AIR BAGS:FRONTAL:PASSENGER SIDE:INFLATOR MODULE
2011 Mazda Mazda6
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
NHTSA has issued a “do not drive” advisory affecting this model year.
Campaign 19V782000. Confirm whether your specific vehicle is covered using its VIN before acting on this.
Check your VIN on NHTSA.govOverview
Our database contains 134 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2011 Mazda Mazda6, most frequently naming the suspension, body & structure and airbags categories. 6 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; and 246 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 2017 | 2 | 52 |
| Nov 2017 | 1 | 53 |
| Dec 2017 | 2 | 55 |
| Feb 2018 | 1 | 56 |
| Jul 2018 | 1 | 57 |
| Aug 2018 | 2 | 59 |
| Sep 2018 | 2 | 61 |
| Oct 2018 | 2 | 63 |
| Nov 2018 | 2 | 65 |
| Dec 2018 | 2 | 67 |
| Jan 2019 | 1 | 68 |
| Mar 2019 | 2 | 70 |
| Apr 2019 | 2 | 72 |
| May 2019 | 1 | 73 |
| Jul 2019 | 2 | 75 |
| Aug 2019 | 2 | 77 |
| Oct 2019 | 1 | 78 |
| Mar 2020 | 1 | 79 |
| May 2020 | 2 | 81 |
| Jun 2020 | 1 | 82 |
| Jul 2020 | 1 | 83 |
| Oct 2020 | 2 | 85 |
| Nov 2020 | 1 | 86 |
| Dec 2020 | 1 | 87 |
| Jan 2021 | 1 | 88 |
| Feb 2021 | 1 | 89 |
| Apr 2021 | 2 | 91 |
| May 2021 | 1 | 92 |
| Jul 2021 | 1 | 93 |
| Aug 2021 | 2 | 95 |
| Sep 2021 | 1 | 96 |
| Mar 2022 | 1 | 97 |
| Jul 2022 | 1 | 98 |
| Aug 2022 | 1 | 99 |
| Sep 2022 | 3 | 102 |
| Nov 2022 | 1 | 103 |
| Jan 2023 | 1 | 104 |
| Feb 2023 | 2 | 106 |
| Jun 2023 | 1 | 107 |
| Jul 2023 | 2 | 109 |
| Dec 2023 | 2 | 111 |
| Feb 2024 | 2 | 113 |
| Mar 2024 | 1 | 114 |
| Apr 2024 | 1 | 115 |
| May 2024 | 1 | 116 |
| Jun 2024 | 1 | 117 |
| Jul 2024 | 3 | 120 |
| Aug 2024 | 1 | 121 |
| Sep 2024 | 1 | 122 |
| Nov 2024 | 1 | 123 |
| Mar 2025 | 1 | 124 |
| Jun 2025 | 1 | 125 |
| Aug 2025 | 2 | 127 |
| Oct 2025 | 1 | 128 |
| Nov 2025 | 1 | 129 |
| Jan 2026 | 1 | 130 |
| Mar 2026 | 1 | 131 |
| Apr 2026 | 1 | 132 |
| May 2026 | 1 | 133 |
| Jun 2026 | 1 | 134 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Suspension4930.1%
- Body & structure3018.4%
- Airbags2817.2%
- Steering159.2%
- Exterior lighting116.7%
- Electrical84.9%
- Visibility53.1%
- Fuel system42.5%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
6 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govSTRUCTURE; SUSPENSION:FRONT:CONTROL ARM
AIR BAGS:FRONTAL:PASSENGER SIDE:INFLATOR MODULE
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
The contact owns a 2011 Mazda Mazda6. The contact stated that while driving at an undisclosed speed and coming to a stop, the steering wheel was not operating properly. Several days later while the contact's wife was driving at an undisclosed speed, there was play in the steering wheel. Additionally, there was an abnormal sound coming from the passenger’s side wheel. The contact stated that the wheel was turning abnormally. A mechanic arrived at the residence to diagnose the vehicle and determined that the sub frame was rusted. While touching the sub frame, pieces of the sub frame fractured. The dealer was notified of the failure. The vehicle was not repaired. The manufacturer was notified of the failure. The failure mileage was 92,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11744830
- Incident
- Jun 13, 2026
- Mileage
- 92,000 mi
The contact owns a 2011 Mazda Mazda6. The contact stated that while driving at 25 MPH, the contact attempted to swerve out the way of another vehicle as she suddenly lost control of the vehicle. Due to the failure, the contact force to steer the vehicle to the left as the contact attempted to maintain control of the vehicle. The contact managed to pull over into a parking lot and called her husband for assistance. Despite the failure, the contact managed to drive the vehicle home despite the vehicle being extremely difficult to maneuver. The contact's husband managed to drive the vehicle to a local mechanic, who determined that the front subframe had failed due to excessive corrosion of the subframe. The mechanic then informed the contact of NHTSA Campaign Number: 19V323000 (Structure, Suspension); however, the contact was informed that her vehicle was not included in the recall. The manufacturer was notified of the failure where they confirmed that the vehicle was not included in the recall. The vehicle remained in the mechanic's possession and had yet to be repaired. The failure mileage was 115,000.
- NHTSA ID
- 11738066
- Incident
- Apr 17, 2026
- Mileage
- 115,000 mi
Front Subframe has corroded and broke. There is a recall on the subframe that was repaired by dealership in 2019, but this repair did not fix the issue since it has now rusted through and broke. The repair was faulty.
- NHTSA ID
- 11730786
- Incident
- Mar 27, 2026
Car developed a known recall issue problem, Recall 2818I. Even though Nebraska was not listed as a "salt state", it's obvious that Nebraska has similar conditions to Iowa. Attempts to contact Mazda USA corporate would not even fix the issue, citing cars age and other factors even though the damage is very specific to this particular recall.
- NHTSA ID
- 11722303
- Incident
- Mar 3, 2026
2011 Mazda6 A serious safety defect occurred on my vehicle and matches NHTSA Recall 19V-323 / Mazda Recall 2818I (front cross member corrosion due to insufficient coating) despite this recall not being associated with my VIN. Front cross member cracked due to rust, causing loss of steering control, wheel misalignment, and scraping from the front wheel. This is exactly the failure described in the recall (breakage of the cross member and reduced steering control, increasing the risk of a crash). My safety and the safety of others were put at risk. Although my VIN is not currently associated with the recall, all conditions of the recall apply to my vehicle: -2011 Mazda6 within the affected production range -Defect is a manufacturing issue (insufficient paint coating) -Vehicle was registered in Missouri from 2023-2025, which is a listed state The only reason this recall was not associated with my VIN is because the vehicle was not registered in Missouri at the exact time of the 2019 recall campaign. This is an administrative gap, not a safety distinction. It should not be allowed to limit a manufacturer safety defect to specific states. Vehicles move across state lines constantly. A defect that causes loss of steering control does not stop being dangerous when a car crosses a border. Registration records alone did not reflect actual vehicle use or risk. If recalls are state-limited, manufacturers and NHTSA must continue tracking registration changes and associate the recall with the VIN as soon as a vehicle becomes registered in an affected state. Rust is progressive and age-related. Since this recall began in 2019 and it is now 2026, affected vehicles are more likely to experience failure, and many are now registered in different states than they were in 2019. I am requesting that NHTSA associate Recall 19V-323 with my VIN, investigate the adequacy of state-limited recall tracking, and take action to prevent this known safety defect from causing additional crashes.
- NHTSA ID
- 11713263
- Incident
- Jan 16, 2026
When I took the car into my ASE mechanic shop for a normal oil change and tire rotation, they performed a general overall car inspection. They noticed that the Driver Side Rear Subframe had rusted through completely, where the coil spring is located. The passenger side was rusted, but has not yet broke through. They stated that the subframe parts should not rust through like this. They also stated that it is dangerous to drive the car in this condition. I have not notified the manufacturer as of yet, but plan to do so. There were no warning lights, but the ride did seem to be rougher than normal. The attach photos contain 2 photos of the failed driver side rear subframe and 1 photo of the good, passenger side rear subframe.
- NHTSA ID
- 11700788
- Incident
- Nov 21, 2025
2011 Mazda6 rear subframe rot/rust, unsafe and dangerous to drive, Same situation as the front subframe that is part of a recall.
- NHTSA ID
- 11695663
- Incident
- Oct 26, 2025
The front and back cross members underneath my Mazda6 have completely rusted out. There are numerous complaints about Mazda's "Safety Recall 2818I Expansion" not covering the back support member and also not considering Nebraska to be a Salt Belt state despite the state, and specifically Omaha using salt to treat their roads in the winter. On [XXX], my front cross member completely failed due to rust, causing my vehicle to lose control. I've taken my car to the mechanic and they confirmed the front and back cross members are completely rusted and need replacement costing $7,000. INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11682499
- Incident
- Aug 21, 2025
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; VISIBILITY/WIPER
This bulletin supersedes the previously issued bulletin(s) listed below. The changes are noted in Red text. 09-042/04 12/10/04 DESCRIPTION Some vehicles may exhibit inoperative electric rear window defroster grid lines, integral antenna concerns causing radio reception issues or terminal tabs pulled from the rear window glass. Follow the diagnostic and repair procedures included in this service information to inspect and service rear defroster grid lines, integral antenna concerns or broken terminal tabs.
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM; ENGINE
This SA supersedes the previously issued SA(s) listed below. The changes are noted in Red. SA-061/25 12/17/25 DESCRIPTION If you encounter any type of electrical concern (e.g, dead battery, engine no start, DTC(s) stored...), interview the customer before proceeding with normal MGSS diagnosis by asking if any aftermarket devices have been installed. Aftermarket devices may be the cause of the electrical concern. Below are a few examples of unusual electrical concerns caused by aftermarket devices. Examples: 1. Devices connected to the DLC-2 (battery discharge/DTC stored) 2. Devices plugged into the 12V outlet 3. GPS tracking device (engine no start/battery discharge) 4. Dash cam (DTC stored) 5. Non-certified USB cable (Apple Carplay™/ Android Auto™ will not connect) 6. Over-sized wheels/tires (incorrect GPS location) 7. DTC C0023:14 8. Decorative trim and/or cover on the START/STOP ENGINE button Example 1: Some electrical devices connected to the DLC-2 connector by insurance or mobile phone companies may cause: Battery discharge. The device may disrupt the CAN system battery saver mode. • IDS/MMDS will not communicate with the vehicle due to poor DLC-2 connection. The aftermarket device may cause DLC-2 female terminals to spread open.
ENGINE; POWER TRAIN; SERVICE BRAKES
This Service Alert supersedes the previously issued SA listed below: The changes are noted in Red. SA-011/24 02/12/24, 06/06/24, 07/29/24 DESCRIPTION Mazda has developed factory recommended scheduled maintenance services that support all major vehicle systems. Mazda recommends dealers follow the scheduled maintenance tables as cited in the vehicle-specific workshop manual or owner's manual. Services performed outside of Mazda's factory scheduled maintenance are not recommended. These services are unnecessary and create unneeded expenses for your customers. SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE Refer to the applicable Workshop Manual or Owner's Manual for vehicle -specific manufacturer scheduled maintenance. Workshop Manual - Refer to section 00-00 SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE. Owner's Manual - Refer to section 8 Maintenance and Care. b. Note: Please refer to the information below outlining the services not included in Mazda's Factory Scheduled Maintenance: IMPORTANT: Recommending fluid flushes when not necessary can lead to customer confusion and dissatisfaction. Fluid flushing for preventive maintenance purposes is strongly discouraged, unless otherwise specified in a published procedure (Owner’s Manual, Workshop Manual, Technical Service Bulletin, etc.).
ELECTRICAL SYSTEM
If you encounter any type of electrical concern (e.g, dead battery, engine no start, DTC(s) stored...), interview the customer before proceeding with normal MGSS diagnosis by asking if any aftermarket devices have been installed. Aftermarket devices may be the cause of the electrical concern. Below are a few examples of unusual electrical concerns caused by aftermarket devices.
A musty/mildew type odor may come from the vents when the air conditioning (A/C) system is operating. It is most noticeable when the A/C is first turned ON. This odor is the result of mold growth in the A/C evaporator/cooling unit which is caused by condensation, dust, and pollen within the cooling unit. This condition is usually worse during high humidity conditions. “Mazda Air Cooling Coil Coating” is available to encapsulate the mold to reduce odors. If the product is properly applied, it can effectively reduce the musty/mildew odor for up to three years. NOTE: See parts information for Mazda Air Cooling Coil Coating and Kit part numbers.
STRUCTURE:BODY
Some vehicles may experience exterior trim heat damage such (melted, separating, etc.) when parked near a glass building or Low-E windows. This may be caused by the sun's reflection. If a structure's windows create enough of a curve, the concave glass can focus the sun's rays onto a small area and acting like magnifiying glass direct the sunbeams into a hot pinpoint of light. This magnifcation of the sun's rays can cause damage to vehicle trim (see examples). Additional information and exemplar images regarding this phenomenon can be found by performing a google search.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | 17 | 0 | 0 | 32.1 |
| 2020 | 2 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2019 | 6 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2018 | 56 | 2 | 0 | 52.5 |
| 2017 | 60 | 1 | 0 | 46.4 |
| 2016 | 76 | 1 | 0 | 47.3 |
| 2015 | 60 | 3 | 0 | 48.6 |
| 2014 | 137 | 4 | 0 | 52.5 |
| 2013 | 22 | 4 | 0 | 48.3 |
| 2012 | 99 | 6 | 0 | 53.0 |
| 2011Viewing | 134 | 6 | 0 | 57.3 |
| 2010 | 225 | 9 | 1 | 52.8 |
| 2009 | 386 | 10 | 2 | 55.8 |
| 2008 | 111 | 5 | 3 | 65.0 |
| 2007 | 156 | 6 | 3 | 62.7 |
| 2006 | 173 | 6 | 3 | 59.4 |
| 2005 | 147 | 6 | 3 | 62.1 |
| 2004 | 160 | 7 | 3 | 61.6 |
| 2003 | 174 | 9 | 4 | 59.2 |
| 2002 | 28 | 1 | 0 | 35.6 |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.