FORWARD COLLISION AVOIDANCE: SENSING SYSTEM: RADAR
2025 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 2500
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 2 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2025 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 2500, most frequently naming the other / unspecified, powertrain (other) and suspension categories. 1 safety recall has been issued covering this model year; and 36 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
Not enough dated records to plot a meaningful trend — 2 months of data.
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Other / unspecified133.3%
- Powertrain (other)133.3%
- Suspension133.3%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
1 campaign cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govRecent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
Subject: Transmission Failure Safety Complaint I am submitting a complaint regarding a serious transmission problem with my vehicle. While driving, the transmission suddenly failed, and the vehicle lost the ability to move properly. The car would not accelerate as expected and had difficulty. In some instances, the vehicle would not move forward or reverse. Warning indicators appeared, and the transmission Fault Stop began showing abnormal behavior such as delayed shifting, jerking, slipping, or sudden loss of power. This created a dangerous safety risk, especially while driving in traffic and at intersections. The vehicle has been maintained regularly, and this issue occurred unexpectedly. I believe this transmission defect may affect other vehicles of the same make and model and should be investigated for consumer safety. The dealership attributed the issue to wrong fuel, but I am concerned the actual issue involves transmission failure. I have a fuel purchase receipt showing the correct fuel was purchased before the incident. Despite this, the dealership suggested wrong fuel as the cause. I respectfully request that this matter be reviewed and appropriate action be taken. Vehicle Information: Make: Mercedes-Benz Model: Mercedes-Benz Sprinter Cargo Van 2500 Year: 2025 Mileage: 71599 VIN [XXX] Date of Incident:03/24/2026 INFORMATION REDACTED PURSUANT TO THE FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. 552(B)(6)
- NHTSA ID
- 11734794
- Incident
- Mar 24, 2026
Refer to Safety Recall 25V747 and see the attachment which outlines our complaint. RV does not comply with requirements of FMVSS 110 and 49 CFR Part 567. We were the reporting party to the manufacturer and according to NHTSA database, our VIN is not present for the required recall service/extended fuel tank replacement. The RV manufacturer and dealer are not presently responding to requests from us to have the recall service completed. We believe they have not correctly reported additional safety concerns as are described in the attachment. The manufacturer has communicated that since producing RV's in 2021, they have improperly weighed RVs which has resulted in inaccurate OCCC labeling and we believe owners unknowingly operated RV's over GVWR. Our RV's OCCC is 333 lbs. A 174 lb weight savings per Safety Recall 25V747 will not bring our RV into compliance as we have a certified curb weight of 8700 lbs. and believe other same year/models have the same curb weight. Additionally, we are inquiring if Remote Vans is required to provide a cargo carrying allowance in addition to the occupant weight i.e. 600 lbs. for four seat belted passengers per FMVSS 110. We have also filed a complaint/attachment with Oregon Department of Justice Consumer Protection on 11/28/25.
- NHTSA ID
- 11706084
- Incident
- Mar 26, 2025
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
POWER TRAIN
Complaint While driving through muddy / sandy/ off road terrain "4Matic Currently Unavailable" message on the dash Cause This vehicle is not equipped with a fixed force distribution AWD, rather force is only applied to the front axle according to ESP calculations. As per GF28.00‑D‑ 9900A: "vehicles with 4MATIC all‑wheel system and variable force distribution, an electronically regulated multiplate clutch integrated into the transfer case provides for the torque distribution. If the multiplate clutch is open during normal driving operation, only the rear axle drives the vehicle. If the clutch is closed, the front axle comes into play." The message "All‑wheel drive temporarily unavailable" is not indicative of a malfunction but rather informs the driver that all‑wheel drive is currently not available due to the transfer case clutch overheating. This occurs when the vehicle is driven in such a way that maximum front axle torque is needed for an extended period, causing the clutch to get excessively hot. If the vehicle is being driven under heavy load conditions, like in deep sand or snow, the rear axle may slip while the front axle does not deliver power. The transfer case then attempts to distribute torque to correct the slip, but it is limited to a maximum of 1150 Nm to protect the front axle transmission. In extended heavy‑load scenarios, the multidisk clutch in the transfer case slips, increasing the temperature. If the temperature model detects a critical temperature of 240°C, the system protects itself by disconnecting until it cools down to around 160°C, after which the all‑wheel drive becomes available again and the warning message disappears.Vehicles can handle flat terrain easily, but steep slopes or situations where wheels slip might cause additional resistance, leading to the described protection events and message in the dash. Remedy Recommendation is to release the vehicle back to the client with an explanation that the vehicle is operating as designed. Please advise the client to limit vehicle acceleration in limited traction situations to avoid disabling of the 4Matic system ‑ please see "Notes on all‑wheel drive" provided in the operators manual.
POWER TRAIN
Complaint The coolant warning lamp may be displayed in the instrument cluster. The malfunction indicator lamp (MIL) may also be illuminated. Cause Moisture or corrosion may be present in the connector of the low‑temperature circuit switchover valve (Y97/6) or coolant pump 1 (M75/11). Remedy Inspect the connectors and pins at the low‑temperature circuit switchover valve and coolant pump 1 for moisture, corrosion, or terminal damage. If moisture, corrosion, or terminal damage is found, replace the affected connector or wiring harness and the corresponding component as required. If available, use the wiring harness as the repair measure. If the wiring harness is not available or is not applicable, replace the connector housing and required small parts in the wiring harness.
FUEL/PROPULSION SYSTEM
Oil Leak at Crankcase Near the High-pressure Fuel Pump OM654 Complaint Visible oil leak at the crankcase near the mounting area of the high‑pressure fuel pump on OM654 engines. Cause Oil leakage near the high‑pressure fuel pump may result from insufficient sealing performance of the jump shaft seal and/or reduced sealing effectiveness at the interface between the high‑pressure fuel pump and crankcase. Relative movement of the high‑pressure fuel pump within the crankcase bore may reduce sealing effectiveness at the pump‑to‑crankcase interface and promote oil migration during engine operation. Remedy Install a new high‑pressure fuel pump together with the design‑optimized sealing ring.
POWER TRAIN
OM654 Engine Oil Consumption Complaint The customer may report repeated low engine oil level warnings in the instrument cluster. The customer may also state that engine oil must be added between scheduled maintenance intervals. During diagnosis, oil residue may be observed at the oil filler neck, cylinder head cover, crankcase ventilation connection, charge air pipes, charge air cooler, intake tract, or turbocharger area. In some cases, the complaint may be accompanied by increased diesel particulate filter (DPF) regeneration frequency or aftertreatment‑related fault entries. Cause Increased engine oil consumption may be caused by external oil leakage, crankcase ventilation system concerns, reduced oil separation efficiency in the cylinder head cover, turbocharger oil leakage, charge air system oil accumulation, fuel dilution, vehicle operating profile, oil level sensor plausibility concerns, or internal engine mechanical damage. A measured engine oil consumption test is required before a repair direction is determined. Customer‑reported oil additions or instrument cluster oil level messages alone are not sufficient to determine the repair. Remedy 1. Perform the engine oil consumption measurement according to AR18.00‑D‑ 0025TSM. 2. If the measured oil consumption is within specification, no repair related to engine oil consumption is required. • Verify the correct engine oil specification and review the vehicle operating profile, maintenance history, idle time, and regeneration frequency. If the complaint is based mainly on an oil level message and measured oil consumption is not confirmed, verify oil level sensor plausibility before continuing with engine oil consumption diagnosis. 3. If the measured oil consumption exceeds specification, inspect the engine for external oil leaks. • Pay close attention to the oil filler neck, oil filler neck seal, cylinder head cover area, oil filter housing, crankcase ventilation connections, turbocharger oil supply and return areas, and other visible sealing points. 4. If an external oil leak is identified, repair the leak according to the applicable repair instructions. • Correct the engine oil level and repeat the oil consumption measurement if necessary. 5. Inspect the crankcase ventilation connection, turbocharger inlet and outlet, charge air pipes, and charge air cooler for oil accumulation. • A light oil film alone does not confirm a turbocharger or engine failure. Oil pooling, heavy oil accumulation, debris, or oil migration into the intake tract requires further inspection. 6. If there is no clear external oil leak, no severe charge air system oil contamination, and no obvious turbocharger damage, inspect the crankcase ventilation system first. 7. Perform the crankcase ventilation shutoff valve leak‑tightness test according to AR01.40‑D‑0050TSM. 8. If the crankcase ventilation shutoff valve fails the leak‑tightness test, replace the shutoff valve and the cylinder head cover with integrated oil separator. Replace all required seals and hardware. 9. If the crankcase ventilation shutoff valve passes the leak‑tightness test, no external oil leak is identified, no abnormal turbocharger oil entry is found, and the engine mechanical condition is not suspect, replace the cylinder head cover with integrated oil separator. • Fill the engine with oil meeting MB 229.52 SAE 5W‑30 and repeat the engine oil consumption measurement according to AR18.00‑D‑0025TSM.
ENGINE
Complaint Low Coolant warning with possible engine misfire caused by a leaking Charge Air Cooler (Intercooler), accompanied by one or more of the following possible fault codes related to the coolant system: P30040B: Component 'Temperature sensor downstream of charge air cooler' has an open circuit or short circuit to positive. P25567B: Sensor 'Coolant level' has a malfunction. The fluid level is too low. Cause The potential causes for this topic are: A. A leak in the Coolant System, other than the Charge Air Cooler. B. An Internal leak of the Charge Air Cooler. C. An unapproved/aftermarket upfit or modification to the coolant system. Remedy A. A leak in the Coolant System, other than the Charge Air Cooler 1. Complete a coolant system pressure test: •Refer to WIS Doc AR20.00‑D‑1011TS ‑ Check engine cooling system for leak tightness. •Use Tester Cap 210 589 00 91 and Pressure Pump 124 589 24 21 00. •Apply test pressure to the engine cooling system. Do not exceed the specified test pressure of 1.5 Bar to prevent damage to the engine cooling system. •Perform a visual check on the top and bottom of the engine compartment and in the vehicle interior. •If coolant loss or pressure loss is present, perform suitable repair measures depending on the vehicle equipment. •If NO signs of coolant loss are found but pressure loss is present, proceed to Step B. B. An Internal leak of the Charge Air Cooler 1. Inspect the Charge Air Cooler for an internal leak: •Remove either the Throttle Valve or Charge Air Temperature Sensor to inspect for coolant loss. See attachments for the failed Charge Air Cooler. •If coolant is found inside the Charge Air Cooler: •Perform a manual compression test to confirm the absence of internal engine failures per WIS Doc AR01.00‑D‑1201TSM ‑ Check compression pressure. •Remove and clean any coolant present in the Charge Air System, Intake System, and Cylinders. •Replace the Charge Air Cooler, the glow plugs, and then conduct an oil and filter change. Refer to AR09.41‑D‑6817TSM ‑ Remove/install charge air cooler. •If coolant is not found inside the Charge Air Cooler, proceed to Step C. C. An unapproved/aftermarket upfit or modification to the coolant system 1. Inspect the Coolant system for any unapproved/aftermarket upfits or modifications: •See the Attachments for examples of non‑approved upfits or modifications. •Note: The OM654 cannot have any aftermarket modifications made to the coolant system per the Body and Equipment Guidelines (BEG) under 4.4.3 Engine Cooling, "Do not make modifications to the cooling system (cooler components, air ducting, hose, and other detachable parts that are part of the cooling system)". •If there are modifications made to the coolant system that violate the BEG, do not complete any repairs on the system under warranty until either your Vans Aftersales Business Development Manager (VABDM) or facing Field Service Engineer (FSE) reviews the vehicle.
POWER TRAIN
Model 907 with all-wheel drive (A4M) – All-wheel drive inoperative Complaint The customer may report one or more of the following: • All-wheel drive is unavailable or inoperative. • Rear wheel slip during acceleration on low-traction surfaces. • Noise from the front axle area while driving. • Message in the instrument cluster indicating all-wheel drive is unavailable due to overheating. • Fault code P27874B - The temperature of the clutch is too high. There is a fault due to overtemperature may be stored in control unit N15 (Transfer Case). Cause An internal failure of the front axle differential may result in loss of torque transfer to the front wheels. In some cases, a fracture of the weld between the crown gear and differential housing may be present. Remedy Replace the front axle differential in accordance with: AR33.30-D-0525TSY – Replace Front Axle Differential.
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
| Year | Complaints | Recalls | Investigations | Issue Index |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2025Viewing | 2 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2024 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 58.3 |
| 2023 | 17 | 7 | 0 | 53.6 |
| 2022 | 40 | 7 | 0 | 57.3 |
| 2021 | 45 | 18 | 0 | 56.2 |
| 2020 | 80 | 22 | 0 | 51.2 |
| 2019 | 67 | 42 | 0 | 58.9 |
| 2018 | 14 | 9 | 2 | 56.7 |
| 2017 | 13 | 7 | 2 | 54.2 |
| 2016 | 28 | 15 | 2 | 55.4 |
| 2015 | 23 | 14 | 1 | 54.4 |
| 2014 | 38 | 6 | 1 | 58.0 |
| 2013 | 21 | 3 | 1 | 44.8 |
| 2012 | 8 | 2 | 1 | — |
| 2011 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 46.7 |
| 2010 | 14 | 6 | 1 | 45.7 |
| 2009 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2008 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2007 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.