 1 | 55 |
| Sep 2024 | 1 | 56 |
| Dec 2024 | 1 | 57 |
| Feb 2025 | 1 | 58 |
| Apr 2025 | 1 | 59 |
| May 2025 | 1 | 60 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Brakes1722.4%
- Powertrain (other)810.5%
- Visibility79.2%
- Airbags67.9%
- Body & structure67.9%
- Electrical67.9%
- Other / unspecified45.3%
- Suspension45.3%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
3 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govTIRES:PRESSURE MONITORING AND REGULATING SYSTEMS
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM:ALTERNATOR/GENERATOR/REGULATOR
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
The contact owns a 2015 Mazda Mazda6. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed, there was a loud clanking sound coming from the rear end on the passenger's side. The contact stated that while the vehicle was parked, the contact noticed that the rear end of the vehicle was severely corroded. The contact reached out to a mobile independent mechanic, and it was determined that the underbody of the vehicle was severely damaged and could not be repaired or replaced. The dealer was contacted. The vehicle was not diagnosed or repaired. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 111,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11658432
- Incident
- Jan 1, 2025
- Mileage
- 111,000 mi
The contact owns a 2015 Mazda Mazda6. The contact stated while driving at an undisclosed speed, there was an abnormally loud clicking sound coming from the vehicle. The contact stated that the rear of the vehicle was bouncing, and the clicking sound was extremely loud. The contact stopped and parked the vehicle. The contact was fearful of driving the vehicle. The vehicle was towed to the residence. The contact stated that an independent mobile mechanic visited the residence and inspected the vehicle. The vehicle was diagnosed with severe corrosion of the suspension. The contact was informed that the corrosion was irreparable. In addition, the contact was informed that the rear passenger’s side suspension was fractured due to severe corrosion. The dealer that sold the vehicle was made aware of the failure but provided no assistance. The contact stated that the vehicle had been parked since the failure. The manufacturer was not made aware of the failure. The failure mileage was approximately 100,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11656508
- Incident
- Jan 14, 2025
- Mileage
- 100,000 mi
Fuel started leaking after 90,000 miles when tank is over 3/4 full.
- NHTSA ID
- 11641324
- Incident
- Jan 1, 2024
The contact owns a 2015 Mazda Mazda6. The contact stated that after refueling, the odor of fuel was present inside and outside the vehicle. The contact stated that there was fuel leaking underneath the rear driver's side of the vehicle. The contact stated that the failure occurred whenever there was more than 3/4 tank full of fuel in the fuel tank. The cause of the failure was not yet determined. The local dealer and manufacturer were not yet notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 90,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11630400
- Incident
- Sep 12, 2024
- Mileage
- 90,000 mi
See attached document for complaint.
- NHTSA ID
- 11616869
- Incident
- Sep 3, 2024
Hi, car was involved in a small fender bender. Airbags were NOT deployed. However, an error code 19 (B0001) came on the dash related to driver side sensor. If not fixed, airbags will not deploy in case of accident and that puts me and my family in danger. Dealer won't service the vehicle because it has more than 100,000 miles (122,000 miles to be exact on my car). Other mechanics won't touch the airbag system. What am I supposed to do as the car is not safe to be driven and dealer refusing to help.
- NHTSA ID
- 11611049
- Incident
- Aug 24, 2024
Emergency brake Calipers not working. Same problem as previous years recall. Calipers stuck.
- NHTSA ID
- 11549811
- Incident
- Sep 1, 2023
The contact owns a 2015 Mazda Mazda6. The contact stated while adjusting the front driver’s seat, the seat failed to move forward or backward. The vehicle was not taken to be diagnosed. The dealer was contacted and stated that the vehicle was not included any recalls. The manufacturer was contacted and stated that the vehicle was not under recall for the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The failure mileage was 102,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11525640
- Incident
- Apr 6, 2023
- Mileage
- 102,000 mi
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; ENGINE
This SA supersedes the previously issued SA(s) listed below. The changes are noted in Red. SA-061/25 12/17/25 DESCRIPTION If you encounter any type of electrical concern (e.g, dead battery, engine no start, DTC(s) stored...), interview the customer before proceeding with normal MGSS diagnosis by asking if any aftermarket devices have been installed. Aftermarket devices may be the cause of the electrical concern. Below are a few examples of unusual electrical concerns caused by aftermarket devices. Examples: 1. Devices connected to the DLC-2 (battery discharge/DTC stored) 2. Devices plugged into the 12V outlet 3. GPS tracking device (engine no start/battery discharge) 4. Dash cam (DTC stored) 5. Non-certified USB cable (Apple Carplay™/ Android Auto™ will not connect) 6. Over-sized wheels/tires (incorrect GPS location) 7. DTC C0023:14 8. Decorative trim and/or cover on the START/STOP ENGINE button Example 1: Some electrical devices connected to the DLC-2 connector by insurance or mobile phone companies may cause: Battery discharge. The device may disrupt the CAN system battery saver mode. • IDS/MMDS will not communicate with the vehicle due to poor DLC-2 connection. The aftermarket device may cause DLC-2 female terminals to spread open.
POWER TRAIN
This bulletin supersedes the previously issued bulletin(s) listed below. The changes are noted in Red. 01-008/23 06/05/23 Some vehicles may exhibit rattling noises from the engine compartment and oil leakage from the drive belt auto tensioner. This may be caused by insufficient sealing at the drive belt auto tensioner damper when the auto tensioner fully operates under both high ambient temperature and high load conditions. To eliminate this concern, the shape of the drive belt auto tensioner damper has been changed. REPAIR PROCEDURE If the tensioner is found to be "No Good" after completing the Drive Belt Auto Tensioner Inspection, replace it with a modified part according to the instructions on MGSS online:
STRUCTURE:BODY
DESCRIPTION Some vehicles may require the replacement of a damaged VIN plate or vehicle certification label. To obtain a replacement VIN plate (bulkhead-mounted and visible through the lower-left area of the windshield), contact DAG (Dealer Assistance Group) using VIN Plate Request Form available on One Mazda. To obtain a replacement vehicle certification label (located on the Bpillar or front door), contact your assigned DSM (District Service Manager) to place the order. If DSM contact information is not available, refer to the Dealer & Field Contact Directory.
ENGINE; POWER TRAIN; SERVICE BRAKES
This Service Alert supersedes the previously issued SA listed below: The changes are noted in Red. SA-011/24 02/12/24, 06/06/24, 07/29/24 DESCRIPTION Mazda has developed factory recommended scheduled maintenance services that support all major vehicle systems. Mazda recommends dealers follow the scheduled maintenance tables as cited in the vehicle-specific workshop manual or owner's manual. Services performed outside of Mazda's factory scheduled maintenance are not recommended. These services are unnecessary and create unneeded expenses for your customers. SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE Refer to the applicable Workshop Manual or Owner's Manual for vehicle -specific manufacturer scheduled maintenance. Workshop Manual - Refer to section 00-00 SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE. Owner's Manual - Refer to section 8 Maintenance and Care. b. Note: Please refer to the information below outlining the services not included in Mazda's Factory Scheduled Maintenance: IMPORTANT: Recommending fluid flushes when not necessary can lead to customer confusion and dissatisfaction. Fluid flushing for preventive maintenance purposes is strongly discouraged, unless otherwise specified in a published procedure (Owner’s Manual, Workshop Manual, Technical Service Bulletin, etc.).
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; STRUCTURE:BODY
This Service Alert supersedes the previously issued SAs and bulletin(s) listed below: The changes are noted below in red. SA-010/23 02/09/23 DESCRIPTION Some customers may experience one or more electrical malfunctions after a vehicle body repair. A newly painted fender stay (2) may be causing a poor front harness (1) ground connection. The front fender stay (2) newly painted surface at ground point (3), where attachment bolt (4) is seated, may create a poor front harness ground connection. NOTE: DO NOT paint ground point (3) attachment bolt (4) is seated. NEWLY INSTALLED FRONT FENDER STAY NOTE: CAUTION: If the bolt (4) contact area (3) is painted when the front fender stay (2) is newly replaced, it could cause a malfunction in the PCM. Before painting a newly replaced part, protect the bolt (4) contact area (3) with masking tape (5) as shown in the figure.
There are currently 2 methods for cutting a new auxiliary key blank. A. Auxiliary Key Trace Cut Method • B. Auxiliary Key Code Cut Method 2019 and newer models require a 10-digit key code to accurately cut keys • 5-digit codes CANNOT be provided for 2019 and newer vehicles (the traditional 5-digit code from the key tag or driver's door lock cylinder is not sufficient and will not be issued for key cutting on these models). • Only Mazda-approved key cutting machines can process these 10-digit codes. • Many older key machines do not support 10-digit codes and cannot be updated to do so. In these cases, dealers will need to purchase one of the newer Mazda-approved key cutting machines capable of handling this requirement. • For a list of current Mazda-approved machines and purchasing options, refer to the Mazda Dealer Equipment Program or view the current Mazda approved key machines below.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 32.1 |
| 2020 | 2 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2019 | 6 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2018 | 56 | 2 | 0 | 52.5 |
| 2017 | 60 | 1 | 0 | 46.4 |
| 2016 | 76 | 1 | 0 | 47.3 |
| 2015Viewing | 60 | 3 | 0 | 48.6 |
| 2014 | 137 | 4 | 0 | 52.5 |
| 2013 | 22 | 4 | 0 | 48.3 |
| 2012 | 99 | 6 | 0 | 53.0 |
| 2011 | 134 | 6 | 0 | 57.3 |
| 2010 | 225 | 9 | 1 | 52.8 |
| 2009 | 386 | 10 | 2 | 55.8 |
| 2008 | 111 | 5 | 3 | 65.0 |
| 2007 | 156 | 6 | 3 | 62.7 |
| 2006 | 173 | 6 | 3 | 59.4 |
| 2005 | 147 | 6 | 3 | 62.1 |
| 2004 | 160 | 7 | 3 | 61.6 |
| 2003 | 174 | 9 | 4 | 59.2 |
| 2002 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 35.6 |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.