FUEL SYSTEM, GASOLINE
1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme
Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data
Data refreshed
Overview
Our database contains 38 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 1990 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme, most frequently naming the body & structure, brakes and interior & seats categories. 2 safety recalls have been issued covering this model year; 5 NHTSA investigations name it; and 2 manufacturer communications are on file.
Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.
Complaint activity over time
When owners filed reports about this model year
View as table
| Month | Complaints filed | Cumulative |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 1996 | 1 | 1 |
| Jan 1997 | 1 | 2 |
| Sep 1997 | 1 | 3 |
| Jun 1998 | 1 | 4 |
| Aug 1998 | 1 | 5 |
| Oct 1998 | 1 | 6 |
| Dec 1998 | 1 | 7 |
| Mar 1999 | 2 | 9 |
| Apr 1999 | 1 | 10 |
| May 1999 | 2 | 12 |
| Jun 1999 | 1 | 13 |
| Sep 1999 | 1 | 14 |
| Jun 2000 | 1 | 15 |
| Aug 2000 | 2 | 17 |
| Oct 2000 | 2 | 19 |
| Nov 2000 | 1 | 20 |
| Jan 2001 | 2 | 22 |
| Feb 2001 | 2 | 24 |
| Apr 2001 | 1 | 25 |
| Jun 2001 | 1 | 26 |
| Sep 2001 | 1 | 27 |
| Jun 2002 | 1 | 28 |
| Jul 2002 | 1 | 29 |
| Mar 2003 | 2 | 31 |
| Apr 2003 | 1 | 32 |
| Jul 2003 | 1 | 33 |
| Dec 2003 | 1 | 34 |
| Jan 2004 | 1 | 35 |
| Aug 2004 | 1 | 36 |
| Dec 2004 | 1 | 37 |
| Oct 2005 | 1 | 38 |
What owners report
Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded
- Body & structure1331.7%
- Brakes819.5%
- Interior & seats717.1%
- Engine37.3%
- Seat belts24.9%
- Transmission24.9%
- Driver assistance24.9%
- Electrical24.9%
Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.
Safety recalls
2 campaigns cover this model year
Recalls apply to specific vehicles, not to every vehicle of a model year. Check your VIN with NHTSA or your manufacturer's dealer to confirm whether a recall affects your vehicle.
Check a VIN on NHTSA.govSTRUCTURE
Safety investigations
NHTSA inquiries naming this vehicle. An investigation is not a finding of a defect.
STRUCTURE
There is no summary currently available
STICKING THROTTLE
There is no summary currently available
JACK FAILURE
===
JACK FAILURE
There is no summary currently available
Recent owner complaints
Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words
I HAVE A 1990 OLDSMOBLE CUTLASS SUPREME. A RECALL #00065 FOR GM WAS DONE ON MY CAR AND ONLY THE FRONT CRADLE BOLTS AND RETAINERS WERE DONE. BUT UPON REVIEWING NHTSA'S RECALL #00V189000 THE FRONT AND REAR SHOULD HAVE BEEN DONE. SINCE THE REFUSAL FROM GM THE REAR BOLTS HAVE COME DOWN AND MY ENGINE IS LEANING BACK. I HAVE TALKED TO THE DEALER TWICE AND THE MANUFACTURE GM 3 TIMES AND THEY BOTH SAY THAT THEY ONLY HAVE TO DO THE FRONT CRADLE BOLTS FOR THEIR RECALL AND NOT THE REAR. I ALSO HAVE MY ORIGINAL RECEIPT THAT SAYS ONLY 2 BOLTS AND RETAINERS WERE BOUGHT AND INSTALLED. *NM
- NHTSA ID
- 10140878
- Incident
- Apr 2, 2004
CONSUMER NOTICED THAT FIRE WAS COMING FROM THE SIDE OF THE TRUNK. FIRE DEPARTMENT WAS NOTIFIED, AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THE ANTENNA WIRES CAUSED THE FIRE.*AK
- NHTSA ID
- 10103219
- Incident
- Dec 3, 2004
THE DIGITAL DASHBOARD COMPONENT DOESN'T WORK 99% OF THE TIME. I NEVER KNOW THE SPEED I AM GOING, OR IF CHECK ENGINE LIGHT OR ANYTHING COMES ON. WHEN THE DASH DOES COME ON IF YOU HIT THE SLIGHTEST BUMP IT GOES BACK OFF. I FEEL THIS IS UNSAFE. AS I RESEARCHED THIS SITE FOR SIMILAR PROBLEMS WITH THE SAME CAR I FIND THAT MY COMPLAINT IS THE 5TH ONE FOR THE SAME EXACT PROBLEM. I HAVE BOUGHT AND REPLACED THE COMPONENT THINKING IT WOULD FIX THE PROBLEM, BUT IT DIDN'T. IT IS WITH THE WIRING ITSELF. A DEFECT IN THE WRING FROM THE MANUFATURER, AGAIN IT'S NOT THE COMPONENTS. I WOULD LIKE A RECALL TO BE ISSUED FOR THIS PROBLEM. I STILL HAVE THE OLD DASH COMPONENT SO IF THEY NEED TO BE TESTED.*AK
- NHTSA ID
- 10086856
- Incident
- Jul 14, 2000
- Mileage
- 123,000 mi
WHEN THE BATTERY WAS REPLACED, THE VEHICLE HAD TO BE TOWED. THE VEHICLE HAD TO BE REPROGRAMMED. THE OWNER STATED THERE WAS NO WHERE IN THE MANUAL THAT STATED THE VEHICLE WOULD NEED TO BE REPROGRAMMED WITH EVERY BATTERY CHANGE. ALSO, THE CONSUMER STATED WHEN HE TOOK HIS FOOT OFF THE ACCELERATOR THE VEHICLE STALLED. *JB
- NHTSA ID
- 10055768
THE HOOD LATCH CABLE FROZE AND THE HOOD RELEASE LEVER BROKE. IN TURN THEE CABLE AND THE LEVER MUST BE REPLACED.*AK
- NHTSA ID
- 10050900
- Incident
- Dec 15, 2003
- Mileage
- 67,750 mi
CONSUMER CALLED COMPLAINING ABOUT REAR CARRIAGE BOLTS PROBLEM. STATED FRAME CAME DOWN ON THE CAR, CAUSING ENGINE TO FALL OUT OF THE VEHICLE.MANUFACTURER AND A DEALER WEE CONTACTED, AND STATED THAT WAS NOT A PROBLEM, AND THAT THEY HAVE NOT HEARD OF THE PROBLEM BEFORE.*AK
- NHTSA ID
- 10027170
- Incident
- Jul 7, 2003
LTR FM BRYAN GRANT (NJ) *MR. THE CONSUMER RECEIVED A RECALL NOTICE REGARDING THE REPLACEMENT OF THE FRONT AND REAR FRAME CRADLE BOLTS, THE DEALER ONLY REPLACED THE FRONT FRAME CRADLE BOLTS AND RETAINERS, HOWEVER MONTHS LATER THE ENGINE HAD FALLEN FROM THE VEHICLE, WHICH LEFT THE VEHICLE WITH NO STEERING CAPABILITY AND SUBSEQUENTLY THE VEHICLE HAD TO BE TOWED, THE CONSUMER WAS INFORMED THE REAR FRAME CRADLE BOLTS HAD SEPARATED, WHICH WAS SUPPOSE TO HAVE BEEN REPLACED DURING THE INITIAL RECALL. *JB *CB *JB
- NHTSA ID
- 10012283
- Incident
- Dec 12, 2002
ENGINE FELL OUT OF VEHICLE. MR (NOTE: EXEC SEC CONTROLLED A CORRESPONDENCE REGARDING MR. GRANT'S VEHICLE - SEE ODI REFERENCE NO. 10012283, CCMMERCURY NO. ES03-001972). THE REPLACED THE FRONT FRAME /CRADLE BOLTS UNDER RECALL, HOWEVER ON DEC 12, 2002 THE REAR FRAME/ CRADLE BOLTS AND RETAINER SEPARATED. *JB
- NHTSA ID
- 10015199
- Incident
- Dec 12, 2002
Manufacturer communications
A bulletin sent by a manufacturer to its dealers. Not a recall, and repairs are not necessarily free.
SUSPENSION
CUSTOMERS MAY COMPLAIN OF GRINDING / SCRAPING / GROANING NOISE FROM REAR SUSPENSION. *TT
ENGINE AND ENGINE COOLING:ENGINE:GASOLINE
SOME V6 ENGINES MAY, ON A VERY INFREQUENT BASIS, HAVE AN OIL ODOR CONDITION THAT IS GENERALLY ENCOUNTERED AFTER THE ENGINE'S OIL HAS BEEN CHANGED.TYPICALLY THE ODOR LASTS APPROXIMATELY 1000 MILES AFTER THE CHANGE OF OIL AND THEN DOES NOT REAPPEAR UNTIL THE NEXT CHANGE OF OIL. *TT
Manufacturers file copies of the bulletins they send to dealers with NHTSA. These often describe diagnostic or repair procedures for a known condition. They are not recalls: repairs described in a bulletin are usually only free if the vehicle is still under warranty or the manufacturer has extended coverage.
Compare model years
Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model
Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.