RoadVitals

2002 Mercury Marquis

Recalls, owner-reported complaints, investigations and safety data

Data refreshed

Owner complaintsComplaints are reports submitted to NHTSA by owners and drivers. NHTSA does not verify most reports before publishing them, and a complaint does not establish that a defect exists. Volume is influenced by how many of a vehicle were sold, how long it has been on the road, and how much attention an issue has received.
11
Latest Feb 15, 2013
Safety recallsA safety recall is issued when a manufacturer or NHTSA determines that a vehicle has a safety-related defect or does not comply with a federal motor vehicle safety standard. Recall repairs are free. Whether a specific vehicle is covered depends on its VIN — a recall listed for a model year does not necessarily apply to every vehicle of that year.
0
InvestigationsNHTSA opens an investigation to examine whether a safety defect may exist. An open investigation is not a determination that a defect exists, and many investigations close without a recall. Investigations can, however, lead to one.
0
Crash or fire reportedComplaints whose submitter recorded that a crash or a fire occurred. These are the reporter's own answers on the NHTSA form, not verified findings.
3
2 injuries, 0 deaths reported

Overview

Our database contains 11 NHTSA owner-reported complaints for the 2002 Mercury Marquis, most frequently naming the brakes, engine and body & structure categories.

Complaints are reports submitted by owners and drivers to NHTSA. They are not verified and do not establish that a defect exists.

What owners report

Complaints grouped by the component NHTSA recorded

  • Brakes436.4%
  • Engine218.2%
  • Body & structure19.1%
  • Seat belts19.1%
  • Suspension19.1%
  • Electrical19.1%
  • Driver assistance19.1%

Percentages are of component mentions. A single complaint can name more than one component, so these do not sum to the total complaint count.

Safety recalls

No recalls in our database for this model year

That does not guarantee a specific vehicle is unaffected — recalls are issued against VINs, and new campaigns are announced regularly. Check a VIN on NHTSA.gov.

Recent owner complaints

Reports submitted to NHTSA, shown in the owner's own words

View all 11
Seat belts
Filed Feb 15, 2013

FRONT PASSENGER SEAT BELT DISCONNECTS FOR NO APPARENT REASON. IT HAS HAPPENED MULTIPLE TIMES AT DIFFERENT SPEEDS. THE PERSON RIDING IN THE SEAT WAS AN ADULT ON EVERY OCCASION. I FOUND A RECALL ONLINE FROM 2001, BUT WAS TOLD BY FORD MOTOR COMPANY THAT MY CAR IS NO LONGER UNDER WARRANTY SO WOULD NOT FIX THE PROBLEM. I HAVE NEVER BEEN NOTIFIED OF ANY RECALLS.MY CAR STILL LOOKS LIKE NEW AND I DON'T PLAN ON GETTING RID OF IT ANYTIME SOON. BUT I ALSO CAN'T HAVE MY PASSENGER WORRYING ABOUT THE SEAT BELT COMING UNDONE. ESPECIALLY IN AN ACCIDENT. *TR

NHTSA ID
10498247
Incident
Feb 1, 2008
Mileage
100,000 mi
Suspension
Filed Jan 7, 2011

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2002 MERCURY GRAND MARQUIS. THE CONTACT STATED WHILE DRIVING APPROXIMATELY 40 MPH HE HEARD A NOISE IN THE REAR PASSENGER AREA. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO A LOCAL MECHANIC WHO WAS UNABLE TO DIAGNOSE THE FAILURE. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE DEALER WHO PERFORMED A DIAGNOSTIC TEST THAT LOCATED THE FAILURE TO THE REAR DRIVER AND PASSENGER SIDE AXLES, BEARING AND SEALS. THE MANUFACTURER FILED REPORT 0405220071, BUT WILL NOT ASSIST WITH THE REPAIR. THE VEHICLE WAS NOT REPAIRED. THE FAILURE MILEAGE WAS 98,000 AND THE CURRENT MILEAGE WAS 107,000. UPDATED 03/15/11*LJ THE CONSUMER STATED THE NOISE WAS A RECURRING ISSUE EACH TIME THE VEHICLE WAS DRIVEN AND REPAIRED. THE PROBLEM HAS SINCE BEEN REPAIRED. THE CONSUMER BELIEVED THE PREMATURE AXLE WEAR COULD BE A DANGER AND COULD HAVE CAUSED AN ACCIDENT. UPDATED 08/17/11

NHTSA ID
10375083
Incident
Aug 20, 2010
Mileage
98,000 mi
Engine
Filed Sep 3, 2010

TL*THE CONTACT OWNS A 2002 MERCURY MARQUIS. THE CONTACT NOTICED FLUID ON THE GROUND WHEN THE VEHICLE WAS TURNED OFF. THE VEHICLE WAS TAKEN TO THE MECHANIC WHO LOCATED THE FAILURE AS THE INTAKE MANIFOLD. THE VEHICLE WILL BE REPAIRED. THE FAILURE AND THE CURRENT MILEAGES WERE 105,000.

NHTSA ID
10353654
Incident
Sep 1, 2010
Mileage
105,000 mi
Brakes
Filed Aug 3, 2006

DT*: THE CONTACT STATED THE BRAKE AND ACCELERATOR PADS WERE POSITIONED TOO CLOSE TOGETHER. THE DEALER REFUSED TO EXAMINE VEHICLE AND WOULD NOT PROVIDE REPAIR WORK. THE MANUFACTURER WAS CALLED AND A COMPLAINT WAS FILED. UPDATED 08/24/06. *JB

NHTSA ID
10164303
Incident
Feb 1, 2002
Mileage
55,000 mi
Brakes
Filed Oct 22, 2005

EMERGENCY BRAKE RELEASE MECHANISM FROZEN WITH BRAKE ON. EMERGENCY BRAKE RELEASE IN CABIN RETURNED TO NORMAL POSITION GIVING INDICATION THAT THE BRAKE HAD BEEN RELEASED. END RESULT COMPLETE WIPE OUT OF REAR BRAKES AND DAMAGE TO DRUMS. FAILURE FOUND BY THE SERVICING DEALER AFTER WARRANTY EXPIRED. YET ON EACH OF THE LAST TWO(2) OCCASIONS WHEN CAR WENT IN FOR SERVICE I REQUESTED " CHECK EMERGENCY BRAKE" EMERGENCY BRAKE PEDAL 1"+/- OFF THE FLOOR RESPONSE WAS BRAKES O.K. ONLY AFTER THE EXPIRATION OF THE WARRANTY WAS PROBLEM FOUND. MY GRAND MARQUIS HAS BEEN SERVICED BY NO ONE BUT SMITH CAIRNES, FORD, LINCOLN, MERCURY. IF BY SOME STROKE OF LUCK I HAD DEPENDED SOLEY ON THE EMERGENCY BRAKE A SERIOUS ACCIDENT COULD HAVE RESULTED BY A RUNAWAY CAR. TO ADD INSULT TO INJURY IT COST ME IN EXCESS OF $500.00 TO CORRECT THE PROBLEM. *JB

NHTSA ID
10140497
Incident
Aug 29, 2005
Mileage
13,978 mi
Electrical
Filed Jun 3, 2005

WHILE COMING OFF THE HIGHWAY AT 55 MPH, THE PLASTIC PLASTIC COVER WHICH COVERED THE WIRES FELL DOWN DUE TO PIN FALLING OUT. CONTACT IS STILL DRIVING THE CAR. CAR IS REGULARLY SERVICED. CONTACT KEEPS SERVICE RECORDS. *AK WHEN THE COVER FELL OF IT MADE IT DIFFICULT FOR THE CONSUMER TO HIT THE BRAKE PEDAL. *NM

NHTSA ID
10119843
Incident
Apr 29, 2005
Mileage
45,000 mi
Engine
Filed Nov 3, 2004

WHILE TRAVELING IN INCLEMENT WEATHER THE BELT FELL OFF THE ENGINE CAUSING THE VEHICLE TO SHUT DOWN. THE DEALER IS AWARE TSB #02-05-04. *PH THE CONSUMER SUGGESTED THAT THIS WAS A COMMON PROBLEM WHEN THE BELTS GET WET. *SC

NHTSA ID
8024012
Incident
Dec 3, 2002
Body & structure
Filed Aug 25, 2003
2 injuries reported

CONSUMER SAYS FRONT DOORS WERE DESIGNED WHERE THE TOP CORNER OF THE DOORS HAS A SHARP CORNER. ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS PASSENGER AND DRIVER HAVE BEEN INJURED". CONSUMER BELIEVES DOORS POSE A POTENTIAL RISK OF EYE BEING PUNCTURED.*AK

NHTSA ID
10034558

Compare model years

Complaint and recall counts across every year of this model

Mercury Marquis by model year
YearComplaintsRecallsInvestigationsIssue Index
2004120026.3
2003330038.5
2002Viewing110045.0
2001260141.4
2000230039.4
1999240037.5
1998290137.9
1997531046.1
1996310039.3
1995200026.9
1994300149.7
1993230146.7
1992240149.5
1991900—
1990600—
1989100047.4
1988900—
1987400—
1986412—
1985522—
1984102362.7
1983132—
1982111—
1981030—
1979050—
1977110—
1974020—
1973020—

Higher-selling and older vehicles accumulate more reports. Counts are not failure rates and are not directly comparable between vehicles that sold in very different numbers. Older model years have had longer for reports to accumulate.